Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-family-can-survive-on-Rs-11000-a-year-HC/articleshow/21905679.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22389,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,Economically Weaker Sections&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-family-can-survive-on-Rs-11000-a-year-HC/articleshow/21905679.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22389,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22239
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,Economically Weaker Sections&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BANGALORE: </em>The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.</p><p align="justify">Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government's failure.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.</p><p align="justify">&quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.</p><p align="justify">Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family's income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family's annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband's income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn't reply to the notice within the stipulated time.</p><p align="justify">A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-family-can-survive-on-Rs-11000-a-year-HC/articleshow/21905679.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22389,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,Economically Weaker Sections&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-family-can-survive-on-Rs-11000-a-year-HC/articleshow/21905679.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22389,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22239
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,Economically Weaker Sections&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BANGALORE: </em>The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.</p><p align="justify">Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government's failure.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.</p><p align="justify">&quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.</p><p align="justify">Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family's income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family's annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband's income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn't reply to the notice within the stipulated time.</p><p align="justify">A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fef1b5cfa91-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-family-can-survive-on-Rs-11000-a-year-HC/articleshow/21905679.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22389,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,Economically Weaker Sections&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22239,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 19 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-family-can-survive-on-Rs-11000-a-year-HC/articleshow/21905679.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22389,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22239
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,Economically Weaker Sections&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BANGALORE: &lt;/em&gt;The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government&#039;s failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&amp;quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&amp;quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family&#039;s income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family&#039;s annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband&#039;s income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn&#039;t reply to the notice within the stipulated time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BANGALORE: </em>The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.</p><p align="justify">Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government's failure.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.</p><p align="justify">&quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.</p><p align="justify">Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family's income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family's annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband's income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn't reply to the notice within the stipulated time.</p><p align="justify">A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 22239,
		'title' => 'No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>BANGALORE: </em>The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government's failure.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family's income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family's annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband's income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn't reply to the notice within the stipulated time.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. 
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 19 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-family-can-survive-on-Rs-11000-a-year-HC/articleshow/21905679.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 22389,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 22239,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,Economically Weaker Sections',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BANGALORE: </em>The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.</p><p align="justify">Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government's failure.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.</p><p align="justify">&quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.</p><p align="justify">Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family's income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family's annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband's income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn't reply to the notice within the stipulated time.</p><p align="justify">A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. </p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 22239,
	'title' => 'No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>BANGALORE: </em>The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government's failure.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family's income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family's annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband's income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn't reply to the notice within the stipulated time.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. 
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 19 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/No-family-can-survive-on-Rs-11000-a-year-HC/articleshow/21905679.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'no-family-can-survive-on-rs-11000-a-year-hc-p-vasanth-kumar-22389',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 22389,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 22239
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar'
$metaKeywords = 'Poverty,Economically Weaker Sections'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India



BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.


Observing that the government...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>BANGALORE: </em>The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category.</p><p align="justify">Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government's failure.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not,&quot; a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority.</p><p align="justify">&quot;On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made,&quot; the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench.</p><p align="justify">Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family's income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family's annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband's income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn't reply to the notice within the stipulated time.</p><p align="justify">A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

No family can survive on Rs 11,000 a year: HC -P Vasanth Kumar

-The Times of India BANGALORE: The Karnataka high court has wondered whether any family can survive on an annual income of less than Rs 11,800, the ceiling to apply for BDA sites under economically weaker sections (EWS) category. Observing that the government must revise the ceiling for all categories every year, the high court has said a beneficiary must not pay for government's failure. "The Rs 11,800 ceiling was fixed long ago. The same is required to be enhanced from time to time. There is a failure on the part of the government in not enhancing the income to determine (if) a person is eligible for EWS (sites) or not," a division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath has observed, dismissing a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority. "On account of the lapse committed by the government, a person cannot be penalized. Every year, the government is bound to fix the ceiling for all the categories. When there is a failure on the part of the government to do so, the authorities cannot set aside the order of allotment three years after the same was made," the bench has observed, upholding the December 9, 2009 order of the single-judge bench. Shakeerabi, from Ilyasnagar, had applied for an EWS site with a claim that her annual income is Rs 10,000. She was allotted a 20x30ft site, bearing No 464 at Sir M Visvesvaraya Layout on February 6, 2004. She paid Rs 56,000 for the site. Three years later, the BDA issued a show-cause notice to Shakeerabi, saying she had concealed the entire family's income and asked her why her site allotment should not be cancelled. Her family's annual earnings stood at Rs 21,000, factoring her husband's income, it said. On June 8, 2007, the BDA revoked the site allotment on the ground that she didn't reply to the notice within the stipulated time. A single-judge bench had quashed the cancellation of the site. Quoting Rule 2(d) of the BDA Rules, the judge had said what is required to be considered is the income of the applicant and not that of her husband. The BDA filed the writ appeal against the order.