Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2223, 'title' => 'Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 21 June, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Redress-wronged-tribal-women-HC/articleshow/6072797.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2303, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2223, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,Gender,Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2223, 'title' => 'Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 21 June, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Redress-wronged-tribal-women-HC/articleshow/6072797.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2303, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2223 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,Gender,Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the "pitiable condition" of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to "take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were "based on hearsay", several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into "some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be "prima facie true". In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2223, 'title' => 'Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 21 June, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Redress-wronged-tribal-women-HC/articleshow/6072797.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2303, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2223, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,Gender,Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2223, 'title' => 'Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 21 June, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Redress-wronged-tribal-women-HC/articleshow/6072797.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2303, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2223 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,Gender,Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the "pitiable condition" of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to "take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were "based on hearsay", several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into "some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be "prima facie true". In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68055b9b79655-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68055b9b79655-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2223, 'title' => 'Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 21 June, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Redress-wronged-tribal-women-HC/articleshow/6072797.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2303, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2223, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,Gender,Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2223, 'title' => 'Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 21 June, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Redress-wronged-tribal-women-HC/articleshow/6072797.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2303, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2223 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,Gender,Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the &quot;pitiable condition&quot; of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to &quot;take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were &quot;based on hearsay&quot;, several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into &quot;some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police&quot;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be &quot;prima facie true&quot;. In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the "pitiable condition" of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to "take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were "based on hearsay", several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into "some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be "prima facie true". In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2223, 'title' => 'Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the "pitiable condition" of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to "take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy". </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were "based on hearsay", several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into "some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police". </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be "prima facie true". In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 21 June, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Redress-wronged-tribal-women-HC/articleshow/6072797.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2303, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2223, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,Gender,Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the "pitiable condition" of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to "take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were "based on hearsay", several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into "some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be "prima facie true". In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2223, 'title' => 'Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the "pitiable condition" of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to "take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy". </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were "based on hearsay", several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into "some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police". </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be "prima facie true". In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 21 June, 2010, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Redress-wronged-tribal-women-HC/articleshow/6072797.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'redress-wronged-tribal-women-hc-by-supriya-sharma-2303', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2303, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2223 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,Gender,Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >In recent years, Chhattisgarh police has been under a cloud for human rights violations in the conflict zone of Bastar. So far, the allegations have not been proved in a court of law, making it virtually impossible for victims to claim compensation. But on Friday, for the first time, the High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the state government to compensate the widows of three men allegedly killed by the police. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the "pitiable condition" of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to "take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were "based on hearsay", several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into "some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police". </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be "prima facie true". In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Redress wronged tribal women: HC by Supriya Sharma |
The women went to court in April 2008 alleging their husbands were killed by an assistant sub-inspector and two special police officers. Two years later, hearings in the case continue and the culpability of the police is yet to be established. But on Friday, the court took note of the "pitiable condition" of the tribal women. In an interim order, it asked the district collector to "take appropriate steps for extension of relief whatsoever is provided under state policy". The case relates to murders that took place in a Salwa Judum camp in Matwada in Bijapur in March 2008. Bijapur is the district that witnessed the maximum violence in clashes between Salwa Judum and Maoists during 2006-2008. Police records show an FIR filed on March 19, 2008, by Aayete Madkamee, stating that her husband Madda and two other men were picked up from the camp at night and killed by Maoists for attending Salwa Judum rallies. Aayete alleged that the FIR was not filed by her but concocted by the police. She said her husband and two others were killed not by Maoists but by ASI Ghanshyam Patel and a group of SPOs. Aayete filed a writ petition along with the widows of the other dead men, and Kudiyam Somdu, a man who survived the incident with three broken ribs and bullet injuries. The victims were helped by an NGO, Vanvasi Chetna Ashram, which is co-petitioner in this case as well as at least a dozen others, according to its lawyer Sourabh Dangi. Apart from the cases being heard by the high court, a writ petition was filed in 2007 in the Supreme Court by Delhi-based sociologist Nandini Sundar and others, alleging large-scale killings by Salwa Judum and the police. A team of the National Human Rights Commission travelled to Bastar in the summer of 2008 to investigate the allegations on behalf of the Supreme Court. It found many allegations were "based on hearsay", several others were unsubstantiated or unverifiable, but asked for an inquiry into "some instances of extra-judicial killings by the police". The Matwada murders is one of the cases where the NHRC team found the allegations to be "prima facie true". In its report, it questions the police version that Maoists killed the three men. It points out that the houses of the men were barely 30 metres from a police watch tower, and a CRPF sentry stayed on guard on the road leading to the camp. |