Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers/714746/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4460,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers/714746/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4460,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4369
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.</font><br /><br /><font >A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.</font><br /><br /><font >The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.</font><br /><br /><font >The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.</font><br /><br /><font >The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.</font><br /><br /><font >Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.</font><br /><br /><font >The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.</font><br /><br /><font >While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. </font><br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers/714746/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4460,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers/714746/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4460,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4369
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.</font><br /><br /><font >A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.</font><br /><br /><font >The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.</font><br /><br /><font >The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.</font><br /><br /><font >The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.</font><br /><br /><font >Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.</font><br /><br /><font >The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.</font><br /><br /><font >While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. </font><br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680dc86ef2925-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers/714746/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4460,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4369,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 23 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers/714746/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4460,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4369
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp;amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.</font><br /><br /><font >A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.</font><br /><br /><font >The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.</font><br /><br /><font >The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.</font><br /><br /><font >The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.</font><br /><br /><font >Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.</font><br /><br /><font >The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.</font><br /><br /><font >While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. </font><br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 4369,
		'title' => 'Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br />
</font>
<div align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. </font><br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers/714746/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4460,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 4369,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Environment',
	'metaDesc' => '


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect...',
	'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.</font><br /><br /><font >A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.</font><br /><br /><font >The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.</font><br /><br /><font >The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.</font><br /><br /><font >The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.</font><br /><br /><font >Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.</font><br /><br /><font >The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.</font><br /><br /><font >While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. </font><br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 4369,
	'title' => 'Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br />
</font>
<div align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. </font><br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 23 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers/714746/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'nirma-plant-sc-holds-out-hope-for-mahuva-farmers-4460',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4460,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 4369
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers'
$metaKeywords = 'Environment'
$metaDesc = '


The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect...'
$disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment &amp; Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site.</font><br /><br /><font >A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee.</font><br /><br /><font >The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya.</font><br /><br /><font >The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers.</font><br /><br /><font >The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress.</font><br /><br /><font >Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court.</font><br /><br /><font >The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal.</font><br /><br /><font >While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project. </font><br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Nirma plant: SC holds out hope for Mahuva farmers

The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Union Ministry of Environment & Forest (MoEF) to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant by Nirma Limited in Mahuva taluka of Bhavnagar district would pollute or adversely affect the water body on the site. A three-judge SC bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadiya, Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice K S Radhakrishnan issued the notice while hearing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shree Mahua Bandhara Khetiwadi Pariyavaran Bachav Samittee. The petitioner, a group of farmers from around Mahuva, had challenged the order of the Gujarat High Court allowing Nirma to go ahead with its plant on the land allotted by the state government. Originally, the state government had allotted 268 hectares of land in the region to Nirma to set up the cement plant in 2008, triggering mass protests by local farmers led by BJP MLA Dr Kanu Kalsariya. The Samittee had filed a PIL in the HC seeking direction to the state government to cancel the land allotment claiming it would jeopardize the local ecology and livelihood of the farmers. The petition argued that out of the 268 hectares of land allotted to Nirma, 222 hectares was part of a water body, which had come into existence after prolonged efforts to build check dams in the region to check salinity ingress. Nirma had proposed to surrender 54 hectares of the allotted land. Subsequently, HC had dismissed the petition and allowed Nirma to go ahead with the cement plant. The petitioner had moved a review petition in the HC against this order. However, the review petition was also dismissed by the HC following which the petitioner preferred an SLP in the apex court. The SLP was heard by the three-judge bench of SC on Monday. The petitioner was represented by senior counsel Harish Salve along with advocate Kamini Jaiswal. While asking the MOEF to file its reply on whether the proposed cement plant would pollute or adversely affect the water body or the region as a whole, the SC bench also made oral observation that if the MoEF gives answers to its queries against Nirma, it would scrap the project.