Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell/874108/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11145,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Minority&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell/874108/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11145,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11031
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Minority&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.<br /><br />Principal judge S C Srivasatava&rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &mdash; were not &ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&rdquo;.<br /><br />Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.<br /><br />The court observed that Bhatt&rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.<br /><br />As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&rdquo;<br /><br />Also coming in 2008 was a witness&rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.<br /><br />The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.<br /><br />Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.<br /><br />Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&rdquo; the court said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell/874108/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11145,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Minority&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell/874108/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11145,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11031
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Minority&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.<br /><br />Principal judge S C Srivasatava&rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &mdash; were not &ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&rdquo;.<br /><br />Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.<br /><br />The court observed that Bhatt&rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.<br /><br />As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&rdquo;<br /><br />Also coming in 2008 was a witness&rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.<br /><br />The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.<br /><br />Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.<br /><br />Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&rdquo; the court said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f3977b89d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell/874108/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11145,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Minority&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11031,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell/874108/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11145,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11031
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Minority&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&amp;rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Principal judge S C Srivasatava&amp;rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &amp;mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &amp;mdash; were not &amp;ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&amp;rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court observed that Bhatt&amp;rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &amp;mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &amp;mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &amp;ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&amp;rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &amp;ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also coming in 2008 was a witness&amp;rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&amp;rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &amp;ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&amp;rdquo; the court said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.<br /><br />Principal judge S C Srivasatava&rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &mdash; were not &ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&rdquo;.<br /><br />Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.<br /><br />The court observed that Bhatt&rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.<br /><br />As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&rdquo;<br /><br />Also coming in 2008 was a witness&rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.<br /><br />The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.<br /><br />Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.<br /><br />Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&rdquo; the court said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 11031,
		'title' => 'Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.<br />
<br />
Principal judge S C Srivasatava&rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &mdash; were not &ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.<br />
<br />
The court observed that Bhatt&rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.<br />
<br />
As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Also coming in 2008 was a witness&rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.<br />
<br />
The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.<br />
<br />
Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.<br />
<br />
Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&rdquo; the court said.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell/874108/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 11145,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 11031,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Minority',
	'metaDesc' => '

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.<br /><br />Principal judge S C Srivasatava&rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &mdash; were not &ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&rdquo;.<br /><br />Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.<br /><br />The court observed that Bhatt&rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.<br /><br />As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&rdquo;<br /><br />Also coming in 2008 was a witness&rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.<br /><br />The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.<br /><br />Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.<br /><br />Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&rdquo; the court said.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 11031,
	'title' => 'Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.<br />
<br />
Principal judge S C Srivasatava&rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &mdash; were not &ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.<br />
<br />
The court observed that Bhatt&rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.<br />
<br />
As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Also coming in 2008 was a witness&rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.<br />
<br />
The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.<br />
<br />
Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.<br />
<br />
Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&rdquo; the court said.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 11 November, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell/874108/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'sardarpura-verdict-why-the-conspiracy-theory-fell-by-parimal-dabhi-11145',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 11145,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 11031
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Minority'
$metaDesc = '

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution&rsquo;s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting.<br /><br />Principal judge S C Srivasatava&rsquo;s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 &mdash; some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 &mdash; were not &ldquo;sufficient evidence for conspiracy&rdquo;.<br /><br />Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura&rsquo;s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them.<br /><br />The court observed that Bhatt&rsquo;s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then.<br /><br />As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp &mdash; power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills &mdash; in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, &ldquo;...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses&rdquo;. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, &ldquo;After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.&rdquo;<br /><br />Also coming in 2008 was a witness&rsquo;s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre.<br /><br />The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart&rsquo;s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman.<br /><br />Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008.<br /><br />Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. &ldquo;The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,&rdquo; the court said.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Sardarpura verdict: Why the conspiracy theory fell by Parimal Dabhi

The special court that sentenced 31 people for burning 33 Muslims to death in Sardarpura, Gujarat, did not find enough evidence to support the prosecution’s conspiracy theory. This was one of the reasons the defence argued successfully for life sentences for its clients, held guilty of murder and rioting. Principal judge S C Srivasatava’s 1,024-page judgment explained why seven incidents from 2002 — some of which the prosecution cited in 2008 — were not “sufficient evidence for conspiracy”. Two of these incidents involved a meeting each by former BJP MLA and VHP leader Haresh Bhatt from Godhra, and former Unjha MLA Naran Lallu Patel. Bhatt met Patel youths at Sardarpura 20 to 25 days before the attack and allegedly made an inflammatory speech. Then three days before the incident, N L Patel met Sardarpura’s Patels at a temple and allegedly told them to do whatever they wanted to; the government would be with them. The court observed that Bhatt’s alleged meeting could not be connected with the massacre, that this evidence from a witness came out only in May 2008, and that the probe had found nothing about this till then. As per some witnesses, the attackers lit a halogen lamp — power supply to the village had been snapped over pending bills — in front of the massacre site to facilitate the killing. The court ruled, “...There is much difference between the evidence of witnesses”. This evidence too came in May 2008 and the court observed, “After filing of the first chargesheet, history of halogen light and other incident is coming.” Also coming in 2008 was a witness’s statement to the SIT that some of the accused had stored and distributed kerosene before the massacre. The fifth incident involved a woman, Baisrabibi, who had gone to buy flour and alleged that a shopkeeper, an accused, had advised her to eat to her heart’s content while she could. The court found contradictions in the name of the shopkeeper as given by the woman. Another witness, working at the village water works, said two of the accused had taken the keys from him on the pretext of giving them to the sarpanch. The prosecution projected this as part of a conspiracy to deny the victims access to water to extinguish the fire. The court again questioned why the evidence came only in May 2008. Finally, the Mehsana DSP had deposed that some live wires were