Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682617,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,beef,Beef Consumption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682617,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34512
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,beef,Beef Consumption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&quot;Of course, the judgment will have..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.<br /><br />&quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.<br /><br />&quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.<br /><br />Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)<br /><br />Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment's quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.<br /><br />During today's brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday's verdict.<br /><br />He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh's stand.<br /><br />Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &quot;larger bench&quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.<br /><br />Bombay High Court had described as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.<br /><br />It had said that only &quot;conscious possession&quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682617,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,beef,Beef Consumption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682617,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34512
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,beef,Beef Consumption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&quot;Of course, the judgment will have..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.<br /><br />&quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.<br /><br />&quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.<br /><br />Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)<br /><br />Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment's quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.<br /><br />During today's brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday's verdict.<br /><br />He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh's stand.<br /><br />Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &quot;larger bench&quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.<br /><br />Bombay High Court had described as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.<br /><br />It had said that only &quot;conscious possession&quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eef3ba3a820-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682617,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,beef,Beef Consumption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34512,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682617,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34512
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,beef,Beef Consumption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today said that yesterday&#039;s nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&amp;quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra&#039;s ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment&#039;s quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During today&#039;s brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday&#039;s verdict.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh&#039;s stand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &amp;quot;larger bench&amp;quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bombay High Court had described as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It had said that only &amp;quot;conscious possession&amp;quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&quot;Of course, the judgment will have..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.<br /><br />&quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.<br /><br />&quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.<br /><br />Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)<br /><br />Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment's quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.<br /><br />During today's brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday's verdict.<br /><br />He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh's stand.<br /><br />Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &quot;larger bench&quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.<br /><br />Bombay High Court had described as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.<br /><br />It had said that only &quot;conscious possession&quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 34512,
		'title' => 'Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.<br />
<br />
&quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.<br />
<br />
&quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.<br />
<br />
Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)<br />
<br />
Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment's quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.<br />
<br />
During today's brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday's verdict.<br />
<br />
He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh's stand.<br />
<br />
Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &quot;larger bench&quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.<br />
<br />
Bombay High Court had described as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.<br />
<br />
It had said that only &quot;conscious possession&quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter">click here</a> to read more. 
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 August, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4682617,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 34512,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Privacy,Privacy Rights,beef,Beef Consumption',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&quot;Of course, the judgment will have...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.<br /><br />&quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.<br /><br />&quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.<br /><br />Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)<br /><br />Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment's quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.<br /><br />During today's brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday's verdict.<br /><br />He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh's stand.<br /><br />Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &quot;larger bench&quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.<br /><br />Bombay High Court had described as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.<br /><br />It had said that only &quot;conscious possession&quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 34512,
	'title' => 'Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.<br />
<br />
&quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.<br />
<br />
&quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.<br />
<br />
Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)<br />
<br />
Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment's quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.<br />
<br />
During today's brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday's verdict.<br />
<br />
He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh's stand.<br />
<br />
Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &quot;larger bench&quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.<br />
<br />
Bombay High Court had described as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.<br />
<br />
It had said that only &quot;conscious possession&quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter">click here</a> to read more. 
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 August, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'privacy-impact-on-beef-r-balaji-4682617',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4682617,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 34512
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji'
$metaKeywords = 'Privacy,Privacy Rights,beef,Beef Consumption'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.

&quot;Of course, the judgment will have...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year.<br /><br />&quot;Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench,&quot; the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners.<br /><br />&quot;I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress,&quot; Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday.<br /><br />Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.)<br /><br />Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment's quashing of the ban on beef possession and import.<br /><br />During today's brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday's verdict.<br /><br />He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh's stand.<br /><br />Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a &quot;larger bench&quot; - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment.<br /><br />Bombay High Court had described as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.<br /><br />It had said that only &quot;conscious possession&quot; of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170826/jsp/frontpage/story_169261.jsp#.WaDgK7mTYZM.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Privacy impact on beef -R Balaji

-The Telegraph New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that yesterday's nine-judge verdict declaring privacy a fundamental right could have a bearing on the Maharashtra government's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks last year. "Of course, the judgment will have an impact on these cases.... If necessary, we may refer these cases to a larger bench," the bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan told a batch of petitioners. "I do not think that anybody would like to be told by the State what they should eat or how they should dress," Justice J. Chelameswar, a member of the nine-judge bench, had observed in his separate but concurring judgment yesterday. Today, the two-judge bench was hearing pleas against a Bombay High Court verdict of May 2016 that upheld Maharashtra's ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks while quashing the outlawing of the possession of beef and its import from outside the state. (Cow slaughter has been banned in the state since 1976.) Scores of butchers and meat sellers had challenged the ban on bull and bullock slaughter, arguing it violated their fundamental rights to eat what they wanted and to carry out their profession. The Maharashtra government too had appealed against the high court judgment's quashing of the ban on beef possession and import. During today's brief hearing, senior advocate C.U. Singh, appearing for the meat sellers and butchers, said the court needed to look afresh at the Maharashtra law in the light of yesterday's verdict. He added that a re-look was needed also at an October 2005 ruling by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench that upheld a ban on the slaughter of cows and bulls in Gujarat. Senior advocate Indira Jaising endorsed Singh's stand. Justice Sikri, who headed the two-judge bench, said the court would take the matter up after two weeks and decide whether it should be referred to a "larger bench" - the standard practice when it came to interpreting a constitution bench judgment. Bombay High Court had described as "unconstitutional" the provision that mere possession of beef was a crime in Maharashtra, citing the right to choice of food, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. It had said that only "conscious possession" of the meat of bovine animals slaughtered in the state would be an offence. Please click here to read more.