Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17544, 'title' => '‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Note never revealed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Chacko defends PM</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore/article4010177.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17672, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17544, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Corruption,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17544, 'title' => '‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Note never revealed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Chacko defends PM</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore/article4010177.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17672, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17544 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh' $metaKeywords = '2G,Corruption,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister’s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar’s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta’s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta’s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar’s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM’s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh’s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar’s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions — where legally possible — or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh’s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place — that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja’s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country’s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>‘PM failed in his duty’</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,” Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, “The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman’s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: “The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. “The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time — when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry — that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications … It wasn’t the PM’s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price … He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn’t be revised,” he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko’s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko’s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month. </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17544, 'title' => '‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Note never revealed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Chacko defends PM</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore/article4010177.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17672, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17544, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Corruption,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17544, 'title' => '‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Note never revealed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Chacko defends PM</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore/article4010177.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17672, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17544 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh' $metaKeywords = '2G,Corruption,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister’s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar’s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta’s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta’s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar’s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM’s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh’s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar’s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions — where legally possible — or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh’s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place — that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja’s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country’s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>‘PM failed in his duty’</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,” Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, “The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman’s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: “The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. “The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time — when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry — that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications … It wasn’t the PM’s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price … He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn’t be revised,” he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko’s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko’s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month. </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681450d63afe2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681450d63afe2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17544, 'title' => '‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Note never revealed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Chacko defends PM</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore/article4010177.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17672, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17544, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Corruption,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17544, 'title' => '‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Note never revealed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Chacko defends PM</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore/article4010177.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17672, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17544 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh' $metaKeywords = '2G,Corruption,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister&rsquo;s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta&rsquo;s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta&rsquo;s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM&rsquo;s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh&rsquo;s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar&rsquo;s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions &mdash; where legally possible &mdash; or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh&rsquo;s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place &mdash; that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja&rsquo;s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country&rsquo;s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>&lsquo;PM failed in his duty&rsquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,&rdquo; Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, &ldquo;The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman&rsquo;s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: &ldquo;The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. &ldquo;The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time &mdash; when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry &mdash; that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications &hellip; It wasn&rsquo;t the PM&rsquo;s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price &hellip; He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn&rsquo;t be revised,&rdquo; he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko&rsquo;s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister’s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar’s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta’s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta’s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar’s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM’s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh’s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar’s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions — where legally possible — or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh’s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place — that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja’s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country’s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>‘PM failed in his duty’</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,” Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, “The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman’s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: “The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. “The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time — when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry — that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications … It wasn’t the PM’s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price … He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn’t be revised,” he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko’s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko’s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month. </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17544, 'title' => '‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister’s doorstep. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Chandrashekhar’s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta’s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta’s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar’s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>PM’s silence</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh’s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar’s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions — where legally possible — or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh’s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Note never revealed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place — that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja’s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country’s seniormost bureaucrat. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>‘PM failed in his duty’</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,” Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, “The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman’s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: “The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Chacko defends PM</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. “The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time — when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry — that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications … It wasn’t the PM’s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price … He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn’t be revised,” he told a TV channel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko’s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko’s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore/article4010177.