Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25020, 'title' => 'No to unbundling FCI', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <p style="text-align: justify"> <em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em> </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 June, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/no-to-unbundling-fci-114060501419_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25020, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI', 'metaKeywords' => 'procurement,Food Corporation of India,FCI,Food Security,Agriculture,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25020, 'title' => 'No to unbundling FCI', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <p style="text-align: justify"> <em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em> </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 June, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/no-to-unbundling-fci-114060501419_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25020 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI' $metaKeywords = 'procurement,Food Corporation of India,FCI,Food Security,Agriculture,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No to unbundling FCI</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as "unbundling" of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25020, 'title' => 'No to unbundling FCI', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <p style="text-align: justify"> <em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em> </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 June, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/no-to-unbundling-fci-114060501419_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25020, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI', 'metaKeywords' => 'procurement,Food Corporation of India,FCI,Food Security,Agriculture,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25020, 'title' => 'No to unbundling FCI', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <p style="text-align: justify"> <em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em> </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 June, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/no-to-unbundling-fci-114060501419_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25020 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI' $metaKeywords = 'procurement,Food Corporation of India,FCI,Food Security,Agriculture,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No to unbundling FCI</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as "unbundling" of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801670d146d8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801670d146d8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25020, 'title' => 'No to unbundling FCI', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <p style="text-align: justify"> <em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em> </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 June, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/no-to-unbundling-fci-114060501419_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25020, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI', 'metaKeywords' => 'procurement,Food Corporation of India,FCI,Food Security,Agriculture,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25020, 'title' => 'No to unbundling FCI', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <p style="text-align: justify"> <em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em> </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 June, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/no-to-unbundling-fci-114060501419_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25020 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI' $metaKeywords = 'procurement,Food Corporation of India,FCI,Food Security,Agriculture,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard &nbsp; A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as &quot;unbundling&quot; of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>No to unbundling FCI</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as "unbundling" of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25020, 'title' => 'No to unbundling FCI', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <p style="text-align: justify"> <em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em> </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as "unbundling" of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 June, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/no-to-unbundling-fci-114060501419_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 25020, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI', 'metaKeywords' => 'procurement,Food Corporation of India,FCI,Food Security,Agriculture,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as "unbundling" of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 25020, 'title' => 'No to unbundling FCI', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Business Standard </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <p style="text-align: justify"> <em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em> </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as "unbundling" of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. </p> <p style="text-align: justify"> Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 5 June, 2014, http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/no-to-unbundling-fci-114060501419_1.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'no-to-unbundling-fci-4673052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4673052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 25020 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | No to unbundling FCI' $metaKeywords = 'procurement,Food Corporation of India,FCI,Food Security,Agriculture,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Business Standard</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><p style="text-align: justify"><em>A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food</em></p><p style="text-align: justify">Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one.</p><p style="text-align: justify">The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as "unbundling" of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states.</p><p style="text-align: justify">But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices.</p><p style="text-align: justify">Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
No to unbundling FCI |
-The Business Standard A totally novel method needed to procure and disburse food Unbundling the Food Corporation of India (FCI) by hiving it into three separate entities for procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrain seems prima facie an unsound proposition. It would lead to a multiplicity of food handling agencies; the proliferation of bureaucracy would cause procedural delays and poor coordination. Administrative expenses, which are already high and bloating the food subsidy bill, would tend to soar further after the FCI's reorganisation. Accountability, too, is likely to be difficult; each organisation will tend to pass the buck to the others if delivery is poor. Besides, there is no warranty that the new outfits would not carry their past baggage of deficiencies along, or that the new system as a whole would be more efficient than the existing one. The idea of revamping and restructuring the FCI was first suggested when the National Democratic Alliance was last in power, but was shelved for want of consensus. It was subsequently revived and repackaged as "unbundling" of the FCI in 2011, in the report of the committee of chief ministers on food inflation headed by Narendra Modi. It found no takers then, too. It went into Mr Modi's election manifesto and now is reportedly part of his programme as prime minister. Certainly, the need to revamp the malfunctioning public distribution system (PDS) and make it more efficient and leak-proof cannot be disregarded. Extension of its coverage to two-thirds of the population, as promised under the food security law, would entail the procurement of huge quantities of foodgrain - at least 62 million tonnes - as well as their safe upkeep and smooth delivery to beneficiaries across the country. This is a formidable task which the Centre may find hard to shoulder without substantial involvement of the states. But, even under the existing food management system, much of the procurement and distribution work is handled by state agencies. The Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) also exists, hiring out most of its godowns to the FCI. It is, therefore, possible to run the PDS with a far smaller food management body than the existing FCI, by outsourcing grain procurement entirely to the states and handing over storage work to the CWC. The states would be happy to do so as it results in the transfer of more Central resources to them. Some states, notably Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, are in fact already going all out to increase grain procurement and therefore revenue, even offering bonuses on top of the minimum support prices. Thus, instead of creating three new monolithic organisations in place of the white elephant that the FCI has become, it would be better to conceive a totally novel system to efficiently run the public distribution system. The twin objectives of providing remunerative prices to grain-growers and supplying staple foods to consumers at subsidised prices need not be sacrificed while doing so. |