Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 10 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2440780.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9973,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 10 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2440780.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9973,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9864
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.<br /><br />This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre's application to recall the order in the &lsquo;black money' case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.<br /><br />The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.<br /><br />In its application, the Centre said:<br /><br />&ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.<br /><br />In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.<br /><br />The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 10 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2440780.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9973,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 10 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2440780.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9973,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9864
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.<br /><br />This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre's application to recall the order in the &lsquo;black money' case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.<br /><br />The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.<br /><br />In its application, the Centre said:<br /><br />&ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.<br /><br />In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.<br /><br />The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fd9c6213e48-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 10 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2440780.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9973,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9864,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 10 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2440780.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9973,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9864
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre&#039;s application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre&#039;s application to recall the order in the &amp;lsquo;black money&#039; case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its application, the Centre said:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.<br /><br />This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre's application to recall the order in the &lsquo;black money' case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.<br /><br />The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.<br /><br />In its application, the Centre said:<br /><br />&ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.<br /><br />In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.<br /><br />The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 9864,
		'title' => 'Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.<br />
<br />
This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre's application to recall the order in the &lsquo;black money' case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.<br />
<br />
The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.<br />
<br />
In its application, the Centre said:<br />
<br />
&ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.<br />
<br />
In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.<br />
<br />
The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2440780.ece',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 9973,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 9864,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Human Rights',
	'metaDesc' => '

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.<br /><br />This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre's application to recall the order in the &lsquo;black money' case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.<br /><br />The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.<br /><br />In its application, the Centre said:<br /><br />&ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.<br /><br />In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.<br /><br />The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 9864,
	'title' => 'Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.<br />
<br />
This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre's application to recall the order in the &lsquo;black money' case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.<br />
<br />
The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.<br />
<br />
In its application, the Centre said:<br />
<br />
&ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.<br />
<br />
In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.<br />
<br />
The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 10 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2440780.ece',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'salwa-judum-review-plea-hearing-on-september-22-by-j-venkatesan-9973',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 9973,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 9864
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Human Rights'
$metaDesc = '

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution.<br /><br />This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre's application to recall the order in the &lsquo;black money' case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also.<br /><br />The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22.<br /><br />In its application, the Centre said:<br /><br />&ldquo;In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites.<br /><br />In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it.<br /><br />The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Salwa Judum: review plea hearing on September 22 by J Venkatesan

The Supreme Court on Friday posted for hearing on September 22 the Centre's application seeking recall/review of its order declaring illegal and unconstitutional the appointment of tribal youth as Special Police Officers/Salwa Judum by the Chhattisgarh government to counter Maoist violence. A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy (since retired) and S.S. Nijjar had passed the order on the writ petition filed by social anthropologist Nandini Sundar and others. The Centre sought recall of the order insofar as it pertained to references against the Union government in paragraphs 75 (ii) and 76, on the ground that they were against the spirit of the Constitution. This application was listed for hearing on Friday before a Bench of Justices Altamas Kabir, S.S. Nijjar and Gyan Sudha Misra. But Solicitor-General Rohinton Nariman suggested that since the order on the Centre's application to recall the order in the ‘black money' case was to be pronounced on September 20, the present application could be heard thereafter. For, that order relating to maintainability would have a bearing in this case also. The Bench accepted the request and posted the matter to September 22. In its application, the Centre said: “In Para 75 (ii) the court directed the Centre to cease and desist forthwith from using its funds for supporting, directly or indirectly, the recruitment of SPOs for being engaged in any form of counter-insurgency activities against Maoists/Naxalites. In Para 76, the court held that the appointment of SPOs to perform any of the duties of regular police officers, other than those specified in Sections 23(1)(h) and 23(1)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007, was unconstitutional.” The Centre said that under the Constitution, policing was exclusively in the domain of the executive and the judiciary could not interfere in it. The Union government said the court order directing disbanding and disarming of tribals, deployed as SPOs, would affect not only anti-Naxal operations but also its fight against militants in Jammu and Kashmir as well as in other States and in particular, the northeast.