Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21756, 'title' => 'Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. </p> <p align="justify"> Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. </p> <p align="justify"> Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. </p> <p align="justify"> But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. </p> <p align="justify"> A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. </p> <p align="justify"> Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. </p> <p align="justify"> He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict/article4905807.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'metaKeywords' => 'Supreme Court,crime,Politics,transparency', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot;</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot;</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21756, 'title' => 'Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. </p> <p align="justify"> Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. </p> <p align="justify"> Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. </p> <p align="justify"> But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. </p> <p align="justify"> A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. </p> <p align="justify"> Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. </p> <p align="justify"> He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict/article4905807.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha' $metaKeywords = 'Supreme Court,crime,Politics,transparency' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot;</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot;</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, "Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment."</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at ‘reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, "Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls."</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. "This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?"</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was ‘out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">"This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?" He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a ‘considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised ‘very serious practical and political questions.' "In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear."</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. "These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail."</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, "This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?"</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21756, 'title' => 'Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. </p> <p align="justify"> Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. </p> <p align="justify"> Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. </p> <p align="justify"> But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. </p> <p align="justify"> A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. </p> <p align="justify"> Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. </p> <p align="justify"> He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict/article4905807.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'metaKeywords' => 'Supreme Court,crime,Politics,transparency', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot;</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot;</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21756, 'title' => 'Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. </p> <p align="justify"> Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. </p> <p align="justify"> Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. </p> <p align="justify"> But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. </p> <p align="justify"> A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. </p> <p align="justify"> Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. </p> <p align="justify"> He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict/article4905807.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha' $metaKeywords = 'Supreme Court,crime,Politics,transparency' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot;</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot;</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, "Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment."</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at ‘reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, "Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls."</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. "This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?"</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was ‘out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">"This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?" He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a ‘considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised ‘very serious practical and political questions.' "In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear."</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. "These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail."</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, "This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?"</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec5673f2ee0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21756, 'title' => 'Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. </p> <p align="justify"> Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. </p> <p align="justify"> Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. </p> <p align="justify"> But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. </p> <p align="justify"> A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. </p> <p align="justify"> Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. </p> <p align="justify"> He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict/article4905807.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'metaKeywords' => 'Supreme Court,crime,Politics,transparency', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot;</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot;</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot;</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21756, 'title' => 'Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. </p> <p align="justify"> Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. </p> <p align="justify"> Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. </p> <p align="justify"> But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. </p> <p align="justify"> A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. </p> <p align="justify"> Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. </p> <p align="justify"> He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot; </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict/article4905807.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha' $metaKeywords = 'Supreme Court,crime,Politics,transparency' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are &lsquo;deeply concerned' and even &lsquo;outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had &lsquo;cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, &quot;Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment.&quot;</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at &lsquo;reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, &quot;Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. &quot;This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?&quot;</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was &lsquo;out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?&quot; He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a &lsquo;considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised &lsquo;very serious practical and political questions.' &quot;In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear.&quot;</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. &quot;These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, &quot;This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?&quot;</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, "Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment."</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at ‘reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, "Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls."</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. "This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?"</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was ‘out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">"This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?" He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a ‘considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised ‘very serious practical and political questions.' "In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear."</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. "These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail."</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, "This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?"