Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21263, 'title' => 'RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. </p> <p align="justify"> Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. </p> <p align="justify"> The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. </p> <p align="justify"> Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. </p> <p align="justify"> Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. </p> <p align="justify"> On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' </p> <p align="justify"> CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 5 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RTI-Act-Congress-leads-parties-charge-against-transparency/articleshow/20434730.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21409, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21263, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'metaKeywords' => 'Political Parties,Right to Information,transparency,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21263, 'title' => 'RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. </p> <p align="justify"> Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. </p> <p align="justify"> The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. </p> <p align="justify"> Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. </p> <p align="justify"> Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. </p> <p align="justify"> On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' </p> <p align="justify"> CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 5 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RTI-Act-Congress-leads-parties-charge-against-transparency/articleshow/20434730.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21409, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21263 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency' $metaKeywords = 'Political Parties,Right to Information,transparency,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to "undermine" a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, "It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, "This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly."</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an "adventurist" approach that will harm democratic institutions. "It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, "Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">"The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly," Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing "astonishment and shock", JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was "no way justified" as "political parties are not shops". Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it "cannot accept" the CIC order as "opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, "This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy," adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, "We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law."</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, "If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21263, 'title' => 'RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. </p> <p align="justify"> Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. </p> <p align="justify"> The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. </p> <p align="justify"> Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. </p> <p align="justify"> Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. </p> <p align="justify"> On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' </p> <p align="justify"> CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 5 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RTI-Act-Congress-leads-parties-charge-against-transparency/articleshow/20434730.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21409, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21263, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'metaKeywords' => 'Political Parties,Right to Information,transparency,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21263, 'title' => 'RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. </p> <p align="justify"> Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. </p> <p align="justify"> The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. </p> <p align="justify"> Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. </p> <p align="justify"> Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. </p> <p align="justify"> On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' </p> <p align="justify"> CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 5 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RTI-Act-Congress-leads-parties-charge-against-transparency/articleshow/20434730.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21409, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21263 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency' $metaKeywords = 'Political Parties,Right to Information,transparency,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to "undermine" a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, "It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, "This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly."</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an "adventurist" approach that will harm democratic institutions. "It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, "Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">"The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly," Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing "astonishment and shock", JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was "no way justified" as "political parties are not shops". Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it "cannot accept" the CIC order as "opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, "This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy," adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, "We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law."</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, "If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680097fb0391e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680097fb0391e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21263, 'title' => 'RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. </p> <p align="justify"> Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. </p> <p align="justify"> The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. </p> <p align="justify"> Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. </p> <p align="justify"> Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. </p> <p align="justify"> On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' </p> <p align="justify"> CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 5 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RTI-Act-Congress-leads-parties-charge-against-transparency/articleshow/20434730.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21409, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21263, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'metaKeywords' => 'Political Parties,Right to Information,transparency,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21263, 'title' => 'RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. </p> <p align="justify"> Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. </p> <p align="justify"> The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. </p> <p align="justify"> Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. </p> <p align="justify"> Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. </p> <p align="justify"> On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' </p> <p align="justify"> CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 5 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RTI-Act-Congress-leads-parties-charge-against-transparency/articleshow/20434730.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21409, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21263 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties&#039; charge against transparency' $metaKeywords = 'Political Parties,Right to Information,transparency,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to &quot;undermine&quot; a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, &quot;It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, &quot;This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an &quot;adventurist&quot; approach that will harm democratic institutions. &quot;It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, &quot;Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly,&quot; Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing &quot;astonishment and shock&quot;, JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was &quot;no way justified&quot; as &quot;political parties are not shops&quot;. Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it &quot;cannot accept&quot; the CIC order as &quot;opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, &quot;This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy,&quot; adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, &quot;We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, &quot;If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to "undermine" a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, "It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, "This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly."</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an "adventurist" approach that will harm democratic institutions. "It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, "Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">"The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly," Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing "astonishment and shock", JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was "no way justified" as "political parties are not shops". Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it "cannot accept" the CIC order as "opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, "This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy," adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, "We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law."