Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 32844, 'title' => 'Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -PTI<br /> <br /> <em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /> <br /> New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /> <br /> The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /> <br /> Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /> <br /> The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /> <br /> The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /> <br /> The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 January, 2017, https://thewire.in/90974/90974/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4680923, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 32844, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'metaKeywords' => 'RBI,Reserve Bank of India,Accountability,transparency,RTI Act,Right to Information Act,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 32844, 'title' => 'Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -PTI<br /> <br /> <em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /> <br /> New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /> <br /> The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /> <br /> Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /> <br /> The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /> <br /> The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /> <br /> The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 January, 2017, https://thewire.in/90974/90974/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4680923, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 32844 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision' $metaKeywords = 'RBI,Reserve Bank of India,Accountability,transparency,RTI Act,Right to Information Act,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' -PTI More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.<br /><br />“Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.”<br /><br />“How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been ‘Should [their] views be taken?’, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister’s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />“The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 32844, 'title' => 'Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -PTI<br /> <br /> <em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /> <br /> New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /> <br /> The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /> <br /> Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /> <br /> The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /> <br /> The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /> <br /> The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 January, 2017, https://thewire.in/90974/90974/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4680923, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 32844, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'metaKeywords' => 'RBI,Reserve Bank of India,Accountability,transparency,RTI Act,Right to Information Act,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 32844, 'title' => 'Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -PTI<br /> <br /> <em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /> <br /> New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /> <br /> The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /> <br /> Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /> <br /> The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /> <br /> The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /> <br /> The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 January, 2017, https://thewire.in/90974/90974/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4680923, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 32844 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision' $metaKeywords = 'RBI,Reserve Bank of India,Accountability,transparency,RTI Act,Right to Information Act,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' -PTI More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.<br /><br />“Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.”<br /><br />“How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been ‘Should [their] views be taken?’, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister’s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />“The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f4d9a9805aa-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 32844, 'title' => 'Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -PTI<br /> <br /> <em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /> <br /> New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /> <br /> The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /> <br /> Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /> <br /> The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /> <br /> The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /> <br /> The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 January, 2017, https://thewire.in/90974/90974/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4680923, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 32844, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'metaKeywords' => 'RBI,Reserve Bank of India,Accountability,transparency,RTI Act,Right to Information Act,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 32844, 'title' => 'Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -PTI<br /> <br /> <em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /> <br /> New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /> <br /> The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /> <br /> Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /> <br /> The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /> <br /> The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /> <br /> The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 January, 2017, https://thewire.in/90974/90974/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4680923, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 32844 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites &#039;Threat to Life&#039; Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision' $metaKeywords = 'RBI,Reserve Bank of India,Accountability,transparency,RTI Act,Right to Information Act,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' -PTI More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the &lsquo;Reserved&rsquo; Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the &ldquo;views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under &ldquo;seeking opinion&rdquo; from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, &ldquo;No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been &lsquo;Should [their] views be taken?&rsquo;, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],&rdquo; former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers &ldquo;any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />&ldquo;The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,&rdquo; the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is &ldquo;hypothetical&rdquo; in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.<br /><br />“Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.”<br /><br />“How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been ‘Should [their] views be taken?’, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister’s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />“The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 32844, 'title' => 'Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -PTI<br /> <br /> <em>More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India<br /> <br /> New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /> <br /> The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.<br /> <br /> “Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /> <br /> Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.”<br /> <br /> “How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been ‘Should [their] views be taken?’, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /> <br /> The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.<br /> <br /> The query was also sent to the Prime Minister’s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /> <br /> The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /> <br /> “The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said.<br /> <br /> The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 January, 2017, https://thewire.in/90974/90974/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4680923, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 32844, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'metaKeywords' => 'RBI,Reserve Bank of India,Accountability,transparency,RTI Act,Right to Information Act,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.<br /><br />“Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.”<br /><br />“How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been ‘Should [their] views be taken?’, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister’s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />“The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 32844, 'title' => 'Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -PTI<br /> <br /> <em>More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India<br /> <br /> New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /> <br /> The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.<br /> <br /> “Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /> <br /> Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.”<br /> <br /> “How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been ‘Should [their] views be taken?’, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /> <br /> The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.<br /> <br /> The query was also sent to the Prime Minister’s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /> <br /> The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /> <br /> “The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said.<br /> <br /> The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 January, 2017, https://thewire.in/90974/90974/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-rbi-cites-039threat-to-life039-exemption-to-deny-rti-query-on-demonetisation-decision-4680923', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4680923, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 32844 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision' $metaKeywords = 'RBI,Reserve Bank of India,Accountability,transparency,RTI Act,Right to Information Act,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' -PTI More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8?...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br /><em>More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law.<br /><br />The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”.<br /><br />“Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query.<br /><br />Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.”<br /><br />“How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been ‘Should [their] views be taken?’, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer.<br /><br />The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”.<br /><br />The query was also sent to the Prime Minister’s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application.<br /><br />The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes.<br /><br />“The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said.<br /><br />The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/" title="https://thewire.in/90974/90974/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Now RBI Cites 'Threat to Life' Exemption to Deny RTI Query on Demonetisation Decision |
-PTI
More stonewalling from the ‘Reserved’ Bank of India New Delhi: Were the views of the chief economic advisor and the finance minister taken before the sudden announcement of demonetisation of high-value currency notes by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8? The Reserve Bank of India feels this query cannot be answered under the Right to Information Act as it does not come under the definition of information under the transparency law. The applicant wanted to know whether the “views of Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramaniam and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley were taken before announcement was made”. “Query is in the nature of seeking opinion from CPIO which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act,” the RBI said in response to an RTI query. Asked whether the information sought will fall under “seeking opinion” from the CPIO, former chief information commissioner A.N. Tiwari said, “No. It does not. It is a fact sought by an RTI applicant. The CPIO cannot say an opinion has been sought from him.” “How it can be called seeking opinion? Whether someone was consulted or not is a matter of record. Had the question been ‘Should [their] views be taken?’, then it would mean [seeking an] opinion [from the CPIO],” former information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said, expressing surprise at the response of theRBI central public information officer. The definition of information covers “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”. The query was also sent to the Prime Minister’s office and the finance ministry but it remained unanswered even after 30 days of filing of the RTI application. The applicant had also sought to know the designation and the names of officials who were consulted before the scrapping of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes. “The information sought relates to sensitive matters pertaining to discontinuation/withdrawal of bank notes. The information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) and (g) of RTI Act,” the RBI said. The monetary policy regulator also did not disclose if the decision to demonetise currency notes was opposed by any official or minister, saying the information sought is “hypothetical” in nature. Please click here to read more. |