Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680a143521a98-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680a143521a98-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680a143521a98-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 August, 2017, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682609,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Beef Consumption,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu


&amp;nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&amp;nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 August, 2017, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682609,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34504
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Beef Consumption,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu


&amp;nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&amp;nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu


&nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. <br /></em></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &ldquo;some bearing&rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.<br /><br />The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.<br /><br />A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.<br /><br />Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.<br /><br />The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&rsquo;s &ldquo;right to privacy&rdquo;.<br /><br />The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.<br /><br />The High Court had termed &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &ldquo;conscious possession&rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication" title="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680a143521a98-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680a143521a98-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680a143521a98-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 August, 2017, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682609,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Beef Consumption,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu


&amp;nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&amp;nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 August, 2017, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682609,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34504
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Beef Consumption,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu


&amp;nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&amp;nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu


&nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. <br /></em></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &ldquo;some bearing&rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.<br /><br />The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.<br /><br />A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.<br /><br />Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.<br /><br />The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&rsquo;s &ldquo;right to privacy&rdquo;.<br /><br />The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.<br /><br />The High Court had termed &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &ldquo;conscious possession&rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication" title="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680a143521a98-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a143521a98-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680a143521a98-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680a143521a98-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 August, 2017, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682609,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Beef Consumption,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu


&amp;nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&amp;nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34504,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 25 August, 2017, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682609,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34504
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Privacy,Privacy Rights,Beef Consumption,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu


&amp;nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&amp;nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &amp;ldquo;some bearing&amp;rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&amp;rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &amp;ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&amp;rdquo; the bench said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &amp;ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&amp;rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&amp;rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&amp;rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&amp;rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;right to privacy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The High Court had termed &amp;ldquo;unconstitutional&amp;rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &amp;ldquo;conscious possession&amp;rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu


&nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. <br /></em></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &ldquo;some bearing&rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.<br /><br />The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.<br /><br />A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.<br /><br />Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.<br /><br />The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&rsquo;s &ldquo;right to privacy&rdquo;.<br /><br />The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.<br /><br />The High Court had termed &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &ldquo;conscious possession&rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication" title="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 34504,
		'title' => 'Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu<br />
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>
<div align="justify">
<em>A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. <br />
</em>
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>
<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &ldquo;some bearing&rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.<br />
<br />
A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.<br />
<br />
The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&rsquo;s &ldquo;right to privacy&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.<br />
<br />
The High Court had termed &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &ldquo;conscious possession&rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 August, 2017, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4682609,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 34504,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Privacy,Privacy Rights,Beef Consumption,Supreme Court',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu


&nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. <br /></em></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &ldquo;some bearing&rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.<br /><br />The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.<br /><br />A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.<br /><br />Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.<br /><br />The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&rsquo;s &ldquo;right to privacy&rdquo;.<br /><br />The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.<br /><br />The High Court had termed &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &ldquo;conscious possession&rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication" title="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 34504,
	'title' => 'Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu<br />
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>
<div align="justify">
<em>A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. <br />
</em>
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>
<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &ldquo;some bearing&rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.<br />
<br />
The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.<br />
<br />
A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.<br />
<br />
Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.<br />
<br />
The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&rsquo;s &ldquo;right to privacy&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.<br />
<br />
The High Court had termed &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &ldquo;conscious possession&rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication">click here</a> to read more. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 25 August, 2017, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench-4682609',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4682609,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 34504
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench'
$metaKeywords = 'Privacy,Privacy Rights,Beef Consumption,Supreme Court'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu


&nbsp;


A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. 



&nbsp;


The Supreme Court on August...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy. <br /></em></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have &ldquo;some bearing&rdquo; in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra.<br /><br />The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court&rsquo;s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State.<br /><br />A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. &ldquo;Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said &ldquo;nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress&rdquo; while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy.<br /><br />Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one&rsquo;s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government&rsquo;s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks.<br /><br />The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court&rsquo;s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person&rsquo;s &ldquo;right to privacy&rdquo;.<br /><br />The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue.<br /><br />The High Court had termed &ldquo;unconstitutional&rdquo; the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only &ldquo;conscious possession&rdquo; of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication" title="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/right-to-privacy-verdict-to-have-some-bearing-in-beef-matters-says-supreme-court-bench/article19559621.ece?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Right to privacy verdict to have some bearing in beef matters, says Supreme Court bench

-The Hindu   A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has said that “nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress” while ruling that these activities come under the realm of privacy.   The Supreme Court on August 25, 2017 said its verdict declaring right to privacy a fundamental right would have “some bearing” in matters related to the possession of beef in Maharashtra. The apex court made the observation while hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Bombay High Court’s May 6, 2016 verdict decriminalising the possession of beef in case of animals slaughtered outside the State. A bench comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan was informed by an advocate that the August 24, 2017 judgement from a nine-judge Constitution bench, declaring right to privacy a fundamental right, was important for adjudication of the appeal. “Yes, that judgement will have some bearing in these matters,” the bench said. The Supreme Court on August 24, 2017 said “nobody would like to be told what to eat or how to dress” while ruling that these activities come under the realm of the right to privacy. Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for some of the petitioners, referred to the privacy judgement and said the right to eat food of one’s choice is now protected under privacy. She also told the bench that Maharashtra government’s appeal challenging the High Court verdict was already pending before another bench of the apex court. The bench, after hearing the submissions, posted the matter after two weeks. The Maharashtra government on August 10, 2017 moved the apex court challenging the High Court’s verdict striking down sections 5(d) and 9(b) of the Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act, 1995, which criminalised and imposed punishment on persons found in possession of beef of animals, slaughtered in or outside the State, on the ground that it infringed upon a person’s “right to privacy”. The court had issued notice on the appeal and tagged the matter along with several pending pleas related to the issue. The High Court had termed “unconstitutional” the provisions which held that mere possession of beef was a crime, saying only “conscious possession” of the meat of animals slaughtered in the State would be an offence. Please click here to read more.