Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18756, 'title' => '‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /> <br /> The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /> <br /> The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /> <br /> But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /> <br /> Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /> <br /> Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /> <br /> A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /> <br /> Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /> <br /> The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /> <br /> Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /> <br /> He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /> <br /> Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 15 January, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130115/jsp/nation/story_16442616.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18890, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 18756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'metaKeywords' => 'khap,Gender Equality,Law and Justice,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />&ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18756, 'title' => '‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /> <br /> The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /> <br /> The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /> <br /> But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /> <br /> Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /> <br /> Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /> <br /> A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /> <br /> Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /> <br /> The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /> <br /> Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /> <br /> He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /> <br /> Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 15 January, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130115/jsp/nation/story_16442616.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18890, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 18756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji' $metaKeywords = 'khap,Gender Equality,Law and Justice,Gender' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />&ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as “parallel courts”.<br /><br />“If a woman can’t wear proper dress, if girls can’t carry mobiles… it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,” a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court’s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: “You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.”<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana’s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years’ tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />“The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,” the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the “Taliban”. The court said: “It may have been a Freudian slip.”<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18756, 'title' => '‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /> <br /> The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /> <br /> The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /> <br /> But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /> <br /> Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /> <br /> Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /> <br /> A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /> <br /> Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /> <br /> The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /> <br /> Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /> <br /> He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /> <br /> Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 15 January, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130115/jsp/nation/story_16442616.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18890, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 18756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'metaKeywords' => 'khap,Gender Equality,Law and Justice,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />&ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18756, 'title' => '‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /> <br /> The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /> <br /> The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /> <br /> But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /> <br /> Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /> <br /> Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /> <br /> A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /> <br /> Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /> <br /> The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /> <br /> Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /> <br /> He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /> <br /> Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 15 January, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130115/jsp/nation/story_16442616.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18890, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 18756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji' $metaKeywords = 'khap,Gender Equality,Law and Justice,Gender' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />&ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as “parallel courts”.<br /><br />“If a woman can’t wear proper dress, if girls can’t carry mobiles… it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,” a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court’s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: “You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.”<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana’s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years’ tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />“The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,” the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the “Taliban”. The court said: “It may have been a Freudian slip.”<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6807ddb8612b1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18756, 'title' => '‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /> <br /> The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /> <br /> The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /> <br /> But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /> <br /> Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /> <br /> Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /> <br /> A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /> <br /> Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /> <br /> The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /> <br /> Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /> <br /> He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /> <br /> Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 15 January, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130115/jsp/nation/story_16442616.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18890, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 18756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'metaKeywords' => 'khap,Gender Equality,Law and Justice,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />&ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18756, 'title' => '‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /> <br /> The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /> <br /> The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /> <br /> But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /> <br /> Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /> <br /> Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /> <br /> A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /> <br /> Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /> <br /> The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /> <br /> Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /> <br /> He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /> <br /> Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 15 January, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130115/jsp/nation/story_16442616.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18890, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 18756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji' $metaKeywords = 'khap,Gender Equality,Law and Justice,Gender' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as &ldquo;parallel courts&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;If a woman can&rsquo;t wear proper dress, if girls can&rsquo;t carry mobiles&hellip; it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,&rdquo; a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court&rsquo;s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: &ldquo;You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.&rdquo;<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana&rsquo;s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years&rsquo; tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />&ldquo;The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,&rdquo; the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the &ldquo;Taliban&rdquo;. The court said: &ldquo;It may have been a Freudian slip.&rdquo;<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as “parallel courts”.