Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 4 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/No-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams/articleshow/20418331.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21390,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education,RTE,education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 4 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/No-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams/articleshow/20418331.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21390,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21245
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education,RTE,education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.</p><p align="justify">It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.</p><p align="justify">No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.</p><p align="justify">The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.</p><p align="justify">As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.</p><p align="justify">A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 4 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/No-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams/articleshow/20418331.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21390,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education,RTE,education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 4 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/No-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams/articleshow/20418331.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21390,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21245
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education,RTE,education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.</p><p align="justify">It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.</p><p align="justify">No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.</p><p align="justify">The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.</p><p align="justify">As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.</p><p align="justify">A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa9655ae279-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 4 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/No-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams/articleshow/20418331.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21390,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Education,RTE,education&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21245,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 4 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/No-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams/articleshow/20418331.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21390,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21245
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Education,RTE,education&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp;amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.</p><p align="justify">It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.</p><p align="justify">No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.</p><p align="justify">The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.</p><p align="justify">As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.</p><p align="justify">A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 21245,
		'title' => '‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>NEW DELHI: </em>No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.
</p>
<p align="justify">
No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.
</p>
<p align="justify">
As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. 
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/No-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams/articleshow/20418331.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 21390,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 21245,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Education,RTE,education',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.</p><p align="justify">It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.</p><p align="justify">No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.</p><p align="justify">The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.</p><p align="justify">As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.</p><p align="justify">A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. </p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 21245,
	'title' => '‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>NEW DELHI: </em>No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.
</p>
<p align="justify">
No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.
</p>
<p align="justify">
As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. 
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/No-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams/articleshow/20418331.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'no-detention-doesnt-mean-no-exams-akshaya-mukul-21390',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 21390,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 21245
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Education,RTE,education'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India



NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009.</p><p align="justify">It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted.</p><p align="justify">No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy.</p><p align="justify">The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous &amp; Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12.</p><p align="justify">As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I.</p><p align="justify">A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

‘No detention doesn’t mean no exams’ -Akshaya Mukul

-The Times of India NEW DELHI: No-detention provision in the Right to Education (RTE) Act is being touted as a big barrier towards quality education but a comprehensive report by the HRD ministry has revealed that 25 states already had no-detention policy even before the historical law came into force in 2009. It has also been revealed through analysis of District Information of System of Education data that learning ability in states with no-detention is on the rise. The report clarifies no-detention does not mean no examination should be conducted. No detention ranged from class III to VIII. In Andhra Pradesh, no detention from class I to VI has been prevalent since 1975. Examination was only till class VII, but even before the RTE came into the force it was extended up to class IX. Take the other big states. In Haryana, no detention is followed till class III since 1979. Himachal Pradesh that protested against the no-detention provision was practicing it class III and from 2009 it has been extended up to 2009. In Madhya Pradesh, no child was failed from class I to VI before RTE was introduced. In Maharashtra, no detention till class II is in practice since 2001, and in Uttar Pradesh from even earlier. In West Bengal, children are held back till class IV since 1984. In Tamil Nadu, no detention till class till class V has been in vogue since 1998. Only seven states did not have no-detention policy. The HRD report while setting straight many misconceptions about Continuous & Comprehensive Evaluation said 25 states have fully implemented it, and introduced some kind of written examination that ranges from paper pencil test, semester end test, summative as well as formative assessment. The report points out that the annual drop out rate was 9.1% in 2009-10, a year before the RTE came into force, which further dropped to 6.8% in 2010-11 and 6.5% in 2011-12. Repetition rate, percentage of students repeating same class, was 3.9% in 2009-10, which went up to 5.1% in 2010-11 and further came down to 3.2% in 2011-12. As for the learning ability of class III students in states with detention policy it was found that in Round I of the NCERT survey (2003-04) mean math percentage was 68.54% that fell to 65.75% in Round II (2007-08). In language it fell from 74.84% in Round I to 62.7% in Round II. In states with no detention policy mean math percentage went up from 56.7% in Round I to 59.1% in Round II. A bigger jump could be noticed in language mean percentage: 65.8% in Round II from 61.4% in Round I. A bigger decline in learning ability could be noticed in case of class V in six states that did not follow no detention. In mathematics it fell from 53.75% to 42.63%, in language from 58.16% to 57.86% and in environmental studies from 57.86% to 48.88% from Round I to Round II of NCERT survey. In states with no detention policy mean percentage in mathematics went up to 46.5% in Round II from 44.29% in Round I and 59.02% in language in Round II from 57.02%.