Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14158, 'title' => 'Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 10 April, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-Government-panel/articleshow/12602331.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14282, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14158, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gender,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14158, 'title' => 'Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 10 April, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-Government-panel/articleshow/12602331.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14282, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14158 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh' $metaKeywords = 'Gender,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, "No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees," the member said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience," the report said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14158, 'title' => 'Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 10 April, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-Government-panel/articleshow/12602331.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14282, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14158, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gender,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14158, 'title' => 'Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 10 April, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-Government-panel/articleshow/12602331.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14282, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14158 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh' $metaKeywords = 'Gender,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, "No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees," the member said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience," the report said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68019f68664d1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68019f68664d1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14158, 'title' => 'Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 10 April, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-Government-panel/articleshow/12602331.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14282, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14158, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gender,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14158, 'title' => 'Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 10 April, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-Government-panel/articleshow/12602331.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14282, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14158 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh' $metaKeywords = 'Gender,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp; The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, &quot;No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees,&quot; the member said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience,&quot; the report said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, "No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees," the member said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience," the report said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14158, 'title' => 'Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, "No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees," the member said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience," the report said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 10 April, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-Government-panel/articleshow/12602331.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14282, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 14158, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gender,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, "No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees," the member said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience," the report said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 14158, 'title' => 'Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, "No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees," the member said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience," the report said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 10 April, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-Government-panel/articleshow/12602331.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'pregnant-women-should-not-be-sacked-government-panel-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-14282', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 14282, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 14158 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh' $metaKeywords = 'Gender,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, "No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees," the member said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience," the report said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Pregnant women should not be sacked: Government panel by Mahendra Kumar Singh |
To plug loopholes in the law on maternity benefits, a government panel has suggested an amendment forbidding the sacking of a pregnant employee on any ground. The Planning Commission's working group which had been asked to review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 has also recommended increasing the duration of maternity leave, though it did not specify by how days it should be increased. The group wants the government to incorporate a clause in the Act, saying, "No woman should be discharged from service during the period of pregnancy on any pretext." A panel member said although the existing maternity law prohibits the sacking of a pregnant employee, there were many examples where employers have sacked pregnant women for 'misconduct' to avoid giving them maternity benefits. Under the existing law, a pregnant woman can be fired for gross misconduct. "The move is to plug this loophole and ensure protection to pregnant employees," the member said. The panel, headed by the women and child development secretary, was in favour of making maternity leave flexible, allowing a mother to take it according to her convenience. As of now, women are entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave. "Review the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 with a view to increasing the number of days of leave that a woman worker can take and to give her the choice of utilizing the period of paid absence as per her convenience," the report said. The panel also wanted the government to sensitize the various committees for implementation of labour laws on issues relating to gender. These committees should be made functional and special cells should be formed to monitor implementation of legislation for women workers, the group suggested. During the 11th Five Year Plan period, the government has taken steps to ensure safe and secure motherhood through various schemes such as Janini Suraksha Yojana to encourage institutional deliveries and the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana for conditional cash transfers to mothers during their pregnancy. Times View Women form an increasingly larger part of the workforce and that trend is only likely to accelerate in future. It makes sense therefore for societies to adapt to this development. Clearly demanding that women choose between work and motherhood is unfair. It follows that employers must adjust to the fact that women will need to take long periods off for maternity. This is a small price to pay as a society for bringing in women into the mainstream of paid labour.
|