Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Express News Service
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points/886155/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11911,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill,lokpal,Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Express News Service


&amp;nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Express News Service&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Express News Service
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points/886155/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11911,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11793
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill,lokpal,Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Express News Service


&amp;nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Express News Service&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Express News Service


&nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Report shows panel split on most points</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-Express News Service</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.<br /><br />In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.<br /><br />Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &mdash; maintained that &ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo;.<br /><br />Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &ldquo;no reason or logic&rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.<br /><br />The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Express News Service
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points/886155/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11911,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill,lokpal,Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Express News Service


&amp;nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Express News Service&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Express News Service
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points/886155/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11911,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11793
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill,lokpal,Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Express News Service


&amp;nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Express News Service&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Express News Service


&nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Report shows panel split on most points</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-Express News Service</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.<br /><br />In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.<br /><br />Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &mdash; maintained that &ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo;.<br /><br />Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &ldquo;no reason or logic&rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.<br /><br />The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea60fbe848c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Express News Service
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points/886155/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11911,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill,lokpal,Corruption&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Express News Service


&amp;nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Express News Service&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11793,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Report shows panel split on most points&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Express News Service
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points/886155/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11911,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11793
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill,lokpal,Corruption&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Express News Service


&amp;nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Express News Service&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &amp;mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &amp;mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &amp;mdash; maintained that &amp;ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&amp;rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &amp;ldquo;sense of the House&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &amp;ldquo;no reason or logic&amp;rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&amp;rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Express News Service


&nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Report shows panel split on most points</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-Express News Service</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.<br /><br />In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.<br /><br />Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &mdash; maintained that &ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo;.<br /><br />Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &ldquo;no reason or logic&rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.<br /><br />The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 11793,
		'title' => 'Report shows panel split on most points',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p>
-Express News Service
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.<br />
<br />
In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.<br />
<br />
Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &mdash; maintained that &ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &ldquo;no reason or logic&rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.<br />
<br />
The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points/886155/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 11911,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 11793,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points',
	'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal,Corruption',
	'metaDesc' => '
-Express News Service


&nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position...',
	'disp' => '<p>-Express News Service</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.<br /><br />In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.<br /><br />Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &mdash; maintained that &ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo;.<br /><br />Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &ldquo;no reason or logic&rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.<br /><br />The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 11793,
	'title' => 'Report shows panel split on most points',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p>
-Express News Service
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.<br />
<br />
In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.<br />
<br />
Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &mdash; maintained that &ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &ldquo;no reason or logic&rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.<br />
<br />
The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 10 December, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points/886155/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'report-shows-panel-split-on-most-points-11911',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 11911,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 11793
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Report shows panel split on most points'
$metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
-Express News Service


&nbsp;


The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.

In fact, the position...'
$disp = '<p>-Express News Service</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent.<br /><br />In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points &mdash; they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report.<br /><br />Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members &mdash; Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda &mdash; maintained that &ldquo;all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered&rdquo; and this was in consonance with their view and the &ldquo;sense of the House&rdquo;.<br /><br />Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was &ldquo;no reason or logic&rdquo; for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP&rsquo;s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded.<br /><br />The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Report shows panel split on most points

-Express News Service   The report of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Lokpal Bill, which was tabled in Parliament Friday, obviously saw more divergence than convergence, with 17 of the 30 members recording their dissent. In fact, the position of the dissenting three Congress members, Meenakshi Natarajan, P T Thomas and Deepa Dasmunsi, was closer to the Opposition on three important points — they suggested that the Central Vigilance Commission be placed under the Lokpal and the state vigilance commissions under the Lokayukta, that investigations into corruption cases by the CBI be subjected to the control of Lokpal, and that Group C officers be brought under the jurisdiction of the Lokpal. Panel chief Abishek Singhvi has argued that a dissent note did not mean an MP was against the entire report. Apart from the three Congress members, 14 advocated inclusion of Group C employees under the Lokpal. The six BJP members — Kirti Azad, Harin Pathak, Arjun Ram Meghwal, Bal Apte, Madhusudan Yadav and D B Chandre Gowda — maintained that “all public servants holding civil posts in government should be covered” and this was in consonance with their view and the “sense of the House”. Vijay Bahadur Singh of the BSP stated in his note that there was “no reason or logic” for exempting Group C employees. A Sampath of the CPM too was in favour of inclusion of lower bureaucracy, while RSP’s Prasanta Majumdar said the common man experienced corruption when he came in contact with these officials. SP member Shailendra Kumar wondered at the utility of Lokpal if 95 per cent government employees were excluded. The six BJP MPs, Sampath, Majumdar and Pinaki Misra (BJD) also backed bringing the prime minister under the purview of Lokpal.