Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120725/jsp/nation/story_15769098.jsp#.UA-Rt6AXVwc&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16400,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120725/jsp/nation/story_15769098.jsp#.UA-Rt6AXVwc&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16400,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16272
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.<br /><br />The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.<br /><br />The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.<br /><br />Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.<br /><br />Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.<br /><br />The Centre&rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.<br /><br />A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.<br /><br />The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.<br /><br />It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.<br /><br />&ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.<br /><br />The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.<br /><br />The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120725/jsp/nation/story_15769098.jsp#.UA-Rt6AXVwc&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16400,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120725/jsp/nation/story_15769098.jsp#.UA-Rt6AXVwc&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16400,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16272
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.<br /><br />The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.<br /><br />The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.<br /><br />Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.<br /><br />Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.<br /><br />The Centre&rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.<br /><br />A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.<br /><br />The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.<br /><br />It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.<br /><br />&ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.<br /><br />The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.<br /><br />The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680222319cd6d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680222319cd6d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120725/jsp/nation/story_15769098.jsp#.UA-Rt6AXVwc&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16400,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16272,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 25 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120725/jsp/nation/story_15769098.jsp#.UA-Rt6AXVwc&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16400,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16272
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &amp;mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &amp;mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&amp;rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre&amp;rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&amp;rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&amp;rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.<br /><br />The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.<br /><br />The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.<br /><br />Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.<br /><br />Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.<br /><br />The Centre&rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.<br /><br />A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.<br /><br />The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.<br /><br />It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.<br /><br />&ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.<br /><br />The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.<br /><br />The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 16272,
		'title' => 'No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.<br />
<br />
The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.<br />
<br />
The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.<br />
<br />
The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.<br />
<br />
Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.<br />
<br />
Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.<br />
<br />
The Centre&rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.<br />
<br />
The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.<br />
<br />
A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.<br />
<br />
It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.<br />
<br />
The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.<br />
<br />
It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.<br />
<br />
After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.<br />
<br />
The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.<br />
<br />
The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120725/jsp/nation/story_15769098.jsp#.UA-Rt6AXVwc',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 16400,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 16272,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Governance',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.<br /><br />The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.<br /><br />The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.<br /><br />Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.<br /><br />Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.<br /><br />The Centre&rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.<br /><br />A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.<br /><br />The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.<br /><br />It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.<br /><br />&ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.<br /><br />The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.<br /><br />The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 16272,
	'title' => 'No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.<br />
<br />
The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.<br />
<br />
The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.<br />
<br />
The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.<br />
<br />
Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.<br />
<br />
Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.<br />
<br />
The Centre&rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.<br />
<br />
The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.<br />
<br />
A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.<br />
<br />
It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.<br />
<br />
The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.<br />
<br />
It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.<br />
<br />
After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.<br />
<br />
The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.<br />
<br />
The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120725/jsp/nation/story_15769098.jsp#.UA-Rt6AXVwc',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'no-strike-axe-on-parties-says-govt-samanwaya-rautray-16400',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 16400,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 16272
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Governance'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.

The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs &mdash; complete shutdowns, which are illegal &mdash; under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court&rsquo;s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not.<br /><br />The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act.<br /><br />The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party.<br /><br />Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party.<br /><br />Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc.<br /><br />The Centre&rsquo;s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property.<br /><br />The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions.<br /><br />A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it.<br /><br />The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways.<br /><br />It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic.<br /><br />After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss.<br /><br />&ldquo;Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,&rdquo; an affidavit filed by the state had claimed.<br /><br />The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government&rsquo;s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana.<br /><br />The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

No strike axe on parties, says govt-Samanwaya Rautray

-The Telegraph The Centre today told the Supreme Court that neither the courts nor the Election Commission can de-recognise political parties for calling bandhs that result in large-scale destruction of public property. The Centre quoted a 2002 judgment delivered after the Congress had moved Kerala High Court against the CPI for frequently calling bandhs — complete shutdowns, which are illegal — under the ruse of calling hartals, which are optional. According to the top court’s judgment, bandhs are illegal but hartals are not. The Congress had then claimed the CPI was indulging in unconstitutional activities by enforcing its hartals by force, coercion and intimidation and should be de-registered as a party by the Election Commission under the Representation of the People Act. The high court had upheld its claims but the Supreme Court shot it down. The top court had said that in the absence of an express provision in law giving the poll panel power to review its own decisions, it cannot de-register any party. Quoting from that judgment, solicitor-general R.F. Nariman said since the panel was carrying out quasi-judicial functions, it could not conduct any inquiry and take action against any party. Under the judgment, the panel can only take action in cases where a party has registered itself by fraud, changed its nomenclature and rules of association or declared that it does not follow the Constitution etc. The Centre’s stand came in response to a court notice seeking its opinion on whether parties could be de-registered for calling bandhs that cause large-scale destruction of public property. The court is dealing with PILs that have drawn its attention to the large-scale violence during the Gujjar agitation in Rajasthan and anti-lower caste violence in Haryana which resulted in a loss of Rs 33 crore to the railways by way of disruptions. A bench, comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and S.J. Mukhopadhyaya, had asked the state of Haryana and the Centre to explain whether, in the name of peaceful agitation by a political outfit or a group of persons, the state administration can allow (directly or indirectly) disruption of rail and road traffic. It had also sought to know whether, in the event of disruption of rail and road traffic, it was the responsibility of the state to bring before law the persons responsible for it. The court also sought to know in the event loss was suffered by the railways (direct or indirect) on account of disruption of movement of trains (passenger as well as goods), whether the state should be asked to reimburse the railways. It wanted to know what guidelines, if any, should be laid down by the court to ensure such incidents do not recur and public property is not damaged by people who indulge in illegal disruption of rail and road traffic. After hearing the solicitor-general, the court adjourned the case but not before pulling up Haryana for wishing away the Rs 33-crore loss to the railways as a notional loss. “Actual loss is only Rs 7 lakh, rest is notional by way of loss of freight traffic,” an affidavit filed by the state had claimed. The bench rejected the affidavit and expressed unhappiness with the Haryana government’s stand on compliance with the SC, ST Atrocities (Prevention) Act in view of the violence against lower castes in Haryana. The bench directed the principal secretary (home) to explain the state stand through an affidavit in seven days, both on reimbursing Rs 33 crore to the railways and compliance with the act.