Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 30 September, 2014, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674103,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGA,NREGS,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 30 September, 2014, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674103,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26065
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGA,NREGS,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify">The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.</p><p align="justify">The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).</p><p align="justify">Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government's focus on correcting the problem.</p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, this year's figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme's implementation.</p><p align="justify">The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.</p><p align="justify">The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 30 September, 2014, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674103,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGA,NREGS,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 30 September, 2014, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674103,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26065
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGA,NREGS,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify">The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.</p><p align="justify">The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).</p><p align="justify">Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government's focus on correcting the problem.</p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, this year's figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme's implementation.</p><p align="justify">The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.</p><p align="justify">The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6810f6a0b0b98-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 30 September, 2014, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674103,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGA,NREGS,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26065,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 30 September, 2014, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674103,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26065
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGA,NREGS,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &amp;quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&amp;quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government&#039;s focus on correcting the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, this year&#039;s figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme&#039;s implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify">The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.</p><p align="justify">The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).</p><p align="justify">Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government's focus on correcting the problem.</p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, this year's figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme's implementation.</p><p align="justify">The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.</p><p align="justify">The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 26065,
		'title' => 'Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).
</p>
<p align="justify">
Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government's focus on correcting the problem.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Meanwhile, this year's figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme's implementation.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 30 September, 2014, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4674103,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 26065,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari',
	'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGA,NREGS,Employment',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify">The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.</p><p align="justify">The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).</p><p align="justify">Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government's focus on correcting the problem.</p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, this year's figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme's implementation.</p><p align="justify">The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.</p><p align="justify">The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 26065,
	'title' => 'Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express
</div>
<p align="justify">
The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).
</p>
<p align="justify">
Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government's focus on correcting the problem.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Meanwhile, this year's figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme's implementation.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 30 September, 2014, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'only-31-days-of-work-per-household-provided-under-rural-job-scheme-this-year-ruhi-tewari-4674103',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4674103,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 26065
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari'
$metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,MGNREGS,NREGA,NREGS,Employment'
$metaDesc = '
-The Indian Express


The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify">The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year.</p><p align="justify">The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September).</p><p align="justify">Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. &quot;There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment,&quot; an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government's focus on correcting the problem.</p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, this year's figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme's implementation.</p><p align="justify">The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year.</p><p align="justify">The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Only 31 days of work per household provided under rural job scheme this year -Ruhi Tewari

-The Indian Express The government at the Centre may have changed, but the performance of the flagship rural job guarantee scheme continues to remain dismal, with households not getting work for even one third of the mandated 100 days (annually) on an average so far this year. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), introduced in February 2006, promises 100 days of employment every year to each rural household. A half-yearly review of the scheme, as per data available with the Rural Development Ministry, shows the average number of days of employment provided per household as only 31 this year so far (April-September). Officials say figures are expected to improve by year-end but admit that it is unlikely to cross the 50-day mark. Officials say such poor statistics are due to both demand and supply problem. Given the scheme is demand driven, a decline in these figures would mean a decline in demand. However, they say there is more of a supply constraint with inadequate planning at local-level and implementation gaps like delays in wage payments, combined with fund crunch. "There has been a huge fund crunch this year with states not having received funds on time. Moreover, most states have huge backlog of payments and once they receive funds, they first clear that instead of generating fresh employment," an official said. In fact, the delays in wage payment this year have been among the worst, despite the new government's focus on correcting the problem. Meanwhile, this year's figures with respect to the average days of employment provided to each household are a continuation of the declining trend in the scheme's implementation. The Indian Express had earlier reported the average days of employment provided per household has been less than 50 since the scheme was instituted, except in 2009-10 which was a drought year. The budget for the scheme has seen a massive increase from around Rs 11,000 crore in 2006-07 to Rs 40,000 crore in 2009-10. The current budgetary allocation for the scheme is Rs 33,000 crore.