Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13402, 'title' => 'Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 6 March, 2012, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=TOINEW&amp;BaseHref=CAP/2012/03/06&amp;PageLabel=11&amp;EntityI', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13524, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13402, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Hunger,Malnutrition,PDS', 'metaDesc' => ' States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13402, 'title' => 'Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 6 March, 2012, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=TOINEW&amp;BaseHref=CAP/2012/03/06&amp;PageLabel=11&amp;EntityI', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13524, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13402 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Hunger,Malnutrition,PDS' $metaDesc = ' States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre’s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This year, we will break last year’s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don’t see any problem,” the agriculture minister said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress’s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states’ below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress’s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13402, 'title' => 'Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 6 March, 2012, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=TOINEW&amp;BaseHref=CAP/2012/03/06&amp;PageLabel=11&amp;EntityI', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13524, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13402, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Hunger,Malnutrition,PDS', 'metaDesc' => ' States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13402, 'title' => 'Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 6 March, 2012, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=TOINEW&amp;BaseHref=CAP/2012/03/06&amp;PageLabel=11&amp;EntityI', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13524, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13402 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Hunger,Malnutrition,PDS' $metaDesc = ' States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre’s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This year, we will break last year’s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don’t see any problem,” the agriculture minister said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress’s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states’ below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress’s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f75c68ad91f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13402, 'title' => 'Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 6 March, 2012, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=TOINEW&amp;BaseHref=CAP/2012/03/06&amp;PageLabel=11&amp;EntityI', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13524, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13402, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Hunger,Malnutrition,PDS', 'metaDesc' => ' States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13402, 'title' => 'Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 6 March, 2012, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&amp;Source=Page&amp;Skin=TOINEW&amp;BaseHref=CAP/2012/03/06&amp;PageLabel=11&amp;EntityI', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13524, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13402 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Hunger,Malnutrition,PDS' $metaDesc = ' States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre&rsquo;s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This year, we will break last year&rsquo;s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don&rsquo;t see any problem,&rdquo; the agriculture minister said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress&rsquo;s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states&rsquo; below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress&rsquo;s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre’s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This year, we will break last year’s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don’t see any problem,” the agriculture minister said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress’s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states’ below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress’s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13402, 'title' => 'Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre’s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “This year, we will break last year’s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don’t see any problem,” the agriculture minister said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Congress’s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states’ below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress’s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 6 March, 2012, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2012/03/06&PageLabel=11&EntityI', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13524, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13402, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Hunger,Malnutrition,PDS', 'metaDesc' => ' States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre’s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This year, we will break last year’s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don’t see any problem,” the agriculture minister said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress’s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states’ below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress’s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13402, 'title' => 'Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre’s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “This year, we will break last year’s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don’t see any problem,” the agriculture minister said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Congress’s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states’ below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress’s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 6 March, 2012, http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2012/03/06&PageLabel=11&EntityI', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nitish-jaya-didi-troika-opposes-food-bill-now-by-nitin-sethi-13524', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13524, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13402 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security,Hunger,Malnutrition,PDS' $metaDesc = ' States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre’s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This year, we will break last year’s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don’t see any problem,” the agriculture minister said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Congress’s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states’ below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress’s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Nitish, Jaya, Didi troika opposes food bill now by Nitin Sethi |
States are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law The UPA can face a political alignment against the National Food Security bill similar to what it did on the National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC). Major states are opposed to provisions of the bill that seek to mandate who are the beneficiaries of the proposed law. J Jayalalithaa in Tamil Nadu, Nitish Kumar in Bihar and, most worryingly for the UPA Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal have all opposed the Centre’s view that it would decide the number of beneficiaries under the food security scheme in each state based on a standard formula. Some like Tamil Nadu argue that the number of beneficiaries will decrease. Their opposition needs to be softened although Congress got a breather with NCP boss Sharad Pawar making a near U-turn and speaking in favour of the bill he has questioned for more than a year. “This year, we will break last year’s record by reaching 250 million tonnes of foodgrains. With this background, to implement the Food Security bill, I don’t see any problem,” the agriculture minister said. He had previously warned of problems that could arise in implementing the bill and his ministry (agriculture) had on several occasions warned that there were not enough foodgrains to meet projected demands. Congress’s worries would now be concerned on convincing Banerjee to support the bill. The West Bengal chief minister avoided meeting Union food minister K V Thomas during his twoday visit to Kolkata. The Trinamool Congress chief had earlier in a written submission to the Union government opposed key proposals in the bill currently being considered by a parliamentary standing committee. The current bill proposes that the Centre decide the total number of beneficiaries in each state by sifting people out on the basis of the socioeconomic caste Census currently underway. Banerjee along with Jayalalithaa and Kumar have opposed this particular provision besides others reiterating that it should be the perogative of the state governments to decide and select beneficiaries. Kumar is insistent that states’ below poverty line lists should be given due weightage and they be allowed a say in beneficiaries. Several states already run a more elaborate food security scheme and it would be a political disaster for the regional leaders to cut access to those enjoying the benefits. While the bill itself is before the Parliamentary standing committee the criteria to be used for demarcating the beneficiaries is yet to be decided by the Centre. A panel, headed by Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, was to do so but it has not met once since its formation a few months ago. The survey too has been delayed in several states. All these issues could hamper a timely roll out of Congress’s flagship scheme and a pet project of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.
|