Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3110, 'title' => 'Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 September, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Preparatory-info-of-Cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-RTI-CIC/articleshow/6507839.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3197, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3110, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3110, 'title' => 'Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 September, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Preparatory-info-of-Cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-RTI-CIC/articleshow/6507839.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3197, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3110 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are "actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. "Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note "but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >"A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between "the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the "stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is "complete and over". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3110, 'title' => 'Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 September, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Preparatory-info-of-Cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-RTI-CIC/articleshow/6507839.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3197, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3110, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3110, 'title' => 'Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 September, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Preparatory-info-of-Cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-RTI-CIC/articleshow/6507839.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3197, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3110 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are "actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. "Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note "but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >"A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between "the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the "stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is "complete and over". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe9f16b5df-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3110, 'title' => 'Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 September, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Preparatory-info-of-Cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-RTI-CIC/articleshow/6507839.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3197, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3110, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3110, 'title' => 'Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 September, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Preparatory-info-of-Cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-RTI-CIC/articleshow/6507839.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3197, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3110 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are &quot;actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. &quot;Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note &quot;but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&quot;A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between &quot;the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the &quot;stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is &quot;complete and over&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are "actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. "Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note "but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >"A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between "the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the "stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is "complete and over". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3110, 'title' => 'Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are "actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. "Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note "but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Commission sought to distinguish between "the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the "stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is "complete and over". </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 September, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Preparatory-info-of-Cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-RTI-CIC/articleshow/6507839.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3197, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3110, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are "actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. "Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note "but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >"A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between "the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the "stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is "complete and over". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3110, 'title' => 'Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are "actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. "Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note "but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Commission sought to distinguish between "the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the "stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is "complete and over". </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 September, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Preparatory-info-of-Cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-RTI-CIC/articleshow/6507839.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'preparatory-info-of-cabinet-documents-can-be-disclosed-under-rti-cic-3197', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 3197, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3110 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >Pushing the envelope regarding disclosure of confidential information, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that documents are open to public before being submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat for the Union Cabinet's consideration. This is a departure from the usual practice in the government where most public authorities took a wide view and denied all information related to Cabinet notes on the plea that the issue was under consideration and had not been finalised. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are "actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. "Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note "but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >"A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Commission sought to distinguish between "the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the "stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is "complete and over". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Preparatory info of Cabinet documents can be disclosed under RTI: CIC |
A full bench of the Commission has decided that proposals formulated by the ministries get cover under the exemption clause of the RTI Act only when they are "actually'' submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat to be placed for discussion among the Cabinet members. The RTI Act under section 8(1)(i) exempts from disclosure Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers till the decision has been taken. "Exemption under section 8(1)(i) will apply only when a note is submitted by the ministry that has formulated it to the Cabinet Secretariat for placing this before the Cabinet. All concomitant information preceding that, which does not constitute a part of that Cabinet Note, will then be open to disclosure,'' the CIC said. The records which went into preparation of a Cabinet note "but is not a part of it'' have to be provided to an RTI applicant as per the provisions of the law, according to the Commission. "A note that is withdrawn would therefore not constitute a Cabinet Note and would consequently qualify for disclosure,'' the order issued by a bench comprising chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and information commissioners Satyananda Mishra and Deepak Sandhu said. The case relates to activist Venkatesh Nayak who sought a copy of the draft whistleblowers bill from the Department of Personnel and Training. The Commission sought to distinguish between "the stage of formulation'' when disclosure of the draft legislation leading to policy is mandatory, as against the "stage of finalisation'' when it will constitute a document exempt from disclosure. The Bench said once a draft is submitted to the Cabinet Secretariat, with all its necessary attachments for submission to the Cabinet, it would remain exempt from disclosure till such time as the decision has been taken and action to be taken thereon is "complete and over". In Nayak's case, the Bench rejected disclosure of the Bill citing violation of Parliamentary privileges. |