Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681198f15b466-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681198f15b466-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681198f15b466-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 6 January, 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega/420832/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5313,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&amp;quot;We...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 6 January, 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega/420832/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5313,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5221
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&amp;quot;We...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&quot;We..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.<br /><br />&quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.<br /><br />It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).<br /><br />The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.<br /><br />The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.<br /><br />Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&rdquo;.<br /><br />She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.<br /><br />The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.<br /><br />The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.<br /><br />The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681198f15b466-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681198f15b466-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681198f15b466-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 6 January, 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega/420832/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5313,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&amp;quot;We...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 6 January, 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega/420832/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5313,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5221
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&amp;quot;We...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&quot;We..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.<br /><br />&quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.<br /><br />It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).<br /><br />The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.<br /><br />The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.<br /><br />Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&rdquo;.<br /><br />She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.<br /><br />The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.<br /><br />The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.<br /><br />The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681198f15b466-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681198f15b466-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681198f15b466-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681198f15b466-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 6 January, 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega/420832/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5313,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&amp;quot;We...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5221,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Standard, 6 January, 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega/420832/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5313,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5221
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&amp;quot;We...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&amp;rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &amp;ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&amp;ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&quot;We..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.<br /><br />&quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.<br /><br />It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).<br /><br />The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.<br /><br />The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.<br /><br />Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&rdquo;.<br /><br />She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.<br /><br />The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.<br /><br />The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.<br /><br />The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 5221,
		'title' => 'Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.<br />
<br />
&quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.<br />
<br />
It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).<br />
<br />
The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.<br />
<br />
The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.<br />
<br />
Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.<br />
<br />
The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.<br />
<br />
The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.<br />
<br />
The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.<br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 6 January, 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega/420832/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 5313,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 5221,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA',
	'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS',
	'metaDesc' => '
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&quot;We...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.<br /><br />&quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.<br /><br />It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).<br /><br />The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.<br /><br />The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.<br /><br />Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&rdquo;.<br /><br />She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.<br /><br />The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.<br /><br />The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.<br /><br />The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.<br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 5221,
	'title' => 'Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.<br />
<br />
&quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.<br />
<br />
It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).<br />
<br />
The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.<br />
<br />
The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.<br />
<br />
Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.<br />
<br />
The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.<br />
<br />
The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.<br />
<br />
The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.<br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 6 January, 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega/420832/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'orissa-files-500-page-response-in-supreme-court-over-mgnrega-5313',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 5313,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 5221
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA'
$metaKeywords = 'NREGS'
$metaDesc = '
The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.

&quot;We...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state.<br /><br />&quot;We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter&rdquo;, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons.<br /><br />It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).<br /><br />The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks.<br /><br />The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not.<br /><br />Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, &ldquo;We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this&rdquo;.<br /><br />She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.&ldquo;It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA.<br /><br />The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa.<br /><br />The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme.<br /><br />The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.<br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Orissa files 500-page response in Supreme Court over MGNREGA

The Orissa government today filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the stricture made by the apex court on the alleged irregularities committed in the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in the state. "We have filed a 500-page response in the Supreme Court on the status of the implementation of MGNREGA in the state. Action has been taken against around 600 errant officials in connection with the implementation of this scheme. In our response, we have also stated that the CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in the scheme is not needed as the Vigilance is already probing into the matter”, Chief Secretary B K Pattnaik told media persons. It may be noted that on December 16, the Supreme Court had issued a showcause notice to the Orissa government asking as to why a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should not be ordered into the alleged diversion of funds for the Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). The bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia had directed the Chief Secretary of Orissa and additional secretary of the Union ministry of rural development to file a compliance report on the implementation of guidelines within three weeks. The apex court had also asked them to file their response in the same affidavit about the CBI probe. The bench asked the Centre and the Orissa government to inform the extent of fund released to Orissa between 2006 and 2010. It wanted to know whether utilisation certificate for the fund was given by the Orissa government to the Centre or not. Further, the bench asked them to inform how many people were employed under the scheme in Orissa and whether social auditing was done by the Gram Sabha or not. Additional Solicitor General, Indira Jaising said, “We want a CBI probe. We are facing resistance from the state governments. The states are supposed to convert guidelines into rules but they are not doing this”. She informed the court that in Orissa, 11 lakh bogus cards under MGNREGA were cancelled. The court had granted six weeks to Orissa government to explain, as to why the operational guidelines of MGNREGA framed in 2008 by the Centre under Section 27 of the Act should not be made mandatory.“It is purely a question of law that the state should be ready on the next occasion to answer,” the bench said. The apex court had favoured a Central probe into the diversion of funds and non?implementation of rural employment scheme MGNREGA in Orissa. It had said that the allegations were of serious nature as Rs 40,000 crore is being released by the Centre annually to state governments for implementation of MGNREGA. The bench also wanted to know from the Centre what steps it intends to take on the allegations concerning Orissa. The court was hearing a PIL filed in 2007 by an NGO- Centre for Environment and Food Security alleging large scale corruption in the MGNREGA scheme. The court wanted a nodal agency to monitor the programme in the wake of allegations in the petition that the benefits of the scheme were not percolating down to the targeted.