Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de70d44357-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de70d44357-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de70d44357-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11223, 'title' => 'No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /> <br /> Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /> <br /> Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /> <br /> With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /> <br /> The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /> <br /> With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /> <br /> On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /> <br /> &lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /> <br /> They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /> <br /> On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2636731.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11337, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11223, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'metaKeywords' => 'Civil Nuclear Deal,Energy', 'metaDesc' => ' On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /><br />&lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />&ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11223, 'title' => 'No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /> <br /> Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /> <br /> Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /> <br /> With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /> <br /> The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /> <br /> With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /> <br /> On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /> <br /> &lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /> <br /> They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /> <br /> On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2636731.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11337, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11223 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy' $metaKeywords = 'Civil Nuclear Deal,Energy' $metaDesc = ' On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /><br />&lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />&ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the “law of the land” could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. “We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,” an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an “obstacle” in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. “They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.”<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any ‘right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be ‘paramount.'<br /><br />‘Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in ‘good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. “The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.”<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />“Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,” the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. “We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.”<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de70d44357-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de70d44357-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de70d44357-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11223, 'title' => 'No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /> <br /> Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /> <br /> Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /> <br /> With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /> <br /> The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /> <br /> With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /> <br /> On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /> <br /> &lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /> <br /> They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /> <br /> On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2636731.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11337, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11223, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'metaKeywords' => 'Civil Nuclear Deal,Energy', 'metaDesc' => ' On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /><br />&lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />&ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11223, 'title' => 'No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /> <br /> Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /> <br /> Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /> <br /> With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /> <br /> The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /> <br /> With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /> <br /> On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /> <br /> &lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /> <br /> They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /> <br /> On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2636731.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11337, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11223 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy' $metaKeywords = 'Civil Nuclear Deal,Energy' $metaDesc = ' On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /><br />&lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />&ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the “law of the land” could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. “We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,” an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an “obstacle” in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. “They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.”<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any ‘right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be ‘paramount.'<br /><br />‘Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in ‘good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. “The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.”<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />“Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,” the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. “We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.”<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de70d44357-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de70d44357-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de70d44357-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de70d44357-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11223, 'title' => 'No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /> <br /> Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /> <br /> Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /> <br /> With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /> <br /> The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /> <br /> With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /> <br /> On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /> <br /> &lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /> <br /> They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /> <br /> On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2636731.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11337, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11223, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'metaKeywords' => 'Civil Nuclear Deal,Energy', 'metaDesc' => ' On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /><br />&lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />&ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11223, 'title' => 'No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /> <br /> Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /> <br /> Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /> <br /> With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /> <br /> The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /> <br /> With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /> <br /> On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /> <br /> &lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /> <br /> They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /> <br /> On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2636731.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11337, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11223 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy' $metaKeywords = 'Civil Nuclear Deal,Energy' $metaDesc = ' On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the &ldquo;law of the land&rdquo; could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. &ldquo;We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,&rdquo; an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an &ldquo;obstacle&rdquo; in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. &ldquo;They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.&rdquo;<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any &lsquo;right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be &lsquo;paramount.'<br /><br />&lsquo;Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in &lsquo;good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. &ldquo;The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />&ldquo;Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,&rdquo; the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. &ldquo;We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.&rdquo;<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the “law of the land” could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. “We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,” an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an “obstacle” in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. “They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.”<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any ‘right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be ‘paramount.'<br /><br />‘Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in ‘good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. “The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.”<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />“Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,” the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. “We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.”