Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11171, 'title' => 'Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 17 November, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/17010740/Nod-for-26-FDI-in-pension-fun.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11285, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11171, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'metaKeywords' => 'FDI', 'metaDesc' => ' The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11171, 'title' => 'Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 17 November, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/17010740/Nod-for-26-FDI-in-pension-fun.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11285, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11171 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair' $metaKeywords = 'FDI' $metaDesc = ' The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">“The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,” said Sinha, a former finance minister. “I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,” said a government official, who did not want to be named. “Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee’s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It’s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,” said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. “Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government’s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11171, 'title' => 'Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 17 November, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/17010740/Nod-for-26-FDI-in-pension-fun.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11285, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11171, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'metaKeywords' => 'FDI', 'metaDesc' => ' The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11171, 'title' => 'Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 17 November, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/17010740/Nod-for-26-FDI-in-pension-fun.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11285, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11171 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair' $metaKeywords = 'FDI' $metaDesc = ' The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">“The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,” said Sinha, a former finance minister. “I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,” said a government official, who did not want to be named. “Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee’s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It’s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,” said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. “Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government’s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ed7b0995a0f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11171, 'title' => 'Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 17 November, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/17010740/Nod-for-26-FDI-in-pension-fun.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11285, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11171, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'metaKeywords' => 'FDI', 'metaDesc' => ' The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11171, 'title' => 'Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 17 November, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/17010740/Nod-for-26-FDI-in-pension-fun.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11285, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11171 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair' $metaKeywords = 'FDI' $metaDesc = ' The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,&rdquo; said Sinha, a former finance minister. &ldquo;I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,&rdquo; said a government official, who did not want to be named. &ldquo;Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee&rsquo;s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees&rsquo; Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,&rdquo; said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. &ldquo;Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government&rsquo;s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">“The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,” said Sinha, a former finance minister. “I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,” said a government official, who did not want to be named. “Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee’s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It’s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,” said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. “Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government’s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11171, 'title' => 'Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,” said Sinha, a former finance minister. “I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,” said a government official, who did not want to be named. “Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also rejected the standing committee’s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “It’s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,” said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. “Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government’s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 17 November, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/17010740/Nod-for-26-FDI-in-pension-fun.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11285, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11171, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'metaKeywords' => 'FDI', 'metaDesc' => ' The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">“The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,” said Sinha, a former finance minister. “I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,” said a government official, who did not want to be named. “Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee’s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It’s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,” said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. “Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government’s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11171, 'title' => 'Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,” said Sinha, a former finance minister. “I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,” said a government official, who did not want to be named. “Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government has also rejected the standing committee’s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “It’s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,” said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. “Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government’s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 17 November, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/11/17010740/Nod-for-26-FDI-in-pension-fun.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nod-for-26-fdi-in-pension-funds-by-remya-nair-11285', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11285, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11171 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair' $metaKeywords = 'FDI' $metaDesc = ' The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult.</div><div style="text-align: justify">“The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,” said Sinha, a former finance minister. “I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,” said a government official, who did not want to be named. “Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government has also rejected the standing committee’s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“It’s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,” said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. “Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government’s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Nod for 26% FDI in pension funds by Remya Nair |
The govt has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% FDI cap be a part of the Bill The cabinet on Wednesday cleared amendments to the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, 2011, capping the overseas investment limit in the sector at 26%, but retaining the flexibility to raise this limit by stating that it would not form a part of the legislation. The government has thus rejected the recommendation of the parliamentary standing committee on finance that the 26% foreign direct investment (FDI) cap be a part of the Bill. The legislation is expected to be introduced in Parliament during the winter session. With the government not accepting most of the recommendations of the standing committee headed by opposition Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, its passage may be difficult. “The government is rejecting the consensus formed in the standing committee with a great deal of effort. Most of the members had agreed with the suggestions with the exception of Communist party members,” said Sinha, a former finance minister. “I will discuss with my party on what the next course of action will be. Our support cannot be taken for granted.” The government is of the view that policy decisions on foreign investments in pensions should be kept outside the purview of the legislation and be regulated under the Foreign Exchange Management Act. “FDI in pension will be capped on par with the insurance sector but the foreign investment ceiling for the pension sector need not be a part of the Bill,” said a government official, who did not want to be named. “Pension fund managers only perform fund management services, and do not solicit funds like insurance companies. Constant calibration of foreign investment may be required.” The government has also rejected the standing committee’s recommendation to provide minimum guaranteed returns to investors. The committee had recommended that the minimum rate of return should not be less than that given by the state-run Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme. The government is of the view that such a move would curb the maximizing of returns and defeat the basic purpose of moving away from defined benefits to defined contributions. “It’s a very good decision not to provide guaranteed returns. Even when you look at the performance of the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation, real returns have been negative for a number of years. In comparison, the National Pension System (NPS) has provided much higher return in its short span,” said Gautam Bhardwaj, director of Invest India Economic Foundation, a consultancy specializing in pension reforms. “Guarantees will force pension fund managers to invest in government securities instead of the equity markets, limiting the upside.” The Bill, which was introduced in March, proposes bringing PFRDA on par with other financial sector regulators by giving it a statutory status. It is the United Progressive Alliance government’s second attempt at putting in place a statutory framework for the sector. The previous Congress party-led government failed to push through a pension Bill in 2005 as the Communists, its allies at the time, refused to back the legislation. The Bill will empower PFRDA to regulate NPS and introduce regulations to reform it. |