Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802877389979-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802877389979-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802877389979-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17340, 'title' => 'Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 9 October, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Proposed-land-bill-runs-into-Antony-wall/articleshow/16731619.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17468, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17340, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17340, 'title' => 'Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 9 October, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Proposed-land-bill-runs-into-Antony-wall/articleshow/16731619.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17468, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17340 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. "Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies," he said, counseling caution. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as "pro-farmer". An official said, "From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country. </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802877389979-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802877389979-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802877389979-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17340, 'title' => 'Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 9 October, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Proposed-land-bill-runs-into-Antony-wall/articleshow/16731619.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17468, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17340, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17340, 'title' => 'Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 9 October, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Proposed-land-bill-runs-into-Antony-wall/articleshow/16731619.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17468, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17340 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. "Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies," he said, counseling caution. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as "pro-farmer". An official said, "From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country. </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802877389979-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802877389979-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802877389979-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802877389979-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17340, 'title' => 'Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 9 October, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Proposed-land-bill-runs-into-Antony-wall/articleshow/16731619.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17468, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17340, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17340, 'title' => 'Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 9 October, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Proposed-land-bill-runs-into-Antony-wall/articleshow/16731619.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17468, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17340 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. &quot;Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies,&quot; he said, counseling caution.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&amp;R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as &quot;pro-farmer&quot;. An official said, &quot;From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.&nbsp;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. "Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies," he said, counseling caution. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as "pro-farmer". An official said, "From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country. </div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17340, 'title' => 'Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. "Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies," he said, counseling caution. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as "pro-farmer". An official said, "From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 9 October, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Proposed-land-bill-runs-into-Antony-wall/articleshow/16731619.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17468, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17340, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. "Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies," he said, counseling caution. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as "pro-farmer". An official said, "From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country. </div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17340, 'title' => 'Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. "Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies," he said, counseling caution. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as "pro-farmer". An official said, "From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 9 October, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Proposed-land-bill-runs-into-Antony-wall/articleshow/16731619.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'proposed-land-bill-runs-into-antony-wall-subodh-ghildiyal-17468', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17468, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17340 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. "Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies," he said, counseling caution. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as "pro-farmer". An official said, "From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country. </div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Proposed land bill runs into Antony wall -Subodh Ghildiyal |
-The Times of India Top Congress leader and defence minister A K Antony said government should not acquire land for private entities since it is a big trigger for agitations, reverting the debate over land acquisition bill to the strict norms that were sought to be diluted on the pretext of industrialization. Antony told the Sharad Pawar-led group of ministers debating the proposed bill that land had become a scarce resource and acquisition was a source of resentment among people. "Then why should the government acquire land for private bodies," he said, counseling caution. He recalled that the parliamentary standing committee had also recommended that government keep away from acquiring land for private projects. Antony told the ministerial panel on Monday that government should intervene only for private entities that buy 90% of required land on their own. He added that government could acquire land for 'Public Private Partnership' projects after 90% of owners give consent. While there was not much reaction to Antony's comments in the meeting, the formula for minimal state role in acquisition for private parties could stem the pressure for dilution of the bill-in-the-works on the ground that it would help industrialization and urbanization. While the original draft stated that consent of 80% land owners was must for acquisition, it was reduced to 67% after reservations that such provision would be an obstacle to industry seeking land expeditiously. The flagship bill was referred to the Pawar-led panel after serious opposition in the Cabinet meeting. While rural development minister Jairam Ramesh has since argued that core provisions relating to consent of owners, 'social impact assessment' and R&R could not be tampered with since they were part of Congress's election promise, the pressure to make the bill industry-friendly has been visible. Antony's view could check dilution beyond the bottom line seen as a must to show it as "pro-farmer". An official said, "From 80% to 67%, Antony's strong pitch can save the equation for farmers which appeared to be slipping away." The 90% equation runs close to the land bill finalized in UPA-1 before the Centre buckled under pressure and redrafted the legislation. The new draft may acquire teeth if Antony's suggestions are accepted. It has already put SEZ Act in its ambit, implying that acquisition for special enclaves would have to conform to norms relating to rehabilitation and procedures. Tribal affairs minister Kishore Chandra Deo has asked the GoM to put coal and mining related laws under the ambit of acquisition act. If accepted, the bill would take care of big chunk of acquisition that takes place in the country.
|