Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 22 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/22/stories/2011042250650100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7334,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 22 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/22/stories/2011042250650100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7334,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7237
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify"><em>UPA wants JPC to do the job<br /><br />BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government<br /><br />Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage<br /></em><br />After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.<br /><br />Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.<br /><br />On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.<br /><br />While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.<br /><br />The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.<br /><br />Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 22 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/22/stories/2011042250650100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7334,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 22 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/22/stories/2011042250650100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7334,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7237
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify"><em>UPA wants JPC to do the job<br /><br />BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government<br /><br />Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage<br /></em><br />After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.<br /><br />Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.<br /><br />On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.<br /><br />While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.<br /><br />The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.<br /><br />Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68031a867dfdb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 22 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/22/stories/2011042250650100.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7334,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7237,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 22 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/22/stories/2011042250650100.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7334,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7237
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPA wants JPC to do the job&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify"><em>UPA wants JPC to do the job<br /><br />BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government<br /><br />Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage<br /></em><br />After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.<br /><br />Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.<br /><br />On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.<br /><br />While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.<br /><br />The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.<br /><br />Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 7237,
		'title' => 'PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>UPA wants JPC to do the job<br />
<br />
BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government<br />
<br />
Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage<br />
</em><br />
After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.<br />
<br />
Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.<br />
<br />
On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.<br />
<br />
While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.<br />
<br />
The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.<br />
<br />
Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/22/stories/2011042250650100.htm',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 7334,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 7237,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption',
	'metaDesc' => '
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify"><em>UPA wants JPC to do the job<br /><br />BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government<br /><br />Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage<br /></em><br />After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.<br /><br />Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.<br /><br />On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.<br /><br />While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.<br /><br />The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.<br /><br />Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 7237,
	'title' => 'PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>UPA wants JPC to do the job<br />
<br />
BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government<br />
<br />
Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage<br />
</em><br />
After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.<br />
<br />
Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.<br />
<br />
On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.<br />
<br />
While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.<br />
<br />
The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.<br />
<br />
Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 22 April, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/04/22/stories/2011042250650100.htm',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'pac-divided-on-2g-report-by-neena-vyas-7334',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 7334,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 7237
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas'
$metaKeywords = 'Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
UPA wants JPC to do the job

BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government

Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage

After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained...'
$disp = '<div align="justify"><em>UPA wants JPC to do the job<br /><br />BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government<br /><br />Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage<br /></em><br />After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject.<br /><br />Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient.<br /><br />On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant.<br /><br />While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts.<br /><br />The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC.<br /><br />Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

PAC divided on 2G report by Neena Vyas

UPA wants JPC to do the job BJP feels it has a better chance of indicting the government Congress men realise that a JPC report will be more to their advantage After a three-hour-long discussion here on Thursday, the Public Accounts Committee remained a divided house on the question whether it should finalise its findings in a report on the 2G spectrum allocation or leave the entire issue to the Joint Parliamentary Committee set up specifically to probe this very subject. Rules of procedure were cited, parliamentary procedures were mentioned and instances of past precedents were brought up to buttress claims on both the sides. Ironically, PAC members from the ruling coalition parties, including the Congress and the DMK, were reportedly in favour of the PAC dropping the matter altogether to let the JPC proceed unhindered although for an entire winter session of Parliament these parties had strongly opposed the setting up of the JPC, citing the PAC inquiry into the 2G matter as sufficient. On the Opposition side too, although the BJP had firmly stated that the PAC was not the proper committee to look at all relevant issues that have cropped up and wanted the probe by a JPC, now party members on the PAC were keen on an early PAC report that would virtually make the JPC redundant. While those against the PAC continuing with its 2G spectrum inquiry point out that there were no PAC inquiries into Bofors, and the Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parikh scams which were all looked at by JPCs to reinforce their argument against a dual inquiry, those on the other side point out duplication was inevitable as the PAC was already probing the matter for months before the JPC was set up. They also point out simultaneous inquiries by the Central Bureau of Investigation and other agencies. An inquiry by one more agency would not matter. But members of the ruling coalition continued to say some matters were sub judice and it would be wrong for a parliamentary report on a subject under criminal investigation and that is already under scrutiny of the courts. The fact that the PAC is currently chaired by BJP veteran Murli Manohar Joshi and the JPC by senior Congress leader P.C. Chacko explains the sparring between members of these parties who are on the PAC. Suddenly, it seems to have dawned on the BJP that it has a better chance of strongly indicting the government through a report by the PAC headed by Mr. Joshi although it had vigorously demanded a JPC, while Congress men realise that a report from the JPC would be more to their advantage especially as it is empowered to look at telecom policy issues going back to the time of the National Democratic Alliance government.