Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11657, 'title' => 'Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111205/jsp/frontpage/story_14840225.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11775, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11657, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. If the apex court...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11657, 'title' => 'Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111205/jsp/frontpage/story_14840225.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11775, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11657 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. If the apex court...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”. If the apex court..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state’s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The “unconstitutional” tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government’s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was “not interested” in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court’s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state’s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government’s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court “was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were “injured or killed while attacking the police”. An inquiry must be done first into “what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen”, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was “intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court’s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11657, 'title' => 'Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111205/jsp/frontpage/story_14840225.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11775, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11657, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. If the apex court...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11657, 'title' => 'Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111205/jsp/frontpage/story_14840225.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11775, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11657 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. If the apex court...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”. If the apex court..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state’s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The “unconstitutional” tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government’s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was “not interested” in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court’s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state’s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government’s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court “was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were “injured or killed while attacking the police”. An inquiry must be done first into “what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen”, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was “intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court’s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045c3a98ce8-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11657, 'title' => 'Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111205/jsp/frontpage/story_14840225.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11775, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11657, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. If the apex court...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11657, 'title' => 'Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111205/jsp/frontpage/story_14840225.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11775, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11657 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;. If the apex court...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court&rsquo;s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor&rsquo;s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; and &ldquo;wholly unjustified&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state&rsquo;s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government&rsquo;s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was &ldquo;not interested&rdquo; in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court&rsquo;s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state&rsquo;s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government&rsquo;s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court &ldquo;was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were &ldquo;injured or killed while attacking the police&rdquo;. An inquiry must be done first into &ldquo;what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen&rdquo;, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was &ldquo;intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court&rsquo;s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”. If the apex court..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state’s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The “unconstitutional” tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government’s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was “not interested” in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court’s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state’s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government’s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court “was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were “injured or killed while attacking the police”. An inquiry must be done first into “what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen”, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was “intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court’s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11657, 'title' => 'Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the apex court allows the state’s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The “unconstitutional” tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata government’s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was “not interested” in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The high court’s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the top court accepts the state’s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government’s appeal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court “was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were “injured or killed while attacking the police”. An inquiry must be done first into “what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen”, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Left government had argued the rule was “intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court’s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111205/jsp/frontpage/story_14840225.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11775, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11657, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”. If the apex court...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state’s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The “unconstitutional” tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government’s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was “not interested” in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court’s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state’s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government’s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court “was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were “injured or killed while attacking the police”. An inquiry must be done first into “what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen”, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was “intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court’s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11657, 'title' => 'Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the apex court allows the state’s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The “unconstitutional” tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Mamata government’s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was “not interested” in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The high court’s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If the top court accepts the state’s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government’s appeal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court “was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were “injured or killed while attacking the police”. An inquiry must be done first into “what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen”, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Left government had argued the rule was “intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court’s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 5 December, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1111205/jsp/frontpage/story_14840225.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'plea-to-end-nandi-case-by-samanwaya-rautray-11775', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11775, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11657 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”. If the apex court...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the apex court allows the state’s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The “unconstitutional” tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Mamata government’s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was “not interested” in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court’s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">If the top court accepts the state’s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government’s appeal.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court “was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were “injured or killed while attacking the police”. An inquiry must be done first into “what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen”, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Left government had argued the rule was “intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court’s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Plea to end Nandi case by Samanwaya Rautray |
The Mamata Banerjee government has sought the Supreme Court’s permission to withdraw its Left predecessor’s appeal against a Calcutta High Court order that had described the March 2007 police firing in Nandigram as “unconstitutional” and “wholly unjustified”. If the apex court allows the state’s latest plea, it will pave the way for cases being filed against any erring policeman, officer or government official. The “unconstitutional” tag too will stand, as will the high court decision to strike down a Bengal police rule that asks the force to shoot directly at crowds instead of first firing warning shots in the air. The Mamata government’s petition, filed through state counsel Abhijit Sengupta, said it was “not interested” in proceeding with the special leave petitions filed by the former Left Front government. “Therefore, it is prayed that this court may be pleased to permit the (petitions) to be withdrawn in the interest of justice.” The withdrawal plea is yet to be listed for hearing. On March 14, 2007, police had fired on land protesters in Nandigram, causing 14 deaths and setting off a political earthquake that ended 34 years of Left rule in Bengal. The high court’s November 16, 2007, order had asked the CBI to probe the firing and prosecute policemen and officials who may have transgressed the law, and the state to compensate all the victims. The CBI is believed to have completed the probe. If the top court accepts the state’s plea, it may also lift its stay on the CBI filing cases, an order it had passed on December 13, 2007, following the Left government’s appeal. That appeal, filed on December 4 that year, had said the high court “was wholly unjustified in rendering strong and definite findings of unconstitutionality and illegality in the firing which the police were forced to undertake”. It had contested the direction to pay compensation to all the victims, saying some of them were “injured or killed while attacking the police”. An inquiry must be done first into “what part the injured/deceased had to play in attacking and injuring policemen”, it said. Eventually, the Left government compensated the victims after being prodded by the apex court. The former government had also challenged the high court move to strike down 155(B) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943, which forbids police from firing at anyone except members of a crowd. Under the rule, the police cannot fire in the air or in any other direction. The Left government had argued the rule was “intended to prevent innocent persons far behind the mob from being killed”. CPM state secretary Biman Bose had openly criticised the high court’s order, prompting it to issue contempt notices. The matter is still pending. |