<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11223, 'title' => 'No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the “law of the land” could not be diluted.<br /> <br /> Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /> <br /> Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. “We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,” an official said.<br /> <br /> With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an “obstacle” in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. “They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.”<br /> <br /> The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /> <br /> The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any ‘right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /> <br /> With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /> <br /> On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be ‘paramount.'<br /> <br /> ‘Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /> <br /> They described the India-U.S. relations as in ‘good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. “The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.”<br /> <br /> On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /> <br /> “Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,” the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /> <br /> On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. “We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.”<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2636731.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11337, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11223, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'metaKeywords' => 'Civil Nuclear Deal,Energy', 'metaDesc' => ' On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the “law of the land” could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. “We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,” an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an “obstacle” in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. “They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.”<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any ‘right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be ‘paramount.'<br /><br />‘Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in ‘good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. “The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.”<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />“Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,” the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. “We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.”<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11223, 'title' => 'No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the “law of the land” could not be diluted.<br /> <br /> Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /> <br /> Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. “We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,” an official said.<br /> <br /> With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an “obstacle” in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. “They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.”<br /> <br /> The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /> <br /> The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any ‘right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /> <br /> With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /> <br /> On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be ‘paramount.'<br /> <br /> ‘Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /> <br /> They described the India-U.S. relations as in ‘good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /> <br /> The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. “The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.”<br /> <br /> On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /> <br /> “Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,” the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /> <br /> On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. “We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.”<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 17 November, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2636731.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-scope-for-change-in-liability-regime-india-will-tell-obama-by-b-muralidhar-reddy-11337', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11337, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11223 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy' $metaKeywords = 'Civil Nuclear Deal,Energy' $metaDesc = ' On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the “law of the land” could not be diluted.<br /><br />Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment.<br /><br />Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. “We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,” an official said.<br /><br />With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an “obstacle” in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. “They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.”<br /><br />The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010.<br /><br />The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any ‘right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to.<br /><br />With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules.<br /><br />On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be ‘paramount.'<br /><br />‘Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region.<br /><br />They described the India-U.S. relations as in ‘good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan.<br /><br />The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. “The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.”<br /><br />On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days.<br /><br />“Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,” the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon.<br /><br />On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. “We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.”<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
No scope for change in liability regime, India will tell Obama by B Muralidhar Reddy |
On the eve of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's scheduled meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama on the sidelines of the Asean summit in Bali, Indian officials said they did not know whether the newly notified rules for implementing the Nuclear Liability Act would address American concerns about nuclear suppliers being exposed to claims for damages in the event of an accident but insisted that the “law of the land” could not be diluted.
Since the adoption of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act by Parliament in August 2010, Washington has been demanding that the Indian legislation conform to international conventions which have more lenient provisions for the suppliers of nuclear equipment. Senior officials said the liability rules were within the framework of the liability law and Indian statute. “We do not know if the U.S. concerns are addressed in the new rules. The Indian position has been consistent. It can't be any one's case that the law of the land would not apply. There is supplier's liability in every law. We don't see the Liability for Nuclear Damages Act as any different,” an official said. With the subject likely to come up at Dr. Singh's meeting with Mr. Obama on Friday, the officials said neither the liability Act nor its implementation rules were an “obstacle” in the way of foreign nuclear companies wishing to do business in India. “They are consistent with Indian law and leave no scope for anyone to raise questions.” The scheduled 30-minute interaction will be the first proper meeting of the two countries at that level since the high-profile visit of the U.S. President to India in November 2010. The new liability rules open a window for suppliers to limit their exposure by making them liable only for accidents which occur within five years of a reactor licence being granted. A time and monetary limit would govern any ‘right of recourse' claims by Indian reactor operators for an accident caused by faulty equipment. But they leave untouched the right of victims to press for damages under ordinary tort law, something Washington has objected to. With the Fukushima atomic plant explosion fresh in mind and opposition within India from sections of political forces and civil society, the Manmohan Singh government cannot afford to be seen as soft on the issue. A section of the Opposition has already charged the government with pandering to foreign interests in framing the rules. On issues likely to figure in the interaction between Dr. Singh and Mr. Obama, the officials said progress on bilateral issues since the U.S. President's visit to India would be ‘paramount.' ‘Marine security' in the Indian Ocean is not expected to be the centrepiece of the talks. The officials conceded that the so-called heightened involvement of Beijing in the region had been a major concern to the U.S. allies in the East Asian region. They described the India-U.S. relations as in ‘good shape' and maintained that both countries were engaged in dialogue on a wide range of issues of mutual interest, not confined to Pakistan or Afghanistan. The Eurozone crisis and the domestic economic and political scenario within the U.S. might also figure in talks, the officials said. “The relationship between India and the U.S. is evolving and would keep evolving in tune with the dynamics of the changing ground situation.” On the latest report of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear programme, the officials said several drafts on the position to be adopted were in circulation and India was confident that a draft acceptable to all the sides would be worked out in a couple of days. “Obviously, no one would like the emergence of another nuclear state,” the officials said, suggesting that a difference had to be made on the nuclear programme for peaceful purposes and a project which had the potential to lead to development of a nuclear weapon. On the latest U.S.-Australia pact on positioning American marines in Australia, the Indian officials were cautious in their response. They said India would be in a position to articulate its views only when the finer details of the deal were known. “We have no idea how many troops would be stationed and what kind of troops are likely to be present on the Australian soil. We see it as a political message by Washington.” |