Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27729, 'title' => 'Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. </p> <p align="justify"> Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p> <p align="justify"> In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. </p> <p align="justify"> The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. </p> <p align="justify"> If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. </p> <p align="justify"> The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. </p> <p align="justify"> The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. </p> <p align="justify"> The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. </p> <p align="justify"> As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675780, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27729, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,NREGA,Employment,Wages,Livelihood', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27729, 'title' => 'Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. </p> <p align="justify"> Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p> <p align="justify"> In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. </p> <p align="justify"> The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. </p> <p align="justify"> If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. </p> <p align="justify"> The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. </p> <p align="justify"> The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. </p> <p align="justify"> The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. </p> <p align="justify"> As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675780, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27729 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,NREGA,Employment,Wages,Livelihood' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the "Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27729, 'title' => 'Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. </p> <p align="justify"> Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p> <p align="justify"> In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. </p> <p align="justify"> The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. </p> <p align="justify"> If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. </p> <p align="justify"> The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. </p> <p align="justify"> The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. </p> <p align="justify"> The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. </p> <p align="justify"> As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675780, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27729, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,NREGA,Employment,Wages,Livelihood', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27729, 'title' => 'Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. </p> <p align="justify"> Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p> <p align="justify"> In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. </p> <p align="justify"> The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. </p> <p align="justify"> If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. </p> <p align="justify"> The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. </p> <p align="justify"> The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. </p> <p align="justify"> The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. </p> <p align="justify"> As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675780, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27729 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,NREGA,Employment,Wages,Livelihood' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the "Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680739cdd2e13-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27729, 'title' => 'Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. </p> <p align="justify"> Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p> <p align="justify"> In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. </p> <p align="justify"> The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. </p> <p align="justify"> If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. </p> <p align="justify"> The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. </p> <p align="justify"> The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. </p> <p align="justify"> The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. </p> <p align="justify"> As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675780, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27729, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,NREGA,Employment,Wages,Livelihood', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27729, 'title' => 'Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. </p> <p align="justify"> Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p> <p align="justify"> In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. </p> <p align="justify"> The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. </p> <p align="justify"> If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. </p> <p align="justify"> The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. </p> <p align="justify"> The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. </p> <p align="justify"> The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. </p> <p align="justify"> As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675780, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27729 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,NREGA,Employment,Wages,Livelihood' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the &quot;Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour&quot; with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the "Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27729, 'title' => 'Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. </p> <p align="justify"> Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p> <p align="justify"> In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. </p> <p align="justify"> The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. </p> <p align="justify"> If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the "Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. </p> <p align="justify"> The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. </p> <p align="justify"> The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. </p> <p align="justify"> The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. </p> <p align="justify"> As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675780, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27729, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,NREGA,Employment,Wages,Livelihood', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the "Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27729, 'title' => 'Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. </p> <p align="justify"> Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p> <p align="justify"> In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. </p> <p align="justify"> The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. </p> <p align="justify"> If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the "Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. </p> <p align="justify"> The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. </p> <p align="justify"> The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. </p> <p align="justify"> The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. </p> <p align="justify"> As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 7 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rs-2-to-rs-17-rise-in-nregs-wages-is-no-hike-at-all-subodh-ghildiyal-4675780', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675780, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27729 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,NREGA,Employment,Wages,Livelihood' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%.</p><p align="justify">Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. </p><p align="justify">In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15.</p><p align="justify">The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.</p><p align="justify">If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the "Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year.</p><p align="justify">The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour.</p><p align="justify">The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.</p><p align="justify">The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government.</p><p align="justify">As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at all -Subodh Ghildiyal |
-The Times of India New Delhi: Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges between 2%-10%. Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159 in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162. In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs 17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is Rs 15. The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs 11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump of Rs 10 over the last year's figure. If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say the blame rests not on government but on the "Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The Centre, through the rural development ministry, is bound to order a revision based on increase in farm labour in a particular state during the year. The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to each interested rural household, with the work mostly consisting of hard labour. The wage revision this year does not even appear to cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to. The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had erupted three years ago when the gain made by some backward states was as low as Re one. While the states had complained, they could not carp about much because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states, though for labour bureau under the Central government. As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5, Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13. |