Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27018, 'title' => 'PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. </p> <p align="justify"> Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. </p> <p align="justify"> On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. </p> <p align="justify"> Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. </p> <p align="justify"> Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter. </p> <p align="justify"> In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. </p> <p align="justify"> Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. </p> <p align="justify"> The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 14 January, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150115/jsp/nation/story_8521.jsp#.VLdnTnvxyBG', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675063, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27018, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gram Sabha,forest resources,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Rights,Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27018, 'title' => 'PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. </p> <p align="justify"> Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. </p> <p align="justify"> On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. </p> <p align="justify"> Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. </p> <p align="justify"> Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter. </p> <p align="justify"> In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. </p> <p align="justify"> Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. </p> <p align="justify"> The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 14 January, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150115/jsp/nation/story_8521.jsp#.VLdnTnvxyBG', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675063, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27018 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty' $metaKeywords = 'Gram Sabha,forest resources,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Rights,Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">"This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas," Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">"We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step," said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">"The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA," Das said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27018, 'title' => 'PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. </p> <p align="justify"> Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. </p> <p align="justify"> On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. </p> <p align="justify"> Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. </p> <p align="justify"> Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter. </p> <p align="justify"> In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. </p> <p align="justify"> Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. </p> <p align="justify"> The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 14 January, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150115/jsp/nation/story_8521.jsp#.VLdnTnvxyBG', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675063, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27018, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gram Sabha,forest resources,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Rights,Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27018, 'title' => 'PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. </p> <p align="justify"> Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. </p> <p align="justify"> On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. </p> <p align="justify"> Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. </p> <p align="justify"> Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter. </p> <p align="justify"> In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. </p> <p align="justify"> Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. </p> <p align="justify"> The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 14 January, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150115/jsp/nation/story_8521.jsp#.VLdnTnvxyBG', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675063, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27018 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty' $metaKeywords = 'Gram Sabha,forest resources,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Rights,Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">"This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas," Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">"We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step," said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">"The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA," Das said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68026f785f7cd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27018, 'title' => 'PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. </p> <p align="justify"> Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. </p> <p align="justify"> On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. </p> <p align="justify"> Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. </p> <p align="justify"> Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter. </p> <p align="justify"> In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. </p> <p align="justify"> Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. </p> <p align="justify"> The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 14 January, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150115/jsp/nation/story_8521.jsp#.VLdnTnvxyBG', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675063, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27018, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gram Sabha,forest resources,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Rights,Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27018, 'title' => 'PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. </p> <p align="justify"> Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. </p> <p align="justify"> On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. </p> <p align="justify"> Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. </p> <p align="justify"> Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter. </p> <p align="justify"> In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. </p> <p align="justify"> Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. </p> <p align="justify"> The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 14 January, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150115/jsp/nation/story_8521.jsp#.VLdnTnvxyBG', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675063, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27018 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty' $metaKeywords = 'Gram Sabha,forest resources,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Rights,Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">&quot;This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas,&quot; Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step,&quot; said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA,&quot; Das said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">"This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas," Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">"We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step," said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">"The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA," Das said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27018, 'title' => 'PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. </p> <p align="justify"> Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. </p> <p align="justify"> On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. </p> <p align="justify"> Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. </p> <p