Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10471, 'title' => 'No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /> <br /> In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /> <br /> The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /> <br /> Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2539202.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10582, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10471, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'metaKeywords' => 'Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /><br />&nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />&ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10471, 'title' => 'No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /> <br /> In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /> <br /> The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /> <br /> Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2539202.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10582, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10471 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts' $metaKeywords = 'Environment' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,...' $disp = '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /><br />&nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />&ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these — an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown “willingness to comply with these stipulations”.<br /><br /> However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />“As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL," the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.”<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10471, 'title' => 'No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /> <br /> In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /> <br /> The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /> <br /> Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2539202.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10582, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10471, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'metaKeywords' => 'Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /><br />&nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />&ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10471, 'title' => 'No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /> <br /> In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /> <br /> The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /> <br /> Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2539202.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10582, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10471 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts' $metaKeywords = 'Environment' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,...' $disp = '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /><br />&nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />&ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these — an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown “willingness to comply with these stipulations”.<br /><br /> However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />“As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL," the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.”<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045fefaa28f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10471, 'title' => 'No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /> <br /> In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /> <br /> The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /> <br /> Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2539202.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10582, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10471, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'metaKeywords' => 'Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /><br />&nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />&ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10471, 'title' => 'No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /> <br /> In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /> <br /> The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /> <br /> Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2539202.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10582, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10471 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts' $metaKeywords = 'Environment' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,...' $disp = '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these &mdash; an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown &ldquo;willingness to comply with these stipulations&rdquo;.<br /><br />&nbsp;However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />&ldquo;As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL,&quot; the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.&rdquo;<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these — an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown “willingness to comply with these stipulations”.<br /><br /> However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />“As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL," the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.”<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10471, 'title' => 'No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /> <br /> In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these — an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown “willingness to comply with these stipulations”.<br /> <br /> However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /> <br /> “As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL," the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.”<br /> <br /> Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /> <br /> The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /> <br /> Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2539202.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10582, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10471, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'metaKeywords' => 'Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these — an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown “willingness to comply with these stipulations”.<br /><br /> However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />“As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL," the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.”<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10471, 'title' => 'No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /> <br /> In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these — an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown “willingness to comply with these stipulations”.<br /> <br /> However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /> <br /> “As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL," the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.”<br /> <br /> Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /> <br /> The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /> <br /> Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2539202.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-clearance-for-lavasa-till-maharashtra-acts-10582', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10582, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10471 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts' $metaKeywords = 'Environment' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government. In its order,...' $disp = '<p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.<br /><br />In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these — an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown “willingness to comply with these stipulations”.<br /><br /> However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law.<br /><br />“As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL," the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.”<br /><br />Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court.<br /><br />The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said.<br /><br />Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
No clearance for Lavasa till Maharashtra acts |
-The Hindu
The Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has refused to grant a clearance to Lavasa's ambitious lake city project in the hills near Pune, and it's putting the blame on the shoulders of the Maharashtra government.
In its order, dated October 13, MoEF notes that in its June order and affidavit to the Bombay High Court, it was willing to clear Lavasa's first phase, subject to five preconditions. Lavasa was responsible for four of these — an environmental restoration fund, five per cent of profits earmarked for CSR, a revised development plan and a commitment not to further violate green norms. The Ministry now says that the company has shown “willingness to comply with these stipulations”. However, the first pre-condition remains unfulfilled: the state government must take credible action against the company for violations of environmental law. “As the pre-condition on the credible action on violation of EIA Notification, 2006 has not been complied with, the Ministry is unable to issue the Environmental Clearance to the first phase of Hill City project (2000 ha) of M/s LCL," the Ministry's order said. The final decision on the Environmental Clearance cannot be taken till all the pre conditions are met including credible action by the State Government of Maharashtra and subject to the-final orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay as the matter is sub-judice.” Official sources said the Maharashtra government was asked to take action by the MoEF under the Environment Protection Act. However, Lavasa had stated that the Environment Impact assessment (EIA) notification of 2004 was not applicable to it and most of the violations emerged only if that notification was applied. However, the EIA notification of 2006 was applicable and the matter was raised in the public interest litigation (PIL) in the High Court. The state government had sought legal opinion as the matter was in court. The environment department sought a clarification from the MOEF in July on the issue with a reminder in September. The clarification is still awaited by the state government. In any case, Tuesday (October 18) is the day for the matter in the High Court and the state government will wait till then before taking a decision, the sources said. Last month, the Bombay High Court gave an ultimatum to MoEF directing it to pass the final order in the Lavasa matter within three weeks. The MoEF had written a letter to the state government on June 10 directing it to take action against Lavasa for violation of environmental norms. Since then the matter has been mired in court cases. |