<br /><br />“If a woman can’t wear proper dress, if girls can’t carry mobiles… it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,” a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court’s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: “You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.”<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana’s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years’ tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />“The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,” the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the “Taliban”. The court said: “It may have been a Freudian slip.”<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18756, 'title' => '‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /> <br /> The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as “parallel courts”.<br /> <br /> “If a woman can’t wear proper dress, if girls can’t carry mobiles… it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,” a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /> <br /> The court’s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /> <br /> But the bench said: “You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.”<br /> <br /> The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /> <br /> Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /> <br /> Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /> <br /> A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /> <br /> Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /> <br /> The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /> <br /> Haryana’s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years’ tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /> <br /> He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /> <br /> “The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,” the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /> <br /> Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the “Taliban”. The court said: “It may have been a Freudian slip.”<br /> <br /> The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 15 January, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130115/jsp/nation/story_16442616.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18890, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 18756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'metaKeywords' => 'khap,Gender Equality,Law and Justice,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as “parallel courts”.<br /><br />“If a woman can’t wear proper dress, if girls can’t carry mobiles… it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,” a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court’s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: “You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.”<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana’s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years’ tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />“The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,” the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the “Taliban”. The court said: “It may have been a Freudian slip.”<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18756, 'title' => '‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /> <br /> The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as “parallel courts”.<br /> <br /> “If a woman can’t wear proper dress, if girls can’t carry mobiles… it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,” a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /> <br /> The court’s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /> <br /> But the bench said: “You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.”<br /> <br /> The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /> <br /> Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /> <br /> Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /> <br /> A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /> <br /> Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /> <br /> The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /> <br /> Haryana’s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years’ tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /> <br /> He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /> <br /> “The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,” the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /> <br /> Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the “Taliban”. The court said: “It may have been a Freudian slip.”<br /> <br /> The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 15 January, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130115/jsp/nation/story_16442616.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-phone-glare-on-khaps-r-balaji-18890', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18890, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 18756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji' $metaKeywords = 'khap,Gender Equality,Law and Justice,Gender' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law.<br /><br />The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as “parallel courts”.<br /><br />“If a woman can’t wear proper dress, if girls can’t carry mobiles… it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,” a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed.<br /><br />The court’s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats.<br /><br />But the bench said: “You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.”<br /><br />The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings.<br /><br />Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal.<br /><br />Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra.<br /><br />A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work.<br /><br />Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide.<br /><br />The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner.<br /><br />Haryana’s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years’ tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings.<br /><br />He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings.<br /><br />“The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,” the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings.<br /><br />Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the “Taliban”. The court said: “It may have been a Freudian slip.”<br /><br />The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
‘No-phone’ glare on khaps -R Balaji |
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today ticked off police in three northern states for claiming no khap (caste) panchayats existed, observing that restricting girls from carrying mobile phones or wearing clothes of their choice violated the law. The apex court directed the khap panchayats of Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh to file their response on the legal validity of their functioning as “parallel courts”. “If a woman can’t wear proper dress, if girls can’t carry mobiles… it is also a violation of law. How can anyone say you cannot carry a mobile? It also violates the law,” a bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai observed. The court’s questions came when senior police officers contended that there were no khap panchayats. But the bench said: “You are trying to give a clean chit to khaps. You are trying to overcome the issue. This is the trial in which all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.” The court was hearing a public interest litigation petition filed by Shakti Vahini. The NGO had moved the apex court, seeking a ban on parallel courts that decide private matters like marriages, dress code and use of mobiles, besides encouraging honour killings. Additional solicitor-general Indira Jaising, appearing for the Union government, said that khap panchayats were engaged in preventing same gothra (intra-caste or sub-caste) marriages, which was illegal. Jasbir Singh Mallik, the counsel for some of the Haryana-based khaps, said the panchayats were basically opposed to Section 29 of the Hindu Marriages Act, which permitted marriages within the same gothra. A senior police officer from Meerut said that although the khaps were perhaps restricting the use of mobiles and, in some case, enforcing the dress code, they were also carrying out positive work. Asked by the bench to list the positive work, the officer said the khaps passed orders against female foeticide. The officials from other two states said that there were no honour killings or other illegal activities as alleged by the petitioner. Haryana’s additional director-general of police said that during his last five years’ tenure, he did not come across any incidents of khap panchayats being involved in honour killings. He submitted that there were individual incidents of elopement and the girl being killed by her brother or father. But the vendetta was not part of any organised khap panchayats, he added.However, Raju Ramachandran, a senior counsel appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), said khap panchayats had a profound influence on the members of their community as they normally excommunicated people or censured them, which resulted in honour killings. “The killings are only the tip of the iceberg. Tell us what is beyond the surface,” the court had asked the superintendents of Rohtak and Jhind in Haryana, who insisted that there were no instances of honour killings. Counsel for one of the khaps said the NGO was trying to portray them as the “Taliban”. The court said: “It may have been a Freudian slip.” The khaps have time till February 18 to file written submissions and the matter has been posted for final disposal on March 5. |