Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4705, 'title' => 'Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 December, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/11/stories/2010121167471400.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4796, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4705, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'metaKeywords' => 'media,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => 'Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4705, 'title' => 'Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 December, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/11/stories/2010121167471400.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4796, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4705 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre' $metaKeywords = 'media,Corruption' $metaDesc = 'Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing “private conversations of Ms. Radia” infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: “Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, “an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,” the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: “It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. “There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. “If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4705, 'title' => 'Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 December, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/11/stories/2010121167471400.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4796, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4705, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'metaKeywords' => 'media,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => 'Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4705, 'title' => 'Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 December, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/11/stories/2010121167471400.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4796, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4705 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre' $metaKeywords = 'media,Corruption' $metaDesc = 'Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing “private conversations of Ms. Radia” infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: “Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, “an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,” the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: “It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. “There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. “If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8faee995ed-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4705, 'title' => 'Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 December, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/11/stories/2010121167471400.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4796, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4705, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'metaKeywords' => 'media,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => 'Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4705, 'title' => 'Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 December, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/11/stories/2010121167471400.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4796, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4705 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre' $metaKeywords = 'media,Corruption' $metaDesc = 'Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing &ldquo;private conversations of Ms. Radia&rdquo; infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: &ldquo;Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, &ldquo;an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,&rdquo; the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: &ldquo;It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. &ldquo;There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. &ldquo;If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing “private conversations of Ms. Radia” infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: “Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, “an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,” the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: “It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. “There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. “If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4705, 'title' => 'Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing “private conversations of Ms. Radia” infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: “Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, “an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,” the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: “It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. “There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. “If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 December, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/11/stories/2010121167471400.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4796, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4705, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'metaKeywords' => 'media,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => 'Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing “private conversations of Ms. Radia” infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: “Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, “an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,” the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: “It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. “There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. “If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4705, 'title' => 'Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing “private conversations of Ms. Radia” infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: “Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, “an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,” the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: “It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. “There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. “If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 11 December, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/12/11/stories/2010121167471400.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'radia-tapes-didnt-leak-from-it-department-centre-4796', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4796, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4705 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre' $metaKeywords = 'media,Corruption' $metaDesc = 'Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapesInvestigations not yet over, no question of destroying recordsThe Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing “private conversations of Ms. Radia” infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: “Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nevertheless, “an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,” the affidavit said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: “It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. “There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Sensitive conversations</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. “If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Radia tapes didn't leak from IT Department: Centre |
Affidavit silent on Tata's plea to stop further publication of tapes Investigations not yet over, no question of destroying records The Income Tax Department, which had recorded telephonic conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia, was not responsible for the leak of the tapes, a common affidavit filed by the Centre in the Supreme Court said on Friday. In its reply to the writ petition filed by industrialist Rata Tata alleging that publication of the tapes containing “private conversations of Ms. Radia” infringed his right to privacy, the Centre said: “Never in the past had any electronic intercept made by the IT Department appeared in the media.” Nevertheless, “an inquiry into this matter is in progress and on the basis of the material which is available, there is no reason to believe that the telephone intercepts have been leaked from the IT department. The petition has been filed on the assumption that the authority would be within its power to wiretap and record such conversations. The respondents have taken every step to ensure that what was recorded by them stayed secure in their custody,” the affidavit said. On Mr. Tata's plea that the tapes be retrieved, the Centre said: “It is not possible or practical for the government to take steps to retrieve the various copies of some of the transcripts which have appeared in the print media or in the electronic media and which are being circulated on the Internet.” The affidavit was silent on Mr. Tata's interim plea to stop further publication of the tapes. “There was no question of destruction of the records since the investigation in respect of the action points emanating from the conversations has not yet been completed by the IT department as well as other investigation agencies.” The Centre, however, reiterated that safety of the data in the electronic form was ensured through proper checks in the systems through which the recordings had taken place. Explaining the sequence of events, the affidavit said after the Home Ministry's approval, 14 telephone lines of Ms. Radia and her associates were put under surveillance, initially for 60 days from August 20 to October 19, 2008 and extended for another 60 days. From May 2009, her six telephone lines were put under surveillance for 60 days. Sensitive conversations In November 2009, the Director-General of Income Tax (Investigation) informed the Intelligence Bureau that an analysis of the intercepts would suggest that some of the conversations were quite sensitive and could indicate violation of the provisions of the IT Act by the parties concerned. In December 2009, the records of 1,450 calls containing about 100 hours of recording of the conversations were handed over to the CBI. The entire recordings consisting of about 5,800 calls were handed over to the CBI in May 2010. In November, the audio tapes and some of the transcripts were published in some magazines and put on some websites, the Centre said. “If it is established that any service provider was responsible for the unauthorised supply of the information, the Telecom Ministry or any other competent authority will have to take further action.” The case comes up for further hearing on December 13.
|