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17672, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17544, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Corruption,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister’s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar’s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta’s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta’s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar’s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM’s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh’s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar’s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions — where legally possible — or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh’s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place — that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja’s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country’s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>‘PM failed in his duty’</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,” Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, “The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman’s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: “The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. “The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time — when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry — that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications … It wasn’t the PM’s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price … He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn’t be revised,” he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko’s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko’s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month. </div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17544, 'title' => '‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindu </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister’s doorstep. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Mr. Chandrashekhar’s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta’s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta’s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar’s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>PM’s silence</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh’s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar’s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions — where legally possible — or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh’s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Note never revealed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place — that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja’s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country’s seniormost bureaucrat. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>‘PM failed in his duty’</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,” Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, “The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman’s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: “The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Chacko defends PM</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. “The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time — when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry — that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications … It wasn’t the PM’s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price … He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn’t be revised,” he told a TV channel. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko’s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko’s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 18 October, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore/article4010177.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pm-ignored-my-note-to-hike-2g-entry-fee-to-rs-36000-crore-shalini-singh-17672', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17672, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17544 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh' $metaKeywords = '2G,Corruption,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindu</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister’s doorstep.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mr. Chandrashekhar’s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta’s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta’s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>5 weeks before 2G scam</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar’s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>PM’s silence</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh’s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar’s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions — where legally possible — or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh’s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Note never revealed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place — that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja’s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country’s seniormost bureaucrat.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>‘PM failed in his duty’</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,” Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, “The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman’s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: “The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Chacko defends PM</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. “The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time — when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry — that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications … It wasn’t the PM’s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price … He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn’t be revised,” he told a TV channel.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko’s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko’s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month. </div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
‘PM ignored my note to hike 2G entry fee to Rs. 36,000 crore’ -Shalini Singh |
-The Hindu Former Cabinet Secretary Chandrashekhar deposes before JPC The former Cabinet Secretary, K.M. Chandrashekhar’s shocking revelation on Thursday to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) investigating the 2G scam that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had ignored his recommendation that an entry fee of Rs. 36,000 crore be charged for spectrum, has brought the ghost of the 2G scam back to the Prime Minister’s doorstep. Mr. Chandrashekhar’s disclosure that he had submitted a note recommending a huge upward revision in the existing price of Rs. 1,651 crore for pan-India spectrum that had been discovered at 2001 rates, was in response to CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta’s persistent questioning about the failure of the Cabinet Secretariat to act on a matter which had such huge financial implications for the country. Mr. Dasgupta’s relentless and well-researched questioning of witnesses has yielded unexpected dividends. 5 weeks before 2G scam According to Mr. Chandrashekhar, the note was submitted on December 4, 2007. More importantly, it was not written suo motu, but submitted in response to a specific enquiry made by the Prime Minister regarding the financial implications of the allocation of scarce 2G spectrum at the 2001 price. Mr. Chandrashekhar explained that his recommendation for a staggering increase in spectrum price was based among other things, on the size of the market, the improvement in teledensity and the fact that demand had exceeded supply which was reflected through a long queue of 575 applicants for the licence. However, Dr. Singh never responded to his note. The timing of this note reveals that had the Prime Minister acted upon Mr. Chandrashekhar’s advice, the government could have easily prevented the scam, since this note was dated 5 weeks before the scam took place on January 10, 2008. PM’s silence Dr. Singh’s silence on the matter is particularly inexplicable considering that Mr. Chandrashekhar’s note was consistent with his own letter of November 2, 2007 to ex-Telecom Minister A. Raja, seeking either auctions — where legally possible — or an increase in the entry fee. Mr. Raja had replied to Dr. Singh’s letter on the same day, refusing to either auction the spectrum or enhance the entry fee. Subsequently, the then Finance Secretary Dr. Subbarao wrote to the Department of Telecom on November 22, 2007, again questioning the allocation of spectrum at 2001 rates, and directing a stay on all future allocation. The then DoT Secretary D.S. Mathur replied to this letter on November 29, 2007 arguing against any such action. The timing of the letter is particularly significant since it was written after all correspondence between the Prime Minister and Mr. Raja and between the Finance and DoT Secretaries had been exhausted. Note never revealed JPC members point out that it is very worrisome that this note has been kept under wraps by everyone concerned, including the CBI, which recently provided a detailed deposition to the same JPC without so much as a whisper about such a document. Such concealment cannot be justified after so many developments have taken place — that it is now nearly four-and-half years after the scam broke out; that FIRs have been registered against several companies and officers of the government, including a former Union Minister; that multiple cases have been filed in a High Court and a PIL in the Supreme Court; that the Supreme Court has issued an order cancelling 122 licences on February 2, 2012; and then came over 100 statements, press releases, TV interviews, depositions in the JPC and even statements in Parliament. Dr. Singh himself held a full press conference on the 2G scam on February 16, 2011, followed by a statement in Parliament on February 24, 2011. The Prime Minister explained that he did not object to Mr. Raja’s insistence on spectrum allocation at a 2001 price because of the agreement between the Ministries of Finance and Telecom as per the Cabinet decision of 2003, but did not reveal the existence of this critical note from the country’s seniormost bureaucrat. ‘PM failed in his duty’ “This is concrete proof that the PM failed in his duty to raise the entry fee for spectrum by ignoring market conditions as well as a clamour for price revision by several members of Parliament, industrialists, media and top bureaucrats,” Mr. Dasgupta told The Hindu. According to BJP leader and JPC member Yashwant Sinha, “The fact that the government is using concealment of critical information and misuse of the JPC Chairman’s office to scuttle the 2G probe is a very serious matter.” Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley told The Hindu: “The PMO must respond to charges of deliberate concealment of critical evidence since concealment is construed to be a part of criminal intent.” Chacko defends PM However, JPC Chairman and Congress MP P.C. Chacko, rather than briefing the media on the JPC proceedings, mounted a detailed defence of the Prime Minister. “The Cabinet Secretary had reported at that point of time — when various aspects were being considered by the PMO, DoT and the Finance Ministry — that if 2001 prices are revised then what will be the implications … It wasn’t the PM’s responsibility to revise the entry fee or spectrum price … He has to refer it to concerned Minister. [The] Telecom Minister has to go through the TRAI recommendation which had clearly said that prices needn’t be revised,” he told a TV channel. All six BJP members of the JPC and Mr. Dasgupta have already walked out of the JPC to protest Mr. Chacko’s attempts to sabotage any meaningful investigation by steadfastly refusing to entertain demands to call Finance Minister P. Chidambaram and Dr. Singh as witnesses. Mr. Chacko’s attempt to now publicly protect the Prime Minister is bound to deepen this divide, which is expected to reflect in Parliament next month.
|