</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, "If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21263, 'title' => 'RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. </p> <p align="justify"> Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to "undermine" a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. </p> <p align="justify"> The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, "It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, "This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly." </p> <p align="justify"> Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an "adventurist" approach that will harm democratic institutions. "It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, "Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. </p> <p align="justify"> "The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly," Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. </p> <p align="justify"> Expressing "astonishment and shock", JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was "no way justified" as "political parties are not shops". Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. </p> <p align="justify"> Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it "cannot accept" the CIC order as "opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, "This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy," adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. </p> <p align="justify"> On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, "We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law." </p> <p align="justify"> Dasgupta said, "If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' </p> <p align="justify"> CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 5 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RTI-Act-Congress-leads-parties-charge-against-transparency/articleshow/20434730.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21409, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21263, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency', 'metaKeywords' => 'Political Parties,Right to Information,transparency,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to "undermine" a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, "It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, "This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly."</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an "adventurist" approach that will harm democratic institutions. "It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, "Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">"The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly," Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing "astonishment and shock", JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was "no way justified" as "political parties are not shops". Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it "cannot accept" the CIC order as "opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, "This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy," adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, "We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law."</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, "If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21263, 'title' => 'RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. </p> <p align="justify"> Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to "undermine" a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. </p> <p align="justify"> The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, "It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, "This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly." </p> <p align="justify"> Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an "adventurist" approach that will harm democratic institutions. "It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, "Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. </p> <p align="justify"> "The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly," Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. </p> <p align="justify"> Expressing "astonishment and shock", JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was "no way justified" as "political parties are not shops". Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. </p> <p align="justify"> Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it "cannot accept" the CIC order as "opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, "This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy," adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. </p> <p align="justify"> On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, "We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law." </p> <p align="justify"> Dasgupta said, "If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' </p> <p align="justify"> CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 5 June, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/RTI-Act-Congress-leads-parties-charge-against-transparency/articleshow/20434730.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-congress-leads-parties039-charge-against-transparency-21409', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 21409, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21263 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency' $metaKeywords = 'Political Parties,Right to Information,transparency,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations. Barring CPI,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Unease among political parties over being brought under the purview of the RTI Act became evident on Tuesday with Congress strongly opposed the Central Information Commission (CIC) order and BJP also expressing its reservations.</p><p align="justify">Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to "undermine" a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling.</p><p align="justify">The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, "It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, "This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly."</p><p align="justify">Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an "adventurist" approach that will harm democratic institutions. "It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said.</p><p align="justify">Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, "Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable.</p><p align="justify">"The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly," Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions.</p><p align="justify">Expressing "astonishment and shock", JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was "no way justified" as "political parties are not shops". Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order.</p><p align="justify">Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it "cannot accept" the CIC order as "opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, "This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy," adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members.</p><p align="justify">On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, "We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law."</p><p align="justify">Dasgupta said, "If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.''</p><p align="justify">CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
RTI Act: Congress leads parties' charge against transparency |
-The Times of India
Barring CPI, no political party welcomed the decision. CPM said it cannot accept the CIC order as it felt opponents can use the ruling to "undermine" a political party. Janata Dal (U) also opposed the ruling. The most forthright criticism of the CIC order came from finance minister P Chidambaram who said, "It is an unusual interpretation of the Act and not based on credible argument.'' Information and broadcasting minister Manish Tewari said, "This is a very curious attempt to try and stretch the scope of the act. The legislative attempt was clear that government authorities should come under the act. If political parties were to come under the act, it would have been stated explicitly." Congress general secretary Janardan Dwivedi termed the CIC order as an "adventurist" approach that will harm democratic institutions. "It is not acceptable. We totally disagree with it. Such an adventurist approach will create lot of harm and damage to democratic institutions. We simply cannot accept it,'' he said. Leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said, "Because of the public character of political parties there is nothing wrong in making their funding public.'' But he added that other entities like NGOs or even private enterprises that have received concessions from the government should be made similarly accountable. "The order needs to be studied and debated. There should not exceptions and the law's provisions must be applied uniformly," Jaitley said, indicating that he felt political parties should not be singled out under RTI provisions. Expressing "astonishment and shock", JD U) leader Sharad Yadav said the order was "no way justified" as "political parties are not shops". Asserting JD(U) is against the move, Yadav said he wanted the central government to seek annulment of the order. Left parties are split in their reaction to the order with CPI welcoming the move and CPM opposing it. CPM in a statement, said it "cannot accept" the CIC order as "opponents of a political party can use the order to destabilize the party.'' The party said, "This decision is based on a fundamental misconception about the role of political parties in a parliamentary democracy," adding that CPM is not funded by the government and is accountable only to its members. On the other hand, CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta welcomed the CIC decision, saying, "We welcome it. We want RTI to be extended to political parties because political parties are a part of the political establishment of the country. We will not challenge it in the court of law." Dasgupta said, "If we want government to be transparent then political parties who often run the government should themselves be transparent and accountable. The grip of the black money on the political system is increasing, so people have a right to know from where political parties are getting their funds and building their properties.'' CIC held six national parties - Congress, BJP, NCP, CPI-M, CPI and BSP - have been substantially funded indirectly by the central government and they have the character of public authority under the RTI Act as they perform public functions. |