Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 3 January, 2016, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/macro-economy/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes/article8061677.ece?&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678235,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;rural poverty,SECC 2011,socio economic and caste census,poverty estimates,poverty measures,NITI Aayog,Housing,poverty indicators&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 3 January, 2016, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/macro-economy/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes/article8061677.ece?&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678235,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 30176
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;rural poverty,SECC 2011,socio economic and caste census,poverty estimates,poverty measures,NITI Aayog,Housing,poverty indicators&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.<br /><br />&ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.<br /><br />&ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.<br /><br />According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &mdash; for rural poor &mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &mdash; for urban poor &mdash; or the Statistical Commission.<br /><br /><em>Census in the works<br /></em><br />The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.<br /><br />The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&rdquo; another official added.<br /><br />The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 3 January, 2016, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/macro-economy/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes/article8061677.ece?&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678235,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;rural poverty,SECC 2011,socio economic and caste census,poverty estimates,poverty measures,NITI Aayog,Housing,poverty indicators&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 3 January, 2016, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/macro-economy/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes/article8061677.ece?&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678235,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 30176
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;rural poverty,SECC 2011,socio economic and caste census,poverty estimates,poverty measures,NITI Aayog,Housing,poverty indicators&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.<br /><br />&ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.<br /><br />&ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.<br /><br />According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &mdash; for rural poor &mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &mdash; for urban poor &mdash; or the Statistical Commission.<br /><br /><em>Census in the works<br /></em><br />The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.<br /><br />The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&rdquo; another official added.<br /><br />The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f03b2232d34-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 3 January, 2016, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/macro-economy/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes/article8061677.ece?&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678235,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;rural poverty,SECC 2011,socio economic and caste census,poverty estimates,poverty measures,NITI Aayog,Housing,poverty indicators&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30176,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 3 January, 2016, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/macro-economy/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes/article8061677.ece?&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678235,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 30176
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;rural poverty,SECC 2011,socio economic and caste census,poverty estimates,poverty measures,NITI Aayog,Housing,poverty indicators&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&amp;hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&amp;rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&amp;rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &amp;mdash; for rural poor &amp;mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &amp;mdash; for urban poor &amp;mdash; or the Statistical Commission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Census in the works&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &amp;ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&amp;rdquo; another official added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.<br /><br />&ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.<br /><br />&ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.<br /><br />According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &mdash; for rural poor &mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &mdash; for urban poor &mdash; or the Statistical Commission.<br /><br /><em>Census in the works<br /></em><br />The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.<br /><br />The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&rdquo; another official added.<br /><br />The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 30176,
		'title' => 'NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu Business Line<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.<br />
<br />
According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &mdash; for rural poor &mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &mdash; for urban poor &mdash; or the Statistical Commission.<br />
<br />
<em>Census in the works<br />
</em><br />
The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.<br />
<br />
The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&rdquo; another official added.<br />
<br />
The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu Business Line, 3 January, 2016, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/macro-economy/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes/article8061677.ece?',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4678235,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 30176,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes',
	'metaKeywords' => 'rural poverty,SECC 2011,socio economic and caste census,poverty estimates,poverty measures,NITI Aayog,Housing,poverty indicators',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.<br /><br />&ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.<br /><br />&ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.<br /><br />According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &mdash; for rural poor &mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &mdash; for urban poor &mdash; or the Statistical Commission.<br /><br /><em>Census in the works<br /></em><br />The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.<br /><br />The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&rdquo; another official added.<br /><br />The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 30176,
	'title' => 'NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu Business Line<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.<br />
<br />
According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &mdash; for rural poor &mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &mdash; for urban poor &mdash; or the Statistical Commission.<br />
<br />
<em>Census in the works<br />
</em><br />
The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.<br />
<br />
The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&rdquo; another official added.<br />
<br />
The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu Business Line, 3 January, 2016, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/macro-economy/niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes/article8061677.ece?',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'niti-aayog-task-force-may-suggest-separate-poverty-indicators-for-social-schemes-4678235',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4678235,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 30176
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes'
$metaKeywords = 'rural poverty,SECC 2011,socio economic and caste census,poverty estimates,poverty measures,NITI Aayog,Housing,poverty indicators'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu Business Line

New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing.<br /><br />&ldquo;A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes&hellip; Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,&rdquo; said an official associated with the task force.<br /><br />&ldquo;With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,&rdquo; Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen.<br /><br />According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry &mdash; for rural poor &mdash; and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry &mdash; for urban poor &mdash; or the Statistical Commission.<br /><br /><em>Census in the works<br /></em><br />The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12.<br /><br />The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, &ldquo;also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,&rdquo; another official added.<br /><br />The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

NITI Aayog task force may suggest separate poverty indicators for social schemes

-The Hindu Business Line New Delhi: The issue of one poverty number continues to absorb the NITI Aayog, and indications are that its task force on elimination of poverty will suggest having separate indicators for different social schemes such as health and housing. “A debate has been on within the task force on whether there should be one poverty number or separate indicators for different schemes… Discussions are also taking place on whether the Aayog should actually get involved defining the numbers at all,” said an official associated with the task force. “With the task force yet to submit its final report, the NITI Aayog has not taken a firm view on it,” Bibek Debroy, a member of both the NITI Aayog and the task force, told BusinessLine. The task force was to give the report to the States by June 15, 2015 and thereafter process their comments to prepare a final draft within the next the two weeks. A presentation was to be made to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in November. But that did not happen. According to a discussion paper circulated by the task force last year, in case one poverty number is required, it may not be necessarily calculated by the NITI Aayog, but jointly by the Rural Development Ministry — for rural poor — and the Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry — for urban poor — or the Statistical Commission. Census in the works The Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry is carrying out a census, which will throw up a number for the urban poor. Calculation on rural poverty is based on the 2011 Socio Economic and Caste Census of the Rural Development Ministry. The Ministry has reportedly classified 31.26 per cent of rural households as poor based on four of seven indicators. The Rangarajan Committee, a technical expert group set up by the UPA government in 2012, had classified 30.95 per cent of rural Indians as poor in 2011-12. The reason for the NITI Aayog soft-pedalling the poverty number issue, according to another official, “also arises from the fact whether the Aayog should actually be involving itself with numbers and deviating from its real mandate of being a think-tank for policy issues,” another official added. The task force, headed by NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya, includes besides Bibek Debroy, Chief Statistician TCA Anant, economist Surjit Bhalla, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Director Rathin Roy, and secretaries to the ministries/departments of rural development, housing and urban poverty alleviation, financial services, MSME and skill development.