Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 870,
'title' => '“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 6 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/06/stories/2010010659961000.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 944,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 870,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'metaKeywords' => null,
'metaDesc' => '
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed...',
'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 870,
'title' => '“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 6 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/06/stories/2010010659961000.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 944,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 870
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order”'
$metaKeywords = null
$metaDesc = '
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed...'
$disp = '<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order” | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: “RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.” After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 870,
'title' => '“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 6 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/06/stories/2010010659961000.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 944,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 870,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'metaKeywords' => null,
'metaDesc' => '
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed...',
'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 870,
'title' => '“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 6 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/06/stories/2010010659961000.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 944,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 870
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order”'
$metaKeywords = null
$metaDesc = '
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed...'
$disp = '<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order” | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: “RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.” After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680a5ec519c14-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 870,
'title' => '“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 6 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/06/stories/2010010659961000.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 944,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 870,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'metaKeywords' => null,
'metaDesc' => '
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed...',
'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 870,
'title' => '“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 6 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/06/stories/2010010659961000.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 944,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 870
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order”'
$metaKeywords = null
$metaDesc = '
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed...'
$disp = '<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: &ldquo;RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.&rdquo; After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order” | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: “RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.” After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 870,
'title' => '“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI said: “RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.”</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.” After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 6 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/06/stories/2010010659961000.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 944,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 870,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'metaKeywords' => null,
'metaDesc' => '
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed...',
'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: “RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.” After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 870,
'title' => '“RTI Act can’t question judicial order”',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI said: “RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.”</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.” After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 6 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/06/stories/2010010659961000.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'rti-act-cant-question-judicial-order-944',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 944,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 870
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | “RTI Act can’t question judicial order”'
$metaKeywords = null
$metaDesc = '
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed...'
$disp = '<p align="justify"><font >The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI said: “RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.” After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order. </font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
The Supreme Court on Monday held that the Right to Information Act cannot be used by a litigant to question the basis or correctness of a judicial order.
A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice B.S. Chauhan dismissed a special leave petition filed by a litigant Khanapuram Gandaiah against a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejecting the plea for giving reasons for the judicial order under the RTI Act. The Bench said the RTI application amounted to contempt of court.
The CJI said: “RTI cannot be used against a judge to explain a judgment. A judge speaks through his judgments and he is not answerable to anyone as to why he wrote a judgment in a particular manner. As the judge has given his views in the judgment, he cannot give any other reason for his judgment. No party has a right to ask the judge concerned through RTI about the judgment.”
The petitioner, by an RTI application, asked a district judge to explain an order in a land dispute. He wanted to know why the judge did not consider his submissions and sought reasons and the basis for the order.” After his application was rejected, he moved the Andhra Pradesh High Court against that order.
The High Court rejected his petition and the present appeal is directed against this order.
