Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 February, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130212/jsp/frontpage/story_16551320.jsp#.URni5Df-Xtk&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19368,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;electricity,Energy&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 February, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130212/jsp/frontpage/story_16551320.jsp#.URni5Df-Xtk&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19368,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19233
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;electricity,Energy&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.<br /><br />Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.<br /><br />&ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&rdquo; said a power ministry official.<br /><br />&lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&rdquo; he added.<br /><br />According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.<br /><br />The power ministry&rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.<br /><br />Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.<br /><br />While CIL contended that the plant would &ldquo;sterilise&rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.<br /><br />&ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&rdquo; explained a source.<br /><br />The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.<br /><br />&ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.<br /><br />During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 February, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130212/jsp/frontpage/story_16551320.jsp#.URni5Df-Xtk&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19368,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;electricity,Energy&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 February, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130212/jsp/frontpage/story_16551320.jsp#.URni5Df-Xtk&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19368,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19233
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;electricity,Energy&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.<br /><br />Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.<br /><br />&ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&rdquo; said a power ministry official.<br /><br />&lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&rdquo; he added.<br /><br />According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.<br /><br />The power ministry&rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.<br /><br />Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.<br /><br />While CIL contended that the plant would &ldquo;sterilise&rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.<br /><br />&ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&rdquo; explained a source.<br /><br />The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.<br /><br />&ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.<br /><br />During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6805aaa6f2c87-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 February, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130212/jsp/frontpage/story_16551320.jsp#.URni5Df-Xtk&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19368,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;electricity,Energy&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19233,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 February, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130212/jsp/frontpage/story_16551320.jsp#.URni5Df-Xtk&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19368,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19233
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;electricity,Energy&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&amp;rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&amp;rdquo; said a power ministry official.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The power ministry&amp;rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&amp;rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&amp;rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While CIL contended that the plant would &amp;ldquo;sterilise&amp;rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&amp;rdquo; explained a source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &amp;mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&amp;rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.<br /><br />Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.<br /><br />&ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&rdquo; said a power ministry official.<br /><br />&lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&rdquo; he added.<br /><br />According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.<br /><br />The power ministry&rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.<br /><br />Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.<br /><br />While CIL contended that the plant would &ldquo;sterilise&rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.<br /><br />&ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&rdquo; explained a source.<br /><br />The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.<br /><br />&ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.<br /><br />During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 19233,
		'title' => 'Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.<br />
<br />
Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&rdquo; said a power ministry official.<br />
<br />
&lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&rdquo; he added.<br />
<br />
According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.<br />
<br />
The power ministry&rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.<br />
<br />
Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.<br />
<br />
While CIL contended that the plant would &ldquo;sterilise&rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&rdquo; explained a source.<br />
<br />
The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.<br />
<br />
During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 February, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130212/jsp/frontpage/story_16551320.jsp#.URni5Df-Xtk',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 19368,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 19233,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya',
	'metaKeywords' => 'electricity,Energy',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.<br /><br />Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.<br /><br />&ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&rdquo; said a power ministry official.<br /><br />&lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&rdquo; he added.<br /><br />According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.<br /><br />The power ministry&rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.<br /><br />Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.<br /><br />While CIL contended that the plant would &ldquo;sterilise&rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.<br /><br />&ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&rdquo; explained a source.<br /><br />The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.<br /><br />&ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.<br /><br />During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 19233,
	'title' => 'Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.<br />
<br />
Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&rdquo; said a power ministry official.<br />
<br />
&lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&rdquo; he added.<br />
<br />
According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.<br />
<br />
The power ministry&rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.<br />
<br />
Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.<br />
<br />
While CIL contended that the plant would &ldquo;sterilise&rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&rdquo; explained a source.<br />
<br />
The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.<br />
<br />
During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 February, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130212/jsp/frontpage/story_16551320.jsp#.URni5Df-Xtk',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'power-ministry-push-for-ntpc-plant-sumi-sukanya-19368',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 19368,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 19233
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya'
$metaKeywords = 'electricity,Energy'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.

Setting...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura.<br /><br />Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters.<br /><br />&ldquo;The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC&rsquo;s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,&rdquo; said a power ministry official.<br /><br />&lsquo;The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers&rsquo; (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,&rdquo; he added.<br /><br />According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday.<br /><br />The power ministry&rsquo;s move follows a group of ministers&rsquo; decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated.<br /><br />Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA&rsquo;s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war.<br /><br />While CIL contended that the plant would &ldquo;sterilise&rdquo; 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore.<br /><br />&ldquo;Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,&rdquo; explained a source.<br /><br />The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options &mdash; relocating the plant or reducing its size.<br /><br />&ldquo;The GoM chose the latter,&rdquo; the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent.<br /><br />During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Power ministry push for NTPC plant -Sumi Sukanya

-The Telegraph Union power ministry is understood to have decided to go ahead with its 1980MW project covering Chatra and Hazaribagh districts, overriding coal ministry objections but has agreed to cut down land use for the proposed plant in North Karanpura. Setting aside objections of the coal ministry, which wanted the project shifted out of the coal-rich area, the power ministry has now moved a draft cabinet note indicating its resolve to go ahead with the project at the original site of North Karanpura, 65km from the district headquarters. “The power ministry has moved a draft CCI (cabinet committee on infrastructure) note seeking to give directions to the coal ministry for reviving fuel linkages to NTPC’s (National Thermal Power Corporation) proposed 1980 MW power plant,” said a power ministry official. ‘The note cites a go-ahead by a group of ministers’ (GoM) panel for the power plant at the same site after downsizing it,” he added. According to sources, a final draft on the project could now be brought before the Union cabinet for approval as early as on Wednesday. The power ministry’s move follows a group of ministers’ decision last year to cut down the size of the plant even as the coal ministry insisted that it be relocated. Work on the project, first envisaged in 1998 during the NDA’s tenure at the Centre, began in 2003. But it was stalled in mid-2009 as the 1,500 acres it was coming up on was identified as a coal block with reserves to the tune of 6 billion tonnes. After this, Coal India Limited (CIL) and NTPC got tangled in a turf war. While CIL contended that the plant would “sterilise” 6 billion tonnes of coal which could be used to produce over 50,000 MW of electricity, NTPC argued that it could not pull out of North Karanpura after investing close to Rs 250 crore. “Both ministries have been at loggerheads over the issue for over a decade. In December last year, the coal ministry circulated a note for shifting the site to Kanhachati village in Chatra district and had sought the views of various ministries to be placed before CCI,” explained a source. The GoM had earlier constituted a panel, headed by planning commission member B.K. Chaturvedi, to look into the controversy. It suggested two options — relocating the plant or reducing its size. “The GoM chose the latter,” the source said, adding that NTPC agreed to cut down land use for the project by about 40 per cent. During the winter session of Parliament, Jyotiradatiya Scindia, minister of state (independent charge) in the power ministry, had also made it clear that the Centre had decided to go ahead with the project at North Karanpura.