</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21756, 'title' => 'Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. </p> <p align="justify"> Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. </p> <p align="justify"> Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, "Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment." </p> <p align="justify"> BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at ‘reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. </p> <p align="justify"> But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. </p> <p align="justify"> A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, "Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls." </p> <p align="justify"> He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. "This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?" </p> <p align="justify"> In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was ‘out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. </p> <p align="justify"> "This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?" He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a ‘considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. </p> <p align="justify"> Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised ‘very serious practical and political questions.' "In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear." </p> <p align="justify"> He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. "These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail." </p> <p align="justify"> Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. </p> <p align="justify"> He said, "This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?" </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict/article4905807.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21756, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'metaKeywords' => 'Supreme Court,crime,Politics,transparency', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, "Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment."</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at ‘reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, "Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls."</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. "This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?"</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was ‘out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">"This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?" He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a ‘considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised ‘very serious practical and political questions.' "In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear."</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. "These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail."</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, "This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?"</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21756, 'title' => 'Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. </p> <p align="justify"> Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. </p> <p align="justify"> Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, "Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment." </p> <p align="justify"> BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at ‘reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. </p> <p align="justify"> But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. </p> <p align="justify"> A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, "Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls." </p> <p align="justify"> He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. "This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?" </p> <p align="justify"> In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was ‘out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. </p> <p align="justify"> "This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?" He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a ‘considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. </p> <p align="justify"> Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised ‘very serious practical and political questions.' "In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear." </p> <p align="justify"> He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. "These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail." </p> <p align="justify"> Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. </p> <p align="justify"> He said, "This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?" </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict/article4905807.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'parties-deeply-concerned-at-supreme-court-verdict-prashant-jha-21904', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21904, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21756 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha' $metaKeywords = 'Supreme Court,crime,Politics,transparency' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections. Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br />Political parties are ‘deeply concerned' and even ‘outraged' at the Supreme Court verdict that any person in custody - whether convicted or not - could not contest elections.</p><p align="justify">Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class.</p><p align="justify">Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, "Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment."</p><p align="justify">BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at ‘reform', they needed more time to formulate a position.</p><p align="justify">But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern.</p><p align="justify">A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, "Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls."</p><p align="justify">He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. "This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?"</p><p align="justify">In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was ‘out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class.</p><p align="justify">"This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?" He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a ‘considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view.</p><p align="justify">Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised ‘very serious practical and political questions.' "In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear."</p><p align="justify">He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. "These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail."</p><p align="justify">Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions.</p><p align="justify">He said, "This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?"</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Parties ‘deeply concerned’ at Supreme Court verdict-Prashant Jha |
-The Hindu
Even as they had apprehensions, politicians had ‘cautiously welcomed' the verdict, which disqualified convicted lawmakers from holding office or contesting polls. But the judgment barring those imprisoned from fighting polls has opened up prospects of a confrontation between the judiciary and the political class. Both major parties, the Congress and the BJP officially refrained from making a comment. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit said, "Till we see the full judgment, we cannot comment." BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said while they welcomed any effort at ‘reform', they needed more time to formulate a position. But privately, political sources contacted by The Hindu expressed concern. A Congress member in the Lok Sabha said, "Imagine a situation when a political rival, days before the nomination for an election, files drummed up and false charges against me on any pretext, say for outraging a woman's modesty. I will be picked up, and then cannot contest polls." He gave other instances to show the implications of the verdict. "This is a country where thousands of Muslims are in prison, without conviction, where even Anna Hazare was in custody. How will it work?" In his initial response, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat told The Hindu that the verdict was ‘out of order, and liable to misuse on a large-scale.' He raised concerns, which appear to be shared by the wider political class. "This would mean that a person in custody, even if charges are not framed, cannot contest elections. Then there are others who may be on bail. What happens to them?" He, however, added that the CPI(M) would take a ‘considered view' on both the judgments before offering a formal and detailed view. Communist Party of India MP D Raja said the verdict raised ‘very serious practical and political questions.' "In a multiparty system, political parties have their prejudices. A government can, out of political vendetta, file charges against a rival. The logic of the verdict is not clear." He added that politicians participate in protests and agitations, and might be put in custody. "These are controversial issues and need to be examined in more detail." Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Jha had similar apprehensions. He said, "This calls for wider consultations. In a fragmented and unequal socio-political matrix, it is easiest to file charges against those fighting for the marginalised, poor and vulnerable. Politicians can be accused of sedition, for waging war against the state, if they question the establishment and put into prison. Should they be de-barred then?" |