Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15589, 'title' => 'RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 17 June, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/RTI-Act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report/Article1-873967.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15716, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15589, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15589, 'title' => 'RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 17 June, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/RTI-Act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report/Article1-873967.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15716, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15589 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?" the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules..." said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15589, 'title' => 'RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 17 June, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/RTI-Act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report/Article1-873967.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15716, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15589, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15589, 'title' => 'RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 17 June, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/RTI-Act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report/Article1-873967.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15716, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15589 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?" the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules..." said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680507f908e1a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680507f908e1a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15589, 'title' => 'RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 17 June, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/RTI-Act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report/Article1-873967.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15716, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15589, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15589, 'title' => 'RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 17 June, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/RTI-Act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report/Article1-873967.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15716, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15589 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that &nbsp;make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?&quot; the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules...&quot; said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?" the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules..." said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15589, 'title' => 'RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?" the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules..." said the study. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 17 June, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/RTI-Act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report/Article1-873967.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15716, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15589, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?" the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules..." said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15589, 'title' => 'RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?" the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules..." said the study. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 17 June, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/RTI-Act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report/Article1-873967.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rti-act-hit-by-judicial-obstacles-says-report-chetan-chauhan-15716', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15716, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15589 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify">The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?" the institute asked in the report submitted to the government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules..." said the study.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
RTI Act hit by judicial obstacles, says report-Chetan Chauhan |
-The Hindustan Times Though the high courts in the country are supposed to deliver justice in Right To Information (RTI) cases, they are the very institutions that make implementation of the law difficult, a study by a government institute has found. The study conducted by the Yashwantrao Chavan Academy of Development Administration, which evaluates the efficacy of the transparency law, finds that many high courts have prescribed rules for RTI in violation of the parent Act. The study also brought out some startling facts, such as high courts failing to rectify typographical errors while copying rules of other high courts, and imposing restrictions in addition to the eight already existing in the parent law. "The question is, can the competent authority, while exercising its rule-making power, frame rules contradictory to the substantive provisions of the Act?" the institute asked in the report submitted to the government. Through their rulings, a majority of the high courts have reduced the severity of penalty on those who fail to provide information on time, or give the wrong information. The RTI law provides for a maximum penalty of R25,000 whereas several high courts, such that of Calcutta and Gujarat, impose a maximum penalty of R1,000. Many high courts insist on knowing the motive behind seeking information, which is prohibited under the RTI Act. The Jharkhand HC RTI rules ask the applicants to give the motive for seeking information in writing. "An impression is created that the (high court) authorities have not applied their mind while draftingrules..." said the study. High courts in several states stated that their respective chief justices can take a call on the information that has to be made public. The RTI law says that the official concerned can be penalised for delay or providing wrong information. In the case of UP and MP, the rules of the RTI Act have been made subservient to that of the courts. This makes procuring information difficult for RTI applicants. Also, the high courts of Allahabad, Kerala and Madras say that information can be made available only after getting the Chief Justice's approval.
|