Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 36272, 'title' => 'PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /> <br /> While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /> <br /> Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /> <br /> A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /> <br /> In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /> <br /> This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 14 April, 2018, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4684380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 36272, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'metaKeywords' => 'ordinance,Violence against SCs,Violence against STs,Crime against Dalits,Crime against SCs,Crime against STs,Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 36272, 'title' => 'PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /> <br /> While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /> <br /> Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /> <br /> A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /> <br /> In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /> <br /> This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 14 April, 2018, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4684380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 36272 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi' $metaKeywords = 'ordinance,Violence against SCs,Violence against STs,Crime against Dalits,Crime against SCs,Crime against STs,Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister’s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that “holidays and bureaucratic process” were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 36272, 'title' => 'PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /> <br /> While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /> <br /> Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /> <br /> A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /> <br /> In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /> <br /> This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 14 April, 2018, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4684380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 36272, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'metaKeywords' => 'ordinance,Violence against SCs,Violence against STs,Crime against Dalits,Crime against SCs,Crime against STs,Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 36272, 'title' => 'PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /> <br /> While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /> <br /> Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /> <br /> A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /> <br /> In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /> <br /> This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 14 April, 2018, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4684380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 36272 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi' $metaKeywords = 'ordinance,Violence against SCs,Violence against STs,Crime against Dalits,Crime against SCs,Crime against STs,Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister’s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that “holidays and bureaucratic process” were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6a89002ce0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 36272, 'title' => 'PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /> <br /> While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /> <br /> Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /> <br /> A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /> <br /> In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /> <br /> This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 14 April, 2018, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4684380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 36272, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'metaKeywords' => 'ordinance,Violence against SCs,Violence against STs,Crime against Dalits,Crime against SCs,Crime against STs,Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 36272, 'title' => 'PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /> <br /> While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /> <br /> Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /> <br /> A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /> <br /> In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /> <br /> This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 14 April, 2018, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4684380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 36272 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi' $metaKeywords = 'ordinance,Violence against SCs,Violence against STs,Crime against Dalits,Crime against SCs,Crime against STs,Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that &ldquo;holidays and bureaucratic process&rdquo; were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister’s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that “holidays and bureaucratic process” were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 36272, 'title' => 'PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /> <br /> While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister’s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /> <br /> Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /> <br /> A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /> <br /> In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /> <br /> This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that “holidays and bureaucratic process” were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 14 April, 2018, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4684380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 36272, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'metaKeywords' => 'ordinance,Violence against SCs,Violence against STs,Crime against Dalits,Crime against SCs,Crime against STs,Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister’s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that “holidays and bureaucratic process” were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 36272, 'title' => 'PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /> <br /> While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister’s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /> <br /> Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /> <br /> A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /> <br /> In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /> <br /> This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that “holidays and bureaucratic process” were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 14 April, 2018, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-scst-rakesh-mohan-chaturvedi-4684380', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4684380, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 36272 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi' $metaKeywords = 'ordinance,Violence against SCs,Violence against STs,Crime against Dalits,Crime against SCs,Crime against STs,Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit.<br /><br />While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister’s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed.<br /><br />Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard.<br /><br />A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community.<br /><br />In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government.<br /><br />This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that “holidays and bureaucratic process” were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. <br /><br />Please <a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms" title="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pmo-for-ordinance-to-counter-court-ruling-on-sc/st/articleshow/63755944.cms">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
PMO for ordinance to counter court ruling on SC/ST -Rakesh Mohan Chaturvedi |
-The Economic Times
NEW DELHI: After a successful Bharat Bandh against the Supreme Court judgement on the SC/ST Act, the government is worried about losing the perception battle to rival political parties on being pro-Dalit. While the suggestion for issuing an Ordinance-if needed to counter an adverse SC verdict on the review petitioncame from the Prime Minister’s Office, some cabinet ministers are of the view that issues like reservation in promotion and quota in private sector jobs also be discussed. Sources said some senior cabinet ministers have strongly expressed their ire over the weak presentation of the government view by the Additional Solicitor General in the apex court on March 20 when the SC/ST Act case was heard. A few cabinet ministers in the Narendra Modi government raised the issue of filing a review petition a week after the SC judgement and informed the PM that not doing so will antagonise the Dalit community. In a dinner meeting with the Prime Minister on March 28, Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan and Social Justice Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot raked up the issue. The Prime Minister had assured them then that it is already in the works. However, the fact that the review petition was filed only after 12 days (6 working days) on April 2 has angered the Dalit MPs and union ministers in the BJP government. This delay was also broached by some BJP lawmakers who were told that “holidays and bureaucratic process” were responsible for it. Many find it hard to believe that the review petition-which deals with the restoration of the SC/ST Act to its original form- required much work. Please click here to read more. |