Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681799421c1df-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681799421c1df-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681799421c1df-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6270, 'title' => 'NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /> <br /> The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /> <br /> The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /> <br /> Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /> <br /> How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /> <br /> Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /> <br /> Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /> <br /> States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /> <br /> Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /> <br /> This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /> <br /> Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /> <br /> Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /> <br /> This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /> <br /> In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /> <br /> And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 1 March, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/03/01/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6364, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 6270, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6270, 'title' => 'NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /> <br /> The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /> <br /> The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /> <br /> Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /> <br /> How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /> <br /> Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /> <br /> Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /> <br /> States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /> <br /> Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /> <br /> This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /> <br /> Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /> <br /> Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /> <br /> This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /> <br /> In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /> <br /> And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 1 March, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/03/01/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6364, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 6270 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100...' $disp = '<div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India’s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there’s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India’s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers’ Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India’s poorest people and should be expanded. “We’re all going to be very critical of this,” he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year’s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681799421c1df-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681799421c1df-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681799421c1df-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6270, 'title' => 'NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /> <br /> The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /> <br /> The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /> <br /> Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /> <br /> How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /> <br /> Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /> <br /> Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /> <br /> States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /> <br /> Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /> <br /> This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /> <br /> Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /> <br /> Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /> <br /> This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /> <br /> In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /> <br /> And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 1 March, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/03/01/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6364, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 6270, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6270, 'title' => 'NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /> <br /> The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /> <br /> The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /> <br /> Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /> <br /> How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /> <br /> Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /> <br /> Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /> <br /> States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /> <br /> Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /> <br /> This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /> <br /> Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /> <br /> Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /> <br /> This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /> <br /> In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /> <br /> And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 1 March, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/03/01/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6364, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 6270 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100...' $disp = '<div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India’s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there’s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India’s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers’ Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India’s poorest people and should be expanded. “We’re all going to be very critical of this,” he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year’s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681799421c1df-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681799421c1df-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681799421c1df-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681799421c1df-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6270, 'title' => 'NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /> <br /> The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /> <br /> The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /> <br /> Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /> <br /> How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /> <br /> Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /> <br /> Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /> <br /> States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /> <br /> Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /> <br /> This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /> <br /> Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /> <br /> Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /> <br /> This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /> <br /> In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /> <br /> And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 1 March, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/03/01/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6364, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 6270, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6270, 'title' => 'NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /> <br /> The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /> <br /> The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /> <br /> Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /> <br /> How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /> <br /> Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /> <br /> Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /> <br /> States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /> <br /> Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /> <br /> This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /> <br /> Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /> <br /> Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /> <br /> This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /> <br /> In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /> <br /> And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 1 March, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/03/01/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6364, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 6270 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100...' $disp = '<div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country&rsquo;s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India&rsquo;s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there&rsquo;s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India&rsquo;s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers&rsquo; Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India&rsquo;s poorest people and should be expanded. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re all going to be very critical of this,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year&rsquo;s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India’s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there’s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India’s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers’ Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India’s poorest people and should be expanded. “We’re all going to be very critical of this,” he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year’s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6270, 'title' => 'NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /> <br /> The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /> <br /> The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /> <br /> Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /> <br /> How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /> <br /> Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /> <br /> Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India’s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there’s no need to budget more now.<br /> <br /> States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /> <br /> Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India’s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /> <br /> This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /> <br /> Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers’ Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /> <br /> Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India’s poorest people and should be expanded. “We’re all going to be very critical of this,” he said.<br /> <br /> Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /> <br /> This year’s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /> <br /> In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /> <br /> And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 1 March, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/03/01/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6364, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 6270, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India’s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there’s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India’s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers’ Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India’s poorest people and should be expanded. “We’re all going to be very critical of this,” he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year’s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 6270, 'title' => 'NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /> <br /> The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /> <br /> The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /> <br /> Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /> <br /> How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /> <br /> Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /> <br /> Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India’s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there’s no need to budget more now.<br /> <br /> States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /> <br /> Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India’s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /> <br /> This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /> <br /> Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers’ Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /> <br /> Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India’s poorest people and should be expanded. “We’re all going to be very critical of this,” he said.<br /> <br /> Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /> <br /> This year’s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /> <br /> In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /> <br /> And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 1 March, 2011, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/03/01/nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'nrega-budget-disappoints-on-the-downside-by-tom-wright-6364', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 6364, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 6270 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities. The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100...' $disp = '<div align="justify">One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.<br /><br />The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads.<br /><br />The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda.<br /><br />Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program.<br /><br />How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period?<br /><br />Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion).<br /><br />Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India’s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there’s no need to budget more now.<br /><br />States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new.<br /><br />Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India’s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs.<br /><br />This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector.<br /><br />Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers’ Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program.<br /><br />Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India’s poorest people and should be expanded. “We’re all going to be very critical of this,” he said.<br /><br />Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market.<br /><br />This year’s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation.<br /><br />In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary.<br /><br />And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
NREGA Budget Disappoints on the Downside by Tom Wright |
One of the big surprises in the 2011-2012 budget was that spending on the country’s landmark rural employment program remained flat, disappointing activists who see it as a way of redressing growing wealth disparities.
The program has since 2006 guaranteed 100 days of work a year for unskilled laborers to build rural infrastructure like irrigation ditches and roads. The Congress party has made the program, known as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the centerpiece of its pro-poor economic agenda. Initially, the program paid 100 rupees ($2.2) a day. But the government agreed in January to tag wages to inflation, pushing daily rates up by between 17% and 30%. Those rises also balloon the costs for the central government, which pays 100% of salaries under the program. How then did the government announce Monday that it would spend 400 billion rupees ($8.8 billion), or about on the program next fiscal year, unchanged from the current period? Many people, including social activists who helped design the program, had expected a 50% increase to a budget of around 600 billion rupees ($13.2 billion). Sushma Nath, the top bureaucrat at India’s Finance Ministry, explained on Monday that states are sitting on $3.8 billion that they have yet to spend, so there’s no need to budget more now. States have faced bureaucratic snafus in disbursing so much money. But overall, the program has been hugely popular, and delays in spending budgeted funds are nothing new. Perhaps more tellingly, Ms. Nath said the program was intended to offer last-ditch employment to India’s poorest citizens, not attract workers away from higher-paying manufacturing jobs. This appears to be a nod to critics who say the employment program is throwing too much state money into rural infrastructure projects of dubious value, while steering workers away from the private sector. Nikhil Dey, a co-founder of the Laborer and Farmers’ Strength Association, a nonprofit which advised the government on the program, said the lower-than-expected budget was a worrisome sign that the government might not be willing to fully fund an expanded program. Mr. Dey says the program has pushed up wages for India’s poorest people and should be expanded. “We’re all going to be very critical of this,” he said. Another, less-charitable, analysis could be that the government Monday was simply trying to keep the ballooning cost of the program off its books for now to allow it to show fiscal belt-tightening to a watchful stock market. This year’s total budget shows just a 3.4% rise in spending from last year. But as the revised numbers for the present period, which will end March 31, showed, spending for the full year can rise enormously from what the government estimates during the budget presentation. In a sign of this, Ms. Nath said the government could allocate more money to the program during the coming fiscal year if there is demand from workers. Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu also told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that the government is mandated under law to increase funding for NREGA during the year as necessary. And with salaries now linked to rising prices, one of the few inflation-indexed jobs in the country, many analysts expect that demand to keep coming. |