Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13277, 'title' => 'Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name/articleshow/12037930.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13277, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp; It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13277, 'title' => 'Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name/articleshow/12037930.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13277 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Gender' $metaDesc = ' Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp; It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that "a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name". The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a "progressive new addition to the law for women". Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. "A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been," said a lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname," said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. "But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring," said a Mumbai family law lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants". "There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along," said Agnes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal & Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names After Marriage </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13277, 'title' => 'Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name/articleshow/12037930.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13277, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp; It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13277, 'title' => 'Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name/articleshow/12037930.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13277 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Gender' $metaDesc = ' Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp; It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that "a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name". The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a "progressive new addition to the law for women". Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. "A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been," said a lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname," said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. "But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring," said a Mumbai family law lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants". "There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along," said Agnes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal & Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names After Marriage </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ebb102cec2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13277, 'title' => 'Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name/articleshow/12037930.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13277, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp; It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13277, 'title' => 'Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name/articleshow/12037930.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13277 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Gender' $metaDesc = ' Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp; It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that &quot;a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name&quot;. The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a &quot;progressive new addition to the law for women&quot;. Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. &quot;A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been,&quot; said a lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname,&quot; said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. &quot;But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring,&quot; said a Mumbai family law lawyer.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants&quot;. &quot;There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along,&quot; said Agnes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal &amp; Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names&nbsp;After Marriage&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that "a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name". The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a "progressive new addition to the law for women". Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. "A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been," said a lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname," said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. "But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring," said a Mumbai family law lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants". "There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along," said Agnes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal & Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names After Marriage </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13277, 'title' => 'Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The radical rule says that "a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name". The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a "progressive new addition to the law for women". Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. "A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been," said a lawyer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname," said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. "But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring," said a Mumbai family law lawyer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants". "There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along," said Agnes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal & Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The Law On Names After Marriage </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>After Divorce </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name/articleshow/12037930.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13277, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that "a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name". The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a "progressive new addition to the law for women". Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. "A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been," said a lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname," said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. "But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring," said a Mumbai family law lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants". "There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along," said Agnes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal & Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names After Marriage </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex </div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13277, 'title' => 'Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The radical rule says that "a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name". The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a "progressive new addition to the law for women". Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. "A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been," said a lawyer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname," said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. "But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring," said a Mumbai family law lawyer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants". "There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along," said Agnes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal & Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The Law On Names After Marriage </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>After Divorce </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name/articleshow/12037930.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'now-women-can-retain-their-maiden-name-by-swati-deshpande-13399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13277 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Gender' $metaDesc = ' Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The radical rule says that "a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name". The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a "progressive new addition to the law for women". Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. "A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been," said a lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname," said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. "But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring," said a Mumbai family law lawyer. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants". "There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along," said Agnes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal & Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The Law On Names After Marriage </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>After Divorce </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">* A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex </div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Now, women can retain their maiden name by Swati Deshpande |
Women in Maharashtra have another reason to celebrate as International Women's Day approaches. It is now perfectly legal for a woman to retain her maiden name after marriage. The Bombay high court recently amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act to prevent a woman from being compelled to file any marriage-related proceedings only in her husband's surname, thus offering relief to many seeking a divorce. It will also help a married woman file proceedings in other courts under her maiden name, say legal experts. The radical rule says that "a wife who has not changed her name after marriage, by publishing in the official gazette, may continue to use her maiden name". The law is clear now: a woman is not obliged to take her husband's name after marriage. A woman can file proceedings either in her maiden name or another name she may have adopted as long as it is officially registered in the gazette. If she retains her maiden name, a woman cannot be forced by a court to write her name as her first name followed by her husband's first name and his surname while making a marriage-related petition. Flavia Agnes of the women's rights activist group Majlis, whose efforts led to this change, sees the amendment as a "progressive new addition to the law for women". Majlis' efforts ensured that a woman can continue to use her maiden name and surname if she so desires after marriage for all official purposes. She is not bound to use her husband's name and can initiate proceedings in any court using her maiden name. The 'after divorce' status, meanwhile, does not force a woman to revert to her maiden surname if she had been using her husband's surname all through the marriage. She can continue with the ex-husband's surname, unless her intention is to defraud him, as was held by the Supreme Court. Unknown to even lawyers, the new law stands published in the state gazette since last November, after the Bombay high court amended a crucial rule under the Family Courts Act in September 2011. The law has been hailed by women's rights activists and lawyers. "A woman cannot be compelled while seeking divorce to adopt her married surname if she hadn't been using it, just as she cannot be compelled to drop her married name and revert to maiden surname after divorce, if she had been," said a lawyer. "Prior to the amendment, the Bandra family court staff would not accept divorce or related applications from hundreds of women until they added the first name of their estranged husband as their middle name, and also his surname," said Agnes. The court staff would compel the quarrelling couple to bear only one surname-the husband's-in the court case to be filed. A year ago, Majlis took up the cause with the Bombay high court because it supervises functioning of all lower courts. The issue, said Majlis, was that in Maharashtra, many communities practised the custom of a new wife changing even her first name after marriage and adopting her husband's full name. But other communities from states across India do not usually follow this custom, though it's common for women to adopt the husband's surname. Besides, an increasing number of urban women prefer to retain and go by their complete maiden name after marriage to preserve their individual identity. "But when they approach the family court to initiate a divorce dispute or a plea for protection from domestic violence few years later or after decades of living with their maiden name, the insistence by court staff to adopt their husband's name comes as a shock and sends their litigation-induced stress levels soaring," said a Mumbai family law lawyer. Majlis activists said the arbitrary practice causes immense harassment to women litigants". "There is no logic in making women adopt the husband's name while seeking divorce when they hadn't used it all along," said Agnes. The NGO informed the HC that the rigid and pervading practice of enabling a woman to file for divorce only after incorporating her husband's names was evident in appeals filed before higher courts too. The HC swung into action and its Registrar (legal & Research) informed Majlis on February 10, 2012 that it had amended the rule last September to facilitate greater freedom for women under the Family Court rules of 1988. It amended and added a proviso to Rule 5, which deals with the filing of cases in the family court. The Law On Names After Marriage * A wife may continue to use her maiden name if she has not changed it officially after marriage * A wife can file for divorce in her maiden surname; married surname; any other name she may have adopted and officially gazetted After Divorce * A woman can continue using her former married surname, except if her intention is to defraud the ex
|