Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eef63627818-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eef63627818-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eef63627818-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 December, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4945,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 December, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4945,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4854
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New norms violate RTE, says panel</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . <br /><br />The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. <br /><br />The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. <br /><br />According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&quot; <br /><br />Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . <br /><br />The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&quot; <br /><br />DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &quot;Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&quot; <br /><br />Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year's criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&quot; <br /><br />But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &quot;We will continue with out last year's policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&quot; <br /><br />Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eef63627818-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eef63627818-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eef63627818-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 December, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4945,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 December, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4945,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4854
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New norms violate RTE, says panel</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . <br /><br />The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. <br /><br />The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. <br /><br />According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&quot; <br /><br />Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . <br /><br />The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&quot; <br /><br />DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &quot;Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&quot; <br /><br />Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year's criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&quot; <br /><br />But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &quot;We will continue with out last year's policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&quot; <br /><br />Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eef63627818-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef63627818-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eef63627818-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eef63627818-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 December, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4945,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4854,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 December, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4945,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4854
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &amp;quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &amp;quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &amp;quot;Delhi government&#039;s directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year&#039;s criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &amp;quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &amp;quot;We will continue with out last year&#039;s policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &amp;quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&amp;quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New norms violate RTE, says panel</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . <br /><br />The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. <br /><br />The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. <br /><br />According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&quot; <br /><br />Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . <br /><br />The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&quot; <br /><br />DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &quot;Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&quot; <br /><br />Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year's criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&quot; <br /><br />But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &quot;We will continue with out last year's policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&quot; <br /><br />Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 4854,
		'title' => 'New norms violate RTE, says panel',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . <br />
<br />
The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. <br />
<br />
The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. <br />
<br />
According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&quot; <br />
<br />
Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . <br />
<br />
The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&quot; <br />
<br />
DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &quot;Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&quot; <br />
<br />
Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year's criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&quot; <br />
<br />
But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &quot;We will continue with out last year's policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&quot; <br />
<br />
Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .<br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 December, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4945,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 4854,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Education',
	'metaDesc' => '

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . <br /><br />The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. <br /><br />The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. <br /><br />According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&quot; <br /><br />Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . <br /><br />The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&quot; <br /><br />DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &quot;Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&quot; <br /><br />Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year's criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&quot; <br /><br />But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &quot;We will continue with out last year's policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&quot; <br /><br />Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .<br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 4854,
	'title' => 'New norms violate RTE, says panel',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . <br />
<br />
The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. <br />
<br />
The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. <br />
<br />
According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&quot; <br />
<br />
Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . <br />
<br />
The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&quot; <br />
<br />
DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &quot;Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&quot; <br />
<br />
Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year's criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&quot; <br />
<br />
But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &quot;We will continue with out last year's policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&quot; <br />
<br />
Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .<br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 December, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/New-norms-violate-RTE-says-panel/articleshow/7121006.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'new-norms-violate-rte-says-panel-4945',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4945,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 4854
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms violate RTE, says panel'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Education'
$metaDesc = '

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . <br /><br />The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. <br /><br />The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. <br /><br />According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , &quot;No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem .&quot; <br /><br />Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . <br /><br />The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . &quot;From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct.&quot; <br /><br />DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : &quot;Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued.&quot; <br /><br />Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year's criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , &quot;A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion .&quot; <br /><br />But a principal of a South Delhi school said : &quot;We will continue with out last year's policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage .&quot; <br /><br />Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . &quot;Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ,&quot; said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .<br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

New norms violate RTE, says panel

Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) on Friday issued noticetothedepartment of education (DoE),Delhi government , over issuing of guidelines for admission in preprimary and class-I saying they violate the provisions of theRighttoF ree andCompulsory Education Act, 2009. in Its notice to the principal secretary , education , the commission has asked the department to re-examine the order . The guidelines were issued by DoEon Wednesday . The notice says that Delhi governmenthas given itsown interpretations of the RTE Act and made obvious changes that directly contravene the provisionsof theAct. The commission said while the guidelines of the Union HRD ministry and Delhi Government adhered to the random selection system for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS ), the selection of rest of the 75% seats is in violation of the provisions of the RTEAct. According to chairperson of DCPCR, Amod K Kanth , "No guidelines can be issued in contravention of the RTE Act. As per the provisions of the Act, the only criterion is the neighbourhood and random selection . In earlier cases ,thecommission has noticed that schools under the pointsystem give a maximum of 20 point to neighbourhood andin mostcasesit rangedbetween 5 and 10 points . As per theRTEAct,onecannot make any distinction between children , and no parents would likethe pointsystem ." Since the Act came into effect on April 1, 2010, DCPCR has received over 10,600 complaints of violations of the Act,of which around 9,000 are on denialof admissions . The commission , took cognizance of the statements made by the education minister , Arvinder Singh . "From his statements , it is clear that multiple criteria have been introduced for schools admissions , and this would create preferences for certain types of categories of children over other categories . This would beclear violation of the provisionsof RTEAct." DCPCR is the not only one to raiseobjectionstothelatest guidelines . Social jurist , Ashok Agarwal , in a statement , said : "Delhi government's directive of December 12, 2010, on nursery admissions guidelines is simply an order having no legal sanctity and , therefore , has no legal consequences . The order is neither under the provisions of RTE Act, 2009, nor under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 . Nor it is under any other law . The order does not spell out under which provisions of lawithasbeen issued." Meanwhile , schools are gearing up for drawing admission policy . While some schools have decided in principle to stick to last year's criteria ,others are yettotake a final call . According to principal of Ahlcon International School , Mayur Vihar , "A final decision is pending . The neighbourhood criterion is our priority , followed by the sibling criterion ." But a principal of a South Delhi school said : "We will continue with out last year's policy where sibling and alumni criteria will be given maximum weightage ." Then there are schools which are likely to stick to neighbourhood criterion . "Since a lotof people residing in the neighbourhood work with the Central government and PSUs and their jobs are transferable we will take transfer case as one of the criteria ," said Usha Ram , principalof Laxman Public School .