Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7003, 'title' => 'No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /> <br /> Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /> <br /> Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /> <br /> The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /> <br /> The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /> <br /> <em>Poverty cap<br /> </em><br /> Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /> <br /> The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /> <br /> While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /> <br /> As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /> <br /> The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /> <br /> In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /> <br /> These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /> <br /> Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/11/stories/2011041161330700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7100, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7003, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty', 'metaDesc' => ' Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7003, 'title' => 'No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /> <br /> Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /> <br /> Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /> <br /> The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /> <br /> The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /> <br /> <em>Poverty cap<br /> </em><br /> Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /> <br /> The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /> <br /> While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /> <br /> As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /> <br /> The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /> <br /> In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /> <br /> These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /> <br /> Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/11/stories/2011041161330700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7100, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7003 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty' $metaDesc = ' Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7003, 'title' => 'No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /> <br /> Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /> <br /> Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /> <br /> The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /> <br /> The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /> <br /> <em>Poverty cap<br /> </em><br /> Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /> <br /> The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /> <br /> While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /> <br /> As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /> <br /> The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /> <br /> In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /> <br /> These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /> <br /> Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/11/stories/2011041161330700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7100, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7003, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty', 'metaDesc' => ' Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7003, 'title' => 'No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /> <br /> Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /> <br /> Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /> <br /> The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /> <br /> The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /> <br /> <em>Poverty cap<br /> </em><br /> Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /> <br /> The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /> <br /> While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /> <br /> As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /> <br /> The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /> <br /> In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /> <br /> These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /> <br /> Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/11/stories/2011041161330700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7100, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7003 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty' $metaDesc = ' Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eb06a50e94c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7003, 'title' => 'No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /> <br /> Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /> <br /> Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /> <br /> The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /> <br /> The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /> <br /> <em>Poverty cap<br /> </em><br /> Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /> <br /> The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /> <br /> While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /> <br /> As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /> <br /> The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /> <br /> In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /> <br /> These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /> <br /> Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/11/stories/2011041161330700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7100, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7003, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty', 'metaDesc' => ' Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7003, 'title' => 'No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /> <br /> Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /> <br /> Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /> <br /> The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /> <br /> The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /> <br /> <em>Poverty cap<br /> </em><br /> Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /> <br /> The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /> <br /> While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /> <br /> As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /> <br /> The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /> <br /> In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /> <br /> These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /> <br /> Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/11/stories/2011041161330700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7100, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7003 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty' $metaDesc = ' Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7003, 'title' => 'No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /> <br /> Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /> <br /> Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /> <br /> The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /> <br /> The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /> <br /> <em>Poverty cap<br /> </em><br /> Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /> <br /> The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /> <br /> While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /> <br /> As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /> <br /> The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /> <br /> In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /> <br /> These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /> <br /> Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/11/stories/2011041161330700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7100, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 7003, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty', 'metaDesc' => ' Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 7003, 'title' => 'No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /> <br /> Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /> <br /> Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /> <br /> The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /> <br /> The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /> <br /> <em>Poverty cap<br /> </em><br /> Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /> <br /> The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /> <br /> While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /> <br /> As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /> <br /> The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /> <br /> In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /> <br /> These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /> <br /> Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/11/stories/2011041161330700.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-direct-inclusion-of-sc-st-in-bpl-list-by-k-balchand-7100', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 7100, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 7003 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty' $metaDesc = ' Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.<br /><br />Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community.<br /><br />Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land.<br /><br />The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha.<br /><br />The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option.<br /><br /><em>Poverty cap<br /></em><br />Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population.<br /><br />The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population.<br /><br />While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages.<br /><br />As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones.<br /><br />The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour.<br /><br />In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting.<br /><br />These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained.<br /><br />Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
No direct inclusion of SC, ST in BPL list by K Balchand |
Reconsidering its earlier decision, the United Progressive Alliance government is now contemplating not to give direct inclusion to all members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities in the proposed BPL list if one goes by the modalities being laid out for conducting the census.
Their inclusion will now be based on their ranking obtained from the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy. Similarly, minorities too don't get the same kind of importance that the Centre had initially intended to give the community. Only six categories of people will be compulsorily included in the BPL list, until, of course, the exclusion criteria is applied to them. The six category of households which will stand to benefit are the designated primitive tribal groups, most discriminated SC groups called Mahadalit groups where so identified by the State, female headed households with no adult male member, minor head of households with no adult member, destitute households which are dependent predominantly on alms for survival, and households that are homeless or with no homestead land. The Centre has modified the N.C.Saxena committee recommendations in the light of the pilot project it carried out in 254 villages cross the country testing its efficacy in listing the BPL households and following the demands made by several groups, said Union Rural Development Ministry B.K.Sinha. The danger of including all the SC and ST category households was the threat of other groups of more deprived sections being elbowed out, contended Mr. Sinha, who regarded the adopted course as the best option. Poverty cap Moreover, the government doesn't want to defy the poverty cap suggested by the Tendulkar committee. Planning Commission Member Mihir Shah has in his proposal accepted the separate caps suggested by the committee for different States to avoid any controversy. The recommended poverty cap at the national level is 42 percent of the rural population. The six compulsorily included categories will account for about 3 percent to 4 percent of the BPL population. While one section will be subjected to the automatic exclusion criteria, others will have to come good on the scoring formula, which has been so formulated as to rank the villages on a poverty scale giving preference to those which are ranked as the most deprived villages. As per the exclusion criteria at least 28 per cent of the rural population is expected to be placed in the relative will-being status. Households placed in this category are those owning 2.5 acres of irrigated land, two-wheelers, mechanised agricultural equipment, government employment, or with a monthly salary of over Rs. 10000, paying income tax, having a three room house with pucca walls and roof, refrigerator and landline phones. The remaining households will then be ranked depending on the number of deprivation indicators they satisfy and these include being part of the SC/ST households, households with only one room with kucha wall and roof, with no literate adult above 25 years of age and households headed by landless agricultural labourer deriving the major part of income from agricultural labour. In a bid to lend flexibility to capture poverty in a specific State, the Planning Commission seeks to allow the States to include three specific indicators which they consider necessary to prioritise households for targeting. These deprivations will be added varying from a minimum 0 to maximum 7 listing the order of priority in the BPL list from the largest number of deprivations to smallest number of deprivations. The deprivation cut-off will be so chosen that the total percentage of households will be less than the prescribed cut-off poverty ratio. The objective was to suggest a sound methodology to identify the BPL population and it would be upto the government to suggest the cut off line to suite the needs of specific social welfare schemes, Mr. Shah explained. Mr. Shah has sent his proposal to Planning Committee Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for approval, which the Ministry of Rural Development will, in all probability, accept. |