Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef989807058-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef989807058-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef989807058-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21704,
'title' => 'Protect, don’t snoop',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/protect-dont-snoop/article4895582.ece?homepage=true',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'protect-dont-snoop-21852',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 21852,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 21704,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop',
'metaKeywords' => 'internet,Privacy,E-Governance',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21704,
'title' => 'Protect, don’t snoop',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/protect-dont-snoop/article4895582.ece?homepage=true',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'protect-dont-snoop-21852',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 21852,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 21704
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop'
$metaKeywords = 'internet,Privacy,E-Governance'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/protect-dont-snoop-21852.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Protect, don’t snoop</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to "coordinate all matters relating to cyber security," a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef989807058-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef989807058-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef989807058-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21704,
'title' => 'Protect, don’t snoop',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/protect-dont-snoop/article4895582.ece?homepage=true',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'protect-dont-snoop-21852',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 21852,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 21704,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop',
'metaKeywords' => 'internet,Privacy,E-Governance',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21704,
'title' => 'Protect, don’t snoop',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/protect-dont-snoop/article4895582.ece?homepage=true',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'protect-dont-snoop-21852',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 21852,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 21704
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop'
$metaKeywords = 'internet,Privacy,E-Governance'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/protect-dont-snoop-21852.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Protect, don’t snoop</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to "coordinate all matters relating to cyber security," a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef989807058-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef989807058-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef989807058-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef989807058-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21704,
'title' => 'Protect, don’t snoop',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/protect-dont-snoop/article4895582.ece?homepage=true',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'protect-dont-snoop-21852',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 21852,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 21704,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop',
'metaKeywords' => 'internet,Privacy,E-Governance',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21704,
'title' => 'Protect, don’t snoop',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/protect-dont-snoop/article4895582.ece?homepage=true',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'protect-dont-snoop-21852',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 21852,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 21704
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop'
$metaKeywords = 'internet,Privacy,E-Governance'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to &quot;coordinate all matters relating to cyber security,&quot; a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/protect-dont-snoop-21852.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Protect, don’t snoop</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to "coordinate all matters relating to cyber security," a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21704,
'title' => 'Protect, don’t snoop',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to "coordinate all matters relating to cyber security," a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/protect-dont-snoop/article4895582.ece?homepage=true',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'protect-dont-snoop-21852',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 21852,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 21704,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop',
'metaKeywords' => 'internet,Privacy,E-Governance',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to "coordinate all matters relating to cyber security," a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 21704,
'title' => 'Protect, don’t snoop',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to "coordinate all matters relating to cyber security," a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 9 July, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/protect-dont-snoop/article4895582.ece?homepage=true',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'protect-dont-snoop-21852',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 21852,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 21704
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Protect, don’t snoop'
$metaKeywords = 'internet,Privacy,E-Governance'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify"><br /> Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.</p><p align="justify">Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to "coordinate all matters relating to cyber security," a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Much like the space it aims to protect, India's cyber security policy, launched this week, is characterised by a striking duality of purpose. On the one hand, it seeks to guard, and thus strengthen, the country's strategic assets and online intelligence infrastructure. On the other, it hopes to secure the transactions of citizens, companies and public services on the web. The latter, more enabling goal is intended to promote the volume of e-commerce and the reliability of e-governance in India. But any attempt to harmonise the two objectives must be weighed against the United Progressive Alliance's track record on Internet regulation. This cyber security policy emerges from a government that has systematically brought its legislative tools (Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000) and surveillance machinery (the Central Monitoring System) to bear adversely on privacy. Protecting cyber space, as the policy acknowledges, involves streamlining best practices in data security, identifying sensitive and vulnerable online content, and monitoring compliance - aspects that require entrenched collaboration between various government bodies, telecom and Internet giants, corporate entities, as well as enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is important to ensure the cyber security policy does not end up institutionalising the flow of private data to the government's already vast and unregulated snooping systems.
Unfortunately, this is precisely the direction the policy takes in its current avatar. The UPA has sought to create national nodal agencies to "coordinate all matters relating to cyber security," a task that includes spelling out policy guidelines, managing crises, and performing periodic security audits. The power to propose, implement and monitor India's cyber security regulations has been concentrated in the hands of a few agencies without specifying what participatory role, if any, civil society and industry will play in them. Where Information and Communication Technology guidelines are prescriptive, the government plans to offer tax incentives for companies conforming to them, effectively coercing the latter into obedience. Most importantly, the policy fails to address the scope of oversight, parliamentary or judicial, that such entities will be subject to. Already, India's CMS thrives on telephonic and internet surveillance that is unbridled by law. Where legislation exists, like in the United States, Britain and France, it has struggled to keep pace with changes in technology. The UPA's cyber security policy is a laudable attempt to stay ahead of this curve. But the government should now orient its goals towards protecting India's networked society and economy, not policing them.
