Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9734, 'title' => 'Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /> <br /> Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /> <br /> Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /> <br /> The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /> <br /> Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 31 August, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/08/30215645/Only-15-of-28-states-have-name.html?atype=tp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9843, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 9734, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />&ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />&ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />&ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9734, 'title' => 'Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /> <br /> Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /> <br /> Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /> <br /> The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /> <br /> Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 31 August, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/08/30215645/Only-15-of-28-states-have-name.html?atype=tp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9843, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 9734 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />&ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />&ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />&ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation’s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven’t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />“The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),” said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. “There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.”<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />“For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,” said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. “Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.”<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />“Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,” Rai said. “Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.”<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA’s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9734, 'title' => 'Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /> <br /> Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /> <br /> Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /> <br /> The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /> <br /> Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 31 August, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/08/30215645/Only-15-of-28-states-have-name.html?atype=tp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9843, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 9734, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />&ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />&ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />&ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9734, 'title' => 'Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /> <br /> Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /> <br /> Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /> <br /> The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /> <br /> Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 31 August, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/08/30215645/Only-15-of-28-states-have-name.html?atype=tp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9843, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 9734 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />&ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />&ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />&ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation’s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven’t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />“The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),” said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. “There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.”<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />“For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,” said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. “Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.”<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />“Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,” Rai said. “Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.”<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA’s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68051146e6b8b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9734, 'title' => 'Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /> <br /> Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /> <br /> Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /> <br /> The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /> <br /> Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 31 August, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/08/30215645/Only-15-of-28-states-have-name.html?atype=tp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9843, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 9734, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />&ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />&ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />&ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9734, 'title' => 'Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /> <br /> Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /> <br /> Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /> <br /> The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /> <br /> Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 31 August, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/08/30215645/Only-15-of-28-states-have-name.html?atype=tp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9843, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 9734 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government&rsquo;s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation&rsquo;s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven&rsquo;t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />&ldquo;The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),&rdquo; said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. &ldquo;There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.&rdquo;<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />&ldquo;For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,&rdquo; said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. &ldquo;Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.&rdquo;<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />&ldquo;Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,&rdquo; Rai said. &ldquo;Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.&rdquo;<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA&rsquo;s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation’s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven’t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />“The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),” said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. “There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.”<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />“For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,” said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. “Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.”<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />“Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,” Rai said. “Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.”<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA’s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9734, 'title' => 'Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /> <br /> Only 15 of the nation’s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven’t appointed the watchdog.<br /> <br /> Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /> <br /> “The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),” said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. “There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.”<br /> <br /> After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /> <br /> The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /> <br /> “For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,” said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. “Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.”<br /> <br /> Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /> <br /> “Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,” Rai said. “Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.”<br /> <br /> MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /> <br /> Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA’s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 31 August, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/08/30215645/Only-15-of-28-states-have-name.html?atype=tp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9843, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 9734, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation’s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven’t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />“The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),” said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. “There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.”<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />“For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,” said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. “Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.”<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />“Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,” Rai said. “Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.”<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA’s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9734, 'title' => 'Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /> <br /> Only 15 of the nation’s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven’t appointed the watchdog.<br /> <br /> Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /> <br /> “The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),” said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. “There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.”<br /> <br /> After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /> <br /> The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /> <br /> “For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,” said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. “Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.”<br /> <br /> Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /> <br /> “Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,” Rai said. “Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.”<br /> <br /> MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /> <br /> Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA’s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 31 August, 2011, http://www.livemint.com/2011/08/30215645/Only-15-of-28-states-have-name.html?atype=tp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'only-15-of-28-states-have-named-rural-jobs-scheme-ombudsman-by-ruhi-tewari-9843', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9843, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 9734 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.<br /><br />Only 15 of the nation’s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven’t appointed the watchdog.<br /><br />Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009.<br /><br />“The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),” said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. “There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.”<br /><br />After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances.<br /><br />The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size.<br /><br />“For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,” said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. “Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.”<br /><br />Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication.<br /><br />“Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,” Rai said. “Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.”<br /><br />MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March.<br /><br />Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA’s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Only 15 of 28 states have named rural jobs scheme ombudsman by Ruhi Tewari |
Bihar and Uttar Pradesh are among the Indian states that have failed to name an ombudsman to handle grievances and prevent graft related to the central government’s flagship rural jobs programme, even two years after they were directed to do so.
Only 15 of the nation’s 28 states have appointed the ombudsmen, according to the ministry of rural development. Assam, Haryana, Kerala and Tamil Nadu also haven’t appointed the watchdog. Setting up an independent authority to redress complaints related to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was part of the 100-day agenda of the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance government, when it was voted to power for a second term in May 2009. “The government is not interested in addressing corruption and grievance redressal issues at any level, a major trigger of the anti-corruption agitation (led by Anna Hazare),” said Manoj Rai, director at the New Delhi-based Society for Participatory Research in Asia. “There are so many problems with the functioning of the scheme and an effective ombudsman in all states would have helped to rectify these problems.” After facing allegations of corruption, the rural development ministry that oversees the job programme with the largest budget among government welfare schemes, had directed all state governments in September 2009 to establish an independent ombudsman within three months to address grievances. The deadline had to be extended after states cited fund shortages, assembly and local government elections, unavailability of officials and confusion over guidelines as reasons for delays in implementation. The directive was based on the recommendations of an expert group on redressal of grievances constituted in 2008. Punjab, Sikkim, Manipur, Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Nagaland and West Bengal are the 15 states where ombudsmen have been appointed either for every district or one for a group of districts, depending on their size. “For the other states, the process is still on. It is a multi-tiered process which takes time, hence the delay,” said a ministry official familiar with the process who did not want to be identified. “Another reason for the delay is that there are very few applicants for the post since the remuneration is very low.” Some states such as Kerala contend that since they already have ombudsman at local government level, a separate authority for MGNREGA would amount to duplication. “Most states are just not interested in creating such a body. In some states, especially Uttar Pradesh, problems of decentralization, inefficient and incapable bureaucracy as well as lack of political will are hindering the process,” Rai said. “Another problem is that the specification of this scheme is implementation by panchayati raj institutions, but these institutions are in bad shape in a lot of states.” MGNREGA, which was introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of work every year to each rural household. It has provided employment to 15.9 million households so far this fiscal and has a budget allocation of `40,000 crore for the year to 31 March. Minister for rural development Jairam Ramesh recently said that he was in the process of drafting a public services grievances redressal Bill that would address corruption and grievance redressal at the lowest echelons of the government. The proposed law will draw on the experience of MGNREGA’s institutionalized mechanism, Ramesh said. |