Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4780, 'title' => 'Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article953099.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4871, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4780, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption', 'metaDesc' => 'Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4780, 'title' => 'Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article953099.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4871, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4780 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption' $metaDesc = 'Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: “This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. “Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 — where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted — that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: “We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: “The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: “The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4780, 'title' => 'Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article953099.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4871, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4780, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption', 'metaDesc' => 'Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4780, 'title' => 'Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article953099.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4871, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4780 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption' $metaDesc = 'Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: “This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. “Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 — where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted — that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: “We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: “The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: “The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6816b07dcecbd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4780, 'title' => 'Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article953099.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4871, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4780, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption', 'metaDesc' => 'Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4780, 'title' => 'Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article953099.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4871, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4780 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption' $metaDesc = 'Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench &lsquo;Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. &ldquo;Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 &mdash; where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted &mdash; that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: &ldquo;We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: &ldquo;The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: “This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. “Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 — where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted — that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: “We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: “The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: “The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4780, 'title' => 'Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: “This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. “Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 — where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted — that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: “We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: “The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: “The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article953099.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4871, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4780, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption', 'metaDesc' => 'Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: “This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. “Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 — where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted — that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: “We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: “The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: “The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4780, 'title' => 'Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: “This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. “Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 — where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted — that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: “We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: “The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: “The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 15 December, 2010, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article953099.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-10-lakh-exemplary-costs-imposed-on-maharashtra-by-j-venkatesan-4871', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4871, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4780 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption' $metaDesc = 'Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister),...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence'</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: “This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. “Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 — where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted — that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Ganguly said: “We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: “The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Singhvi said: “The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Rs. 10 lakh exemplary costs imposed on Maharashtra by J Venkatesan |
Deshmukh protected Congress MLA's family member from normal process of law: Bench ‘Cases involving misuse of public office for private gains shake people's confidence' Taking serious view of the former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh (currently the Union Industries Minister), interfering in a criminal investigation against a family of a Congress MLA, the Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed an exemplary cost of Rs.10 lakh on the Maharashtra government. A Bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly, in separate but concurring judgments, held that Mr. Deshmukh, as the then Chief Minister and holding a position of great responsibility as a high constitutional functionary, had acted beyond all legal norms by giving directions to the District Collector to protect members of a particular family dealing in money-lending business from the normal process of law. In his judgment, Justice Ganguly said: “This amounts to bestowing special favour to some chosen few at the cost of the vast number of poor people who as farmers have taken loans and who have come to the authorities of law and order to register their complaints against torture and atrocities by the money lenders. The instructions of the Chief Minister will certainly impede their access to legal redress and bring about a failure of the due process.” Justice Ganguly pointed out that it was clear from the communication of the Collector, which contained the Chief Minister's instructions, that Mr. Deshmukh was aware of the complaints being filed against the said family. “Even then he [Mr. Deshmukh] passed an order for a special treatment in favour of the said family, which is unknown to law.” The Bench was dismissing an appeal filed by Maharashtra against a judgment of the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court imposing Rs.25,000 costs on a petition by a group of farmers alleging that the police refused to register a criminal case against Congress legislator Dilipkumar Sananda's father Gokulchand Sananda, a private money-lender. Justice Ganguly said Mr. Deshmukh wanted to give the members of the said family special protection which was not available to other similarly placed persons. It is clear from the Collector's order dated June 5, 2006 — where the Chief Minister's instructions were quoted — that Mr. Deshmukh was acting solely on political consideration to screen the family of the MLA from the normal process of law. Justice Ganguly said: “We cannot shut our eyes to the stark realities. It is clear that close to two lakh farmers committed suicide in India between 1997 and 2008. Even though Maharashtra is one of the richest States in the country, and in its capital Mumbai, 25,000 of India's $1 lakh millionaires reside, the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra is the worst place in the country for farmers.” In his judgment, Justice Singhvi said: “The cases involving pervasive misuse of public office for private gains, which have come to light in last few decades, tend to shake the people's confidence, and one is constrained to think that India has freed itself from British colonialism only to come in the grip of a new class, which tries to rule on the same colonial principles.” Justice Singhvi said: “The camouflage of sophistry used by Mr. Vilasrao Deshmukh in the instructions given by him and the affidavit filed by him before this court is clearly misleading. The message to the authorities was loud and clear, i.e., they were not to take the complaints against the Sananda family seriously and not to proceed against them.” The Bench held that the instructions were ultra vires the provisions of the relevant Act and dismissed the appeal.
|