Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2351, 'title' => 'Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 July, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/07/01/stories/2010070165712600.htm ', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2435, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2351, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2351, 'title' => 'Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 July, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/07/01/stories/2010070165712600.htm ', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2435, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2351 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report — such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the “intermediary documents” are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of ‘Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, “It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,” the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2351, 'title' => 'Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 July, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/07/01/stories/2010070165712600.htm ', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2435, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2351, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2351, 'title' => 'Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 July, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/07/01/stories/2010070165712600.htm ', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2435, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2351 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report — such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the “intermediary documents” are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of ‘Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, “It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,” the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fea0f6b6ab-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2351, 'title' => 'Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 July, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/07/01/stories/2010070165712600.htm ', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2435, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2351, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2351, 'title' => 'Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 July, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/07/01/stories/2010070165712600.htm ', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2435, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2351 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report &mdash; such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the &ldquo;intermediary documents&rdquo; are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of &lsquo;Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, &ldquo;It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,&rdquo; the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report — such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the “intermediary documents” are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of ‘Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, “It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,” the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2351, 'title' => 'Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report — such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CPIOs had also contended that the “intermediary documents” are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of ‘Information' under the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, “It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,” the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 July, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/07/01/stories/2010070165712600.htm ', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2435, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2351, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report — such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the “intermediary documents” are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of ‘Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, “It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,” the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2351, 'title' => 'Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report — such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CPIOs had also contended that the “intermediary documents” are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of ‘Information' under the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, “It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,” the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 July, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/07/01/stories/2010070165712600.htm ', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'requests-of-information-acceded-by-cic-by-prakash-kamat-2435', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2435, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2351 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font >A full bench of the Central Information Commission headed by Chief Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah has recently held that while all proceedings before the Parliamentary Committees (PC) are no doubt held secret, it cannot be stretched to mean that every single item of information, held anywhere, that may, now or in future, become part of the proceedings before the PC, or may be required to be produced before the it, should also come under the exemption from disclosure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report — such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CPIOs had also contended that the “intermediary documents” are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of ‘Information' under the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, “It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,” the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House.</font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Requests of information acceded by CIC by Prakash Kamat |
This ruling came on June 10 in three second-appeals filed by appellants Manohar Parrikar, Goa Leader of the Opposition (BJP), Mr. Jayanta Kumar Routray, and Mr. Gurbax Singh against the orders of Appellate Authorities of the office of Accountants General of Goa, Orissa and Punjab, respectively. The above three second-appeals were bunched together and heard by a full bench comprising Central Information Commissioners A. N. Tiwari and Satyananda Mishra apart from Mr. Habibullah. They all had broadly similar requests for disclosure of information which went into the making of an Audit Report — such as audit observations, marginal notes, audit notes and audit memos, etc. Earlier A.N. Tiwari heard the initial submissions of the parties in the second appeal filed by Mr. Parrikar, and referred the case to be decided by a larger bench, observing that apart from the points brought up by the parties, there were other issues about parliamentary legislative privilege, that needed to be addressed. The requests for information were denied earlier as they raised issues within Sections 8(1)(c) of the Right To Information(RTI)Act, while the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General(CAG) was confidential. The CPIOs had also contended that the “intermediary documents” are merely working papers and may not come within the realm of ‘Information' under the RTI Act. But after seeking the assistance of the Secretary General of Lok Sabha P. D. T. Acharya over what constitutes a parliamentary privilege in this regard, the full bench ruled that the requests for information did not attract Section 8(1)(c) of the RTI Act. Quoting the Secretary General's observations in its order, “It is doubtful whether the report of the CAG qualifies to be treated as the report of Parliamentary Committee or [as evidence]. Half margins, draft audit notes, etc., do not have any relevance insofar as Parliamentary papers are concerned,” the full bench ruled that disclosure of audit notes, audit paras, marginal notes, etc., could not be said to constitute a breach of privilege of the House. |