align="justify"> Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. </p> <p align="justify"> "This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas," Panda said in his letter. </p> <p align="justify"> In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. </p> <p align="justify"> Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. </p> <p align="justify"> The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. </p> <p align="justify"> "We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step," said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. </p> <p align="justify"> "The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA," Das said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 14 January, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150115/jsp/nation/story_8521.jsp#.VLdnTnvxyBG', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675063, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27018, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gram Sabha,forest resources,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Rights,Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">"This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas," Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">"We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step," said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">"The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA," Das said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27018, 'title' => 'PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. </p> <p align="justify"> Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. </p> <p align="justify"> The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. </p> <p align="justify"> On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. </p> <p align="justify"> Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. </p> <p align="justify"> Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. </p> <p align="justify"> Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. </p> <p align="justify"> "This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas," Panda said in his letter. </p> <p align="justify"> In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. </p> <p align="justify"> Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. </p> <p align="justify"> The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. </p> <p align="justify"> "We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step," said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. </p> <p align="justify"> Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. </p> <p align="justify"> "The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA," Das said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 14 January, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150115/jsp/nation/story_8521.jsp#.VLdnTnvxyBG', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pmo-signal-on-forest-diversion-basant-kumar-mohanty-4675063', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675063, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27018 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty' $metaKeywords = 'Gram Sabha,forest resources,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Rights,Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO.</p><p align="justify">Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry.</p><p align="justify">The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination.</p><p align="justify">On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930.</p><p align="justify">Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA.</p><p align="justify">Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare.</p><p align="justify">Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order.</p><p align="justify">"This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas," Panda said in his letter.</p><p align="justify">In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order.</p><p align="justify">Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry.</p><p align="justify">The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said.</p><p align="justify">"We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step," said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers.</p><p align="justify">Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals.</p><p align="justify">"The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA," Das said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
PMO signal on forest diversion -Basant Kumar Mohanty |
-The Telegraph New Delhi: The PMO appears to be backing the forest ministry's decision to allow diversion of forestland for linear projects in certain areas without seeking the gram sabha's approval, despite objections raised by the tribal affairs ministry. Although the tribal affairs ministry has strongly protested against the forest ministry's notification of October 28, 2014, on the ground that it violated the Forests Rights Act (FRA), its effort to issue a fresh notification to supersede the earlier one has apparently been held up by the stand taken by the PMO. Official sources said the PMO had supported the relaxation in the FRA provisions as a measure to promote economic growth. Senior PMO officials are learnt to have voiced support for the forest ministry order to Hrushikesh Panda, secretary in the tribal affairs ministry. The tribal affairs ministry has already drawn up draft guidelines on the FRA that would have nullified the forest ministry's order. But with the PMO taking a contrary position, the forest ministry notification has now been sent to the law ministry for examination. On October 28, the forest ministry issued an order saying forestland could be diverted without seeking the gram sabha's consent if plantations on any piece of land were notified as forest after 1930. Such diversion of forestland would be allowed in case of linear projects like roads, canals, laying of pipelines or optical fibre cables and transmission lines. Certain ministries had demanded such relaxation in the FRA. Under the FRA, the gram sabha's consent has to be taken for any diversion of forestland for projects coming up in forest areas. It does not distinguish forests as notified before 1930 and after 1930. It allows exemption for diversion of land for small welfare projects like schools and hospitals where plot requirement is less than one hectare. Panda has already written to Ashok Lavasa, secretary in the forest ministry, in protest against the October 28 order. "This is not desirable in the interests of peace and governance in forest areas," Panda said in his letter. In a co-ordination committee meeting with forest ministry officials, Panda had asserted that the tribal affairs ministry was the nodal agency for implementation of the FRA. If FRA provisions had delayed projects, it should have been brought to the tribal affairs ministry, he said. The meeting had decided that the tribal affairs ministry would issue another notification to supersede the forest ministry order. Environment activists said the PMO line suggested the government was overlooking public concerns to promote industry. The recently promulgated land acquisition ordinance, which did away with seeking landowners' consent to acquire plots for infrastructure projects in public-private-partnership mode, was another such move, they said. "We apprehend that the government wants consent of people to be suppressed completely. The forest ministry's order was a small step. The land acquisition ordinance is another step," said Shankar Gopalkrishnan, the secretary of Campaign for Survival and Dignity, an NGO fighting for the rights of tribals and forest dwellers. Tushar Dash, a researcher at NGO Vasundhara in Bhubaneswar, said the Centre was focused on promoting growth of private industry at the cost of poor tribals. "The forest ministry order was a clear violation of FRA which had put checks and balances for forestland diversion. We have protested against it. But nothing is being done. If the government wants to give relaxation, it should amend the FRA," Das said. |