Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10063, 'title' => 'Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /> <br /> The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /> <br /> Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /> <br /> Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /> <br /> Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /> <br /> Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110922/jsp/nation/story_14538665.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10172, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10063, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Food Security,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;. Congress leaders believe...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /><br />Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10063, 'title' => 'Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /> <br /> The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /> <br /> Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /> <br /> Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /> <br /> Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /> <br /> Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110922/jsp/nation/story_14538665.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10172, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10063 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Food Security,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;. Congress leaders believe...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /><br />Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”. Congress leaders believe..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a “cruel joke” in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: “These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.”<br /><br />Ally NCP didn’t agree. “Don’t insult the poor if you can’t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,” spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no “political consultations” were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. “This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla’s celebrated novel Ragdarbari — planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).”<br /><br />Asked about the NCP’s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. “Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,” he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission’s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent — 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person’s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel’s move to defend its new definition reflected the government’s lack of empathy for the poor. “This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,” Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was “barely enough to buy an aspirin”.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as “shocking”. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won’t be sufficient even for food. “A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?” he asked.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10063, 'title' => 'Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /> <br /> The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /> <br /> Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /> <br /> Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /> <br /> Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /> <br /> Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110922/jsp/nation/story_14538665.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10172, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10063, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Food Security,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;. Congress leaders believe...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /><br />Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10063, 'title' => 'Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /> <br /> The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /> <br /> Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /> <br /> Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /> <br /> Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /> <br /> Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110922/jsp/nation/story_14538665.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10172, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10063 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Food Security,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;. Congress leaders believe...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /><br />Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”. Congress leaders believe..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a “cruel joke” in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: “These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.”<br /><br />Ally NCP didn’t agree. “Don’t insult the poor if you can’t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,” spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no “political consultations” were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. “This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla’s celebrated novel Ragdarbari — planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).”<br /><br />Asked about the NCP’s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. “Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,” he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission’s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent — 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person’s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel’s move to defend its new definition reflected the government’s lack of empathy for the poor. “This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,” Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was “barely enough to buy an aspirin”.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as “shocking”. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won’t be sufficient even for food. “A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?” he asked.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804556bcb245-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804556bcb245-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10063, 'title' => 'Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /> <br /> The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /> <br /> Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /> <br /> Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /> <br /> Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /> <br /> Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110922/jsp/nation/story_14538665.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10172, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10063, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Food Security,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;. Congress leaders believe...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /><br />Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10063, 'title' => 'Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /> <br /> The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /> <br /> Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /> <br /> Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /> <br /> Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /> <br /> Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110922/jsp/nation/story_14538665.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10172, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10063 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Food Security,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;. Congress leaders believe...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an &ldquo;insult to the poor&rdquo;.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a &ldquo;cruel joke&rdquo; in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: &ldquo;These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.&rdquo;<br /><br />Ally NCP didn&rsquo;t agree. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t insult the poor if you can&rsquo;t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,&rdquo; spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no &ldquo;political consultations&rdquo; were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. &ldquo;This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla&rsquo;s celebrated novel Ragdarbari &mdash; planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the NCP&rsquo;s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. &ldquo;Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission&rsquo;s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent &mdash; 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person&rsquo;s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel&rsquo;s move to defend its new definition reflected the government&rsquo;s lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was &ldquo;barely enough to buy an aspirin&rdquo;.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as &ldquo;shocking&rdquo;. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won&rsquo;t be sufficient even for food. &ldquo;A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?&rdquo; he asked.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”. Congress leaders believe..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a “cruel joke” in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: “These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.”<br /><br />Ally NCP didn’t agree. “Don’t insult the poor if you can’t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,” spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no “political consultations” were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. “This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla’s celebrated novel Ragdarbari — planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).”<br /><br />Asked about the NCP’s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. “Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,” he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission’s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent — 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person’s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel’s move to defend its new definition reflected the government’s lack of empathy for the poor. “This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,” Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was “barely enough to buy an aspirin”.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as “shocking”. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won’t be sufficient even for food. “A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?” he asked.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10063, 'title' => 'Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”.<br /> <br /> Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a “cruel joke” in the season of scams.<br /> <br /> The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: “These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.”<br /> <br /> Ally NCP didn’t agree. “Don’t insult the poor if you can’t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,” spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no “political consultations” were held before arriving at the figures.<br /> <br /> Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. “This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla’s celebrated novel Ragdarbari — planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).”<br /> <br /> Asked about the NCP’s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. “Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,” he said.<br /> <br /> The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission’s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent — 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person’s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /> <br /> Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /> <br /> Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel’s move to defend its new definition reflected the government’s lack of empathy for the poor. “This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,” Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /> <br /> Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was “barely enough to buy an aspirin”.<br /> <br /> Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as “shocking”. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won’t be sufficient even for food. “A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?” he asked.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110922/jsp/nation/story_14538665.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10172, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10063, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl,Food Security,Right to Food', 'metaDesc' => ' The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”. Congress leaders believe...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a “cruel joke” in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: “These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.”<br /><br />Ally NCP didn’t agree. “Don’t insult the poor if you can’t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,” spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no “political consultations” were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. “This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla’s celebrated novel Ragdarbari — planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).”<br /><br />Asked about the NCP’s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. “Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,” he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission’s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent — 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person’s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel’s move to defend its new definition reflected the government’s lack of empathy for the poor. “This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,” Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was “barely enough to buy an aspirin”.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as “shocking”. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won’t be sufficient even for food. “A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?” he asked.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10063, 'title' => 'Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”.<br /> <br /> Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a “cruel joke” in the season of scams.<br /> <br /> The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: “These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.”<br /> <br /> Ally NCP didn’t agree. “Don’t insult the poor if you can’t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,” spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no “political consultations” were held before arriving at the figures.<br /> <br /> Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. “This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla’s celebrated novel Ragdarbari — planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).”<br /> <br /> Asked about the NCP’s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. “Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,” he said.<br /> <br /> The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission’s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent — 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person’s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /> <br /> Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /> <br /> Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel’s move to defend its new definition reflected the government’s lack of empathy for the poor. “This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,” Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /> <br /> Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was “barely enough to buy an aspirin”.<br /> <br /> Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as “shocking”. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won’t be sufficient even for food. “A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?” he asked.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110922/jsp/nation/story_14538665.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'row-over-poverty-line-by-sanjay-k-jha-and-basant-kumar-mohanty-10172', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10172, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10063 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl,Food Security,Right to Food' $metaDesc = ' The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”. Congress leaders believe...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”.<br /><br />Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a “cruel joke” in the season of scams.<br /><br />The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: “These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.”<br /><br />Ally NCP didn’t agree. “Don’t insult the poor if you can’t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,” spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no “political consultations” were held before arriving at the figures.<br /><br />Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. “This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla’s celebrated novel Ragdarbari — planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).”<br /><br />Asked about the NCP’s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. “Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,” he said.<br /><br />The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission’s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent — 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person’s expenditure on food, education and health.<br /><br />Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578.<br /><br />Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel’s move to defend its new definition reflected the government’s lack of empathy for the poor. “This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,” Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday.<br /><br />Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was “barely enough to buy an aspirin”.<br /><br />Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as “shocking”. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won’t be sufficient even for food. “A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?” he asked.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Row over poverty line by Sanjay K Jha and Basant Kumar Mohanty |
The Planning Commission’s new definition of poverty widely criticised as being unrealistic has caused disquiet in the UPA, with Congress leaders privately dubbing the benchmarks insensitive and ally NCP publicly slamming them as an “insult to the poor”.
Congress leaders believe the figures, under which anyone spending more than Rs 32 a day in urban areas and Rs 26 in villages will not be considered poor and hence will not be eligible for several welfare schemes, suggested lack of sincerity in assessing the true plight of the indigent. Many in the party were angry and said the Planning Commission could have avoided cracking such a “cruel joke” in the season of scams. The Congress chose not to express its unease publicly, even though the plan panel defended its new norms in the Supreme Court yesterday. Spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said: “These matters are decided on the basis of empirical data and should be left to the experts.” Ally NCP didn’t agree. “Don’t insult the poor if you can’t mitigate their plight. This (new definition) is insensitive to say the least. Any sensible person will feel angry,” spokesperson D.P. Tripathi said, claiming no “political consultations” were held before arriving at the figures. Tripathi was quick to cite a line by writer Shrilal Shukla, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith award only yesterday, to take a swipe at the plan panel. “This (the poverty definition) reminds me one famous line in Shrilal Shukla’s celebrated novel Ragdarbari — planning ke teen kam/meeting, lunch aur aaram (planning has three ingredients/meeting, lunch and rest).” Asked about the NCP’s criticism, Congress spokesperson Singhvi sought to play down the apparent differences of opinion. “Making casual remarks will not help. There can be genuine differences but the Planning Commission is the right forum to analyse the inputs,” he said. The Tendulkar Committee report, which is the basis of the Planning Commission’s new definition, has pegged the BPL numbers at 37.2 per cent — 26 per cent in urban areas and 42 per cent in villages. The committee considered factors like a person’s expenditure on food, education and health. Based on such expenses at 2011 price levels, those spending Rs 781 per month in rural areas and Rs 965 in urban areas will be deemed poor, the plan panel has told the apex court. At 2004-05 prices, which the Tendulkar committee used, the corresponding monthly figures will be Rs 447 in rural and Rs 578. Experts have panned the figures. Aruna Roy, a member of the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), said the plan panel’s move to defend its new definition reflected the government’s lack of empathy for the poor. “This is aimed only at artificially reducing the number of persons below the poverty line to reduce government expenditure on the poor,” Roy, one of those who conceived rural job scheme, said yesterday. Former NAC member Jean Dreze said the health expenditure estimated by the Tendulkar panel was “barely enough to buy an aspirin”. Food rights activist Colin Gonsalves described the definition as “shocking”. The per capita expenditure of Rs 32 per day in cities won’t be sufficient even for food. “A person cannot feed himself properly with this money. Where from he will spend on clothing, health and other things?” he asked. |