Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28884, 'title' => 'Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 10 August, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states/article1-1378654.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676937, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28884, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Welfare', 'metaDesc' => ' -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. &nbsp; The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28884, 'title' => 'Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 10 August, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states/article1-1378654.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676937, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28884 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Welfare' $metaDesc = ' -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. &nbsp; The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government’s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the “eligible” claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as “village forest”, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28884, 'title' => 'Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 10 August, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states/article1-1378654.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676937, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28884, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Welfare', 'metaDesc' => ' -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. &nbsp; The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28884, 'title' => 'Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 10 August, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states/article1-1378654.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676937, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28884 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Welfare' $metaDesc = ' -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. &nbsp; The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government’s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the “eligible” claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as “village forest”, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7ed2cc23ca-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28884, 'title' => 'Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 10 August, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states/article1-1378654.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676937, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28884, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Welfare', 'metaDesc' => ' -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. &nbsp; The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28884, 'title' => 'Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 10 August, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states/article1-1378654.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676937, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28884 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Welfare' $metaDesc = ' -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. &nbsp; The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government&rsquo;s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the &ldquo;eligible&rdquo; claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as &ldquo;village forest&rdquo;, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government’s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the “eligible” claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as “village forest”, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28884, 'title' => 'Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government’s push for industries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the “eligible” claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as “village forest”, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 10 August, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states/article1-1378654.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676937, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28884, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Welfare', 'metaDesc' => ' -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government’s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the “eligible” claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as “village forest”, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28884, 'title' => 'Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government’s push for industries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the “eligible” claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as “village forest”, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 10 August, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states/article1-1378654.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'rules-to-bypass-forest-law-for-tribals-in-bjp-ruled-states-kumar-sambhav-shrivastava-4676937', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676937, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28884 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights,forest rights,forest rights act,Tribal Welfare' $metaDesc = ' -Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Hindustan Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government’s push for industries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the “eligible” claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as “village forest”, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Rules to bypass forest law for tribals in BJP-ruled states? -Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava |
-Hindustan Times Several BJP-ruled states have brought rules and orders that could scuttle implementation of the forest rights act (FRA), reveal documents available with Hindustan Times. The 2006 law upholds consent of villagers to divert forestland for industrial projects, considered a stumbling block to the Union government’s push for industries. The three forest-rich states of Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Maharashtra, which are home to a sizeable tribal population, have come up with rules and orders that, if implemented, may prevent recognition of tribal rights over forestland under the FRA. Tribal rights activists said the move to circumvent the law, which was to be implemented in toto to safeguard forest rights of local inhabitants, came from the states after the Union environment ministry unsuccessfully tried several times to dilute the FRA. In Chhattisgarh, as reported by HT on Monday, the BJP government has asked gram sabhas or village committees to certify that the law was implemented in full despite large-scale gaps. Such certificates are mandatory for diversion of forestland for industrial purpose. Toeing the Chhattisgarh line, Jharkhand instructed its deputy commissioners on July 28 to settle all the “eligible” claims of FRA within a month and get implementation certificates from gram sabhas by October 2. In eight years since the law was enforced, only 494 community forest rights titles have been issued in the mineral-rich and Maoist-hit state. This breached FRA rules that guaranteed community forest rights title to every village with forest dwellers. Experts said the one-month deadline for settling all eligible claims would leave several tribals without their legitimate rights. In Madhya Pradesh, a set of village forest rules was issued on July 4 through which the government has sought to declare wooded areas traditionally used by forest dwellers as “village forest”, instead of giving communities titles over such land under the FRA. The FRA bestows absolute authority to gram sabhas over community forests, but the new Madhya Pradesh rules give the forest department control over such land. Maharashtra, which issued similar rules last year, has asked villages with community forest rights titles to convert them into village forests. Several gram sabhas in the Maoist hub of Gadchiroli complained they were under pressure from the authorities to give up the right to their forestland. The Union tribal affairs ministry objected to the scheme but the Maharashtra government paid no heed and went ahead with its rules, spending crores to promote the plan. About 40 million hectares should be covered under FRA across the country, according to an analysis of data by US-based non-profit, Rights and Resources Initiative. But titles for only 3.5 million hectares have been issued so far.
|