Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21540, 'title' => 'Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. </p> <p align="justify"> An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. </p> <p align="justify"> In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. </p> <p align="justify"> Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. </p> <p align="justify"> Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. </p> <p align="justify"> Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. </p> <p align="justify"> The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. </p> <p align="justify"> The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em> </p> <p align="justify"> In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p> <p align="justify"> Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. </p> <p align="justify"> This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. </p> <p align="justify"> Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. </p> <p align="justify"> A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 24 June, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study/articleshow/20734563.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21687, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21540, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'metaKeywords' => '12th Five Year Plan,Planning Commission,Economic Growth,economy', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">&quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21540, 'title' => 'Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. </p> <p align="justify"> An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. </p> <p align="justify"> In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. </p> <p align="justify"> Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. </p> <p align="justify"> Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. </p> <p align="justify"> Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. </p> <p align="justify"> The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. </p> <p align="justify"> The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em> </p> <p align="justify"> In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p> <p align="justify"> Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. </p> <p align="justify"> This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. </p> <p align="justify"> Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. </p> <p align="justify"> A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 24 June, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study/articleshow/20734563.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21687, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21540 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot' $metaKeywords = '12th Five Year Plan,Planning Commission,Economic Growth,economy' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">&quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on "more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13" while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">"What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions," Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">"Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective," states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21540, 'title' => 'Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. </p> <p align="justify"> An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. </p> <p align="justify"> In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. </p> <p align="justify"> Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. </p> <p align="justify"> Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. </p> <p align="justify"> Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. </p> <p align="justify"> The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. </p> <p align="justify"> The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em> </p> <p align="justify"> In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p> <p align="justify"> Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. </p> <p align="justify"> This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. </p> <p align="justify"> Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. </p> <p align="justify"> A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 24 June, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study/articleshow/20734563.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21687, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21540, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'metaKeywords' => '12th Five Year Plan,Planning Commission,Economic Growth,economy', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">&quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21540, 'title' => 'Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. </p> <p align="justify"> An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. </p> <p align="justify"> In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. </p> <p align="justify"> Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. </p> <p align="justify"> Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. </p> <p align="justify"> Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. </p> <p align="justify"> The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. </p> <p align="justify"> The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em> </p> <p align="justify"> In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p> <p align="justify"> Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. </p> <p align="justify"> This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. </p> <p align="justify"> Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. </p> <p align="justify"> A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 24 June, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study/articleshow/20734563.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21687, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21540 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot' $metaKeywords = '12th Five Year Plan,Planning Commission,Economic Growth,economy' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">&quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on "more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13" while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">"What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions," Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">"Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective," states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68045cfe1ae72-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21540, 'title' => 'Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. </p> <p align="justify"> An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. </p> <p align="justify"> In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. </p> <p align="justify"> Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. </p> <p align="justify"> Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. </p> <p align="justify"> Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. </p> <p align="justify"> The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. </p> <p align="justify"> The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em> </p> <p align="justify"> In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p> <p align="justify"> Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. </p> <p align="justify"> This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. </p> <p align="justify"> Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. </p> <p align="justify"> A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 24 June, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study/articleshow/20734563.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21687, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21540, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'metaKeywords' => '12th Five Year Plan,Planning Commission,Economic Growth,economy', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">&quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21540, 'title' => 'Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. </p> <p align="justify"> An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. </p> <p align="justify"> In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. </p> <p align="justify"> Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. </p> <p align="justify"> Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. </p> <p align="justify"> Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. </p> <p align="justify"> The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. </p> <p align="justify"> The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em> </p> <p align="justify"> In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p> <p align="justify"> Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. </p> <p align="justify"> This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. </p> <p align="justify"> Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. </p> <p align="justify"> A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 24 June, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study/articleshow/20734563.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21687, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21540 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot' $metaKeywords = '12th Five Year Plan,Planning Commission,Economic Growth,economy' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on &quot;more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13&quot; while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">&quot;What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions,&quot; Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective,&quot; states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on "more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13" while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">"What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions," Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">"Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective," states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21540, 'title' => 'Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. </p> <p align="justify"> An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. </p> <p align="justify"> In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. </p> <p align="justify"> Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on "more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13" while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. </p> <p align="justify"> Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. </p> <p align="justify"> Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. </p> <p align="justify"> The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. </p> <p align="justify"> The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em> </p> <p align="justify"> In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. </p> <p align="justify"> "What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions," Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. </p> <p align="justify"> "Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective," states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p> <p align="justify"> Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. </p> <p align="justify"> This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. </p> <p align="justify"> Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. </p> <p align="justify"> A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 24 June, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study/articleshow/20734563.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21687, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21540, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'metaKeywords' => '12th Five Year Plan,Planning Commission,Economic Growth,economy', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on "more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13" while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">"What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions," Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">"Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective," states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21540, 'title' => 'Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. </p> <p align="justify"> An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. </p> <p align="justify"> In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. </p> <p align="justify"> Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on "more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13" while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. </p> <p align="justify"> Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. </p> <p align="justify"> Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. </p> <p align="justify"> The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. </p> <p align="justify"> The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em> </p> <p align="justify"> In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. </p> <p align="justify"> "What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions," Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. </p> <p align="justify"> The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. </p> <p align="justify"> "Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective," states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p> <p align="justify"> Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. </p> <p align="justify"> This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. </p> <p align="justify"> Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. </p> <p align="justify"> A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 24 June, 2013, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study/articleshow/20734563.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'policy-paralysis-could-numb-12th-five-year-plan-growth-planning-commission-study-vikas-dhoot-21687', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21687, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21540 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot' $metaKeywords = '12th Five Year Plan,Planning Commission,Economic Growth,economy' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times NEW DELHI: A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government. An independent think...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Economic Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>A study commissioned by the Planning Commission to validate the growth estimates of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan has thrown up a rather depressing outlook for the economy, sending alarm bells ringing in the government.</p><p align="justify">An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through.</p><p align="justify">In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps.</p><p align="justify">Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on "more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13" while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%.</p><p align="justify">Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%.</p><p align="justify">Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations.</p><p align="justify">The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%.</p><p align="justify">The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year.</p><p align="justify"><em>Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study</em></p><p align="justify">In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission.</p><p align="justify">"What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions," Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17.</p><p align="justify">The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy.</p><p align="justify">"Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective," states the plan's macro-economic framework. </p><p align="justify">Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade.</p><p align="justify">This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%.</p><p align="justify">Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period.</p><p align="justify">A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study -Vikas Dhoot |
-The Economic Times
An independent think tank, the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), has pegged average annual growth for the Twelfth Plan at a mere 4.8%, if the present logjam in policymaking continues. The NCAER had been entrusted by the Planning Commission to use econometric models to derive key macro-economic indicators for this five-year plan. The NCAER analysis uses three different scenarios for growth based on the extent of reforms that can be pushed through. In all three scenarios, the NCAER has found that the Twelfth Plan would see slower growth than the Eleventh Plan, which saw 7.9% expansion between 2007 and 2012. Though the NCAER presented its findings to the Plan panel in April, they have been kept under wraps. Reviewed by ET, the NCAER models are based on "more recent data till 2011-12 and 2012-13" while the plan document's growth simulations for each scenario were carried out last year using data up to 2011-12, when the Indian economy grew by 6.2%. Assuming a 'business as usual' approach - the worst-case scenario, in which the policy logjam would persist - the Plan panel had assumed growth of 5-5.5%. In contrast, the NCAER study says growth would slip to below 5%. Even under the 'insufficient action' scenario, growth won't meet the government's expectations. The government expects that under the 'insufficient action' scenario - which envisages a piecemeal approach to reforms - growth will be 6-6.5%. But the NCAER expects it to be just 5.9%. The Twelfth Plan document had pegged average growth at 8.2% assuming a best-case scenario of strong, inclusive growth delivered by all-round government action. But even in this scenario, the NCAER sees growth at 7.8% over the five-year plan that is already in its second year. Policy paralysis could numb 12th five year plan growth: Planning Commission study In 2012-13, the first year of the plan, the economy expanded only 5%, the slowest pace in a decade. Since the first year of the plan saw slower-than-anticipated growth, overall expansion is likely to be lower, said Pronab Sen, the chairperson of the National Statistical Commission. "What is more critical is the trajectory of growth and the trends beyond the headline growth, in key economic indicators such as the investment rate. The real question is if the public policy approach outlined in the plan document is consistent with the high-growth scenario it envisions," Sen said, stressing that an average growth of 7.8% in the Twelfth Plan would mean growth could soar to 8-9% by 2016-17. The NCAER's assessment matches the sentiment among industry captains that the worst is yet to come. Last week, the Confederation of Indian Industry said the industrial slowdown has not bottomed out and sluggish private and government capital expenditure is hurting investment in industry and the economy. "Strong inclusive growth is the only way for the country to go and the policy agenda laid out in the plan is designed to achieve the objective," states the plan's macro-economic framework. Unless there's a dramatic shifting of gears by the economy's managers, the assessment carried out by the NCAER expects growth in 2016-17 to be just 5%. The first year of the plan period, 2012-13, also logged 5% growth - the slowest pace in a decade. This means the intervening three years, including this financial year, could see much more pain for the economy as the NCAER expects average annual growth over the five-year period at just 4.8% in the worst-case scenario. Back-of-the-envelope calculations based on this fresh projection indicate that average growth from this year till 2015-16 would, therefore, hover in the range of 4.6-4.7%. Such a slow pace of growth would have a deleterious effect on all key economic indicators, such as the current account and fiscal deficits, investment rate, poverty ratio and inflation. Without coherent and big-ticket policy action, average inflation is expected to be 7.9% through this plan period, fiscal deficit could be at an average 5.3% of GDP and the fixed investment rate may plummet to 28.7% from the 31.8% recorded over the Eleventh Plan period. A slower economy would also mean only a marginal improvement in poverty numbers from the 28% recorded in 2011-12, to 26.8% - of course, based on the Planning Commission's contentious poverty line. The current account deficit, NCAER has estimated, would soar to 3.8% of GDP compared to the 2.7% averaged between 2007 and 2012. |