Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 12 April, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4681595,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 12 April, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4681595,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 33501
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Plea for army leeway in Manipur</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.<br /><br />Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &quot;open court&quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government's review petition.<br /><br />In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &quot;excessive and retaliatory force&quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.<br /><br />&quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army's ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.<br /><br />A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges' chambers.<br /><br />Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &quot;carefully&quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.<br /><br />While rejecting the Centre's contention that a &quot;war-like situation&quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.<br /><br />The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &quot;disturbed&quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &quot;internal disturbances&quot;.<br /><br />A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.<br /><br />In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&quot;<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 12 April, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4681595,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 12 April, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4681595,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 33501
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Plea for army leeway in Manipur</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.<br /><br />Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &quot;open court&quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government's review petition.<br /><br />In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &quot;excessive and retaliatory force&quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.<br /><br />&quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army's ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.<br /><br />A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges' chambers.<br /><br />Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &quot;carefully&quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.<br /><br />While rejecting the Centre's contention that a &quot;war-like situation&quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.<br /><br />The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &quot;disturbed&quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &quot;internal disturbances&quot;.<br /><br />A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.<br /><br />In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&quot;<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eff46fa4266-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 12 April, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4681595,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 33501,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 12 April, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4681595,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 33501
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &amp;quot;open court&amp;quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government&#039;s review petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &amp;quot;excessive and retaliatory force&amp;quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army&#039;s ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&amp;quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges&#039; chambers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &amp;quot;carefully&amp;quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While rejecting the Centre&#039;s contention that a &amp;quot;war-like situation&amp;quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &amp;quot;disturbed&amp;quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &amp;quot;internal disturbances&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &amp;quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Plea for army leeway in Manipur</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.<br /><br />Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &quot;open court&quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government's review petition.<br /><br />In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &quot;excessive and retaliatory force&quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.<br /><br />&quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army's ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.<br /><br />A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges' chambers.<br /><br />Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &quot;carefully&quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.<br /><br />While rejecting the Centre's contention that a &quot;war-like situation&quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.<br /><br />The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &quot;disturbed&quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &quot;internal disturbances&quot;.<br /><br />A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.<br /><br />In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&quot;<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 33501,
		'title' => 'Plea for army leeway in Manipur',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.<br />
<br />
Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &quot;open court&quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government's review petition.<br />
<br />
In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &quot;excessive and retaliatory force&quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.<br />
<br />
&quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army's ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.<br />
<br />
A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges' chambers.<br />
<br />
Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &quot;carefully&quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.<br />
<br />
While rejecting the Centre's contention that a &quot;war-like situation&quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.<br />
<br />
The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &quot;disturbed&quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &quot;internal disturbances&quot;.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.<br />
<br />
In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&quot;<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA">click here</a> to read more. <br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 12 April, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4681595,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 33501,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.<br /><br />Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &quot;open court&quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government's review petition.<br /><br />In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &quot;excessive and retaliatory force&quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.<br /><br />&quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army's ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.<br /><br />A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges' chambers.<br /><br />Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &quot;carefully&quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.<br /><br />While rejecting the Centre's contention that a &quot;war-like situation&quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.<br /><br />The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &quot;disturbed&quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &quot;internal disturbances&quot;.<br /><br />A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.<br /><br />In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&quot;<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 33501,
	'title' => 'Plea for army leeway in Manipur',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.<br />
<br />
Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &quot;open court&quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government's review petition.<br />
<br />
In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &quot;excessive and retaliatory force&quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.<br />
<br />
&quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army's ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.<br />
<br />
A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges' chambers.<br />
<br />
Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &quot;carefully&quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.<br />
<br />
While rejecting the Centre's contention that a &quot;war-like situation&quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.<br />
<br />
The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &quot;disturbed&quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &quot;internal disturbances&quot;.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.<br />
<br />
In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&quot;<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA">click here</a> to read more. <br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 12 April, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'plea-for-army-leeway-in-manipur-4681595',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4681595,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 33501
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea for army leeway in Manipur'
$metaKeywords = 'Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA),AFSPA'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Attorney-general Mukul...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.<br /><br />Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an &quot;open court&quot; hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government's review petition.<br /><br />In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use &quot;excessive and retaliatory force&quot; in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings.<br /><br />&quot;The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army's ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country,&quot; the Centre said in its latest curative petition.<br /><br />A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges' chambers.<br /><br />Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea &quot;carefully&quot; before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing.<br /><br />While rejecting the Centre's contention that a &quot;war-like situation&quot; was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA.<br /><br />The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a &quot;disturbed&quot; area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing &quot;internal disturbances&quot;.<br /><br />A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012.<br /><br />In its recall plea today, the Centre said: &quot;The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security.&quot;<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170413/jsp/nation/story_146115.jsp#.WO7AhLideyA">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Plea for army leeway in Manipur

-The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre today approached the Supreme Court seeking recall of two orders directing a probe into all cases of alleged excessive use of force under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act during counter-insurgency operations in Manipur. Attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi urged a bench headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar for urgent listing of an "open court" hearing of the curative petition challenging the July 8, 2016, judgment of the apex court and its subsequent order on October 6, 2016, dismissing the government's review petition. In those two orders, the apex court had ruled that despite the AFSPA, which grants special immunity to the armed forces, the army cannot use "excessive and retaliatory force" in Manipur. The court had directed that all allegations of excessive force in the state be probed. However, the court is yet to pass an order on which agency should investigate the alleged extra-judicial killings. "The immediate effect of the impugned judgment is that it has hampered the Indian army's ability to respond to insurgent and terrorist situations attributable to actors within the boundaries of the country," the Centre said in its latest curative petition. A curative petition is the last resort for a petitioner for redress of a grievance and has only a 0.1 per cent success rate in the country. Such petitions are held within the closed doors of judges' chambers. Chief Justice Khehar, who was sitting along with Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, told the attorney-general that he would consider the plea "carefully" before taking a decision. No date has been fixed for the hearing. While rejecting the Centre's contention that a "war-like situation" was prevailing in Manipur, the Supreme Court had earlier ruled that the army did not have blanket immunity to use excessive retaliatory force against suspected enemies of the country under the controversial AFSPA. The court had held that even if a person is seen carrying a weapon in a "disturbed" area, it does not grant the security forces the right to shoot him, although it accepted that Manipur was facing "internal disturbances". A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur and U.U. Lalit had passed the ruling while dealing with a petition alleging 1,528 extra-judicial killings by the army and Manipur police in the past decade in the insurgency-affected state. The petition had been filed by the Extra Judicial Killings Victims Families Association and two others in 2012. In its recall plea today, the Centre said: "The findings and conclusions set out in the impugned order have far-reaching ramifications on the security and integrity of the territory of India, especially in parts of India that are plagued by constant militant and insurgency activities. If the position maintained by the impugned order continues, it may, one day, be well-nigh impossible to maintain peace and security." Please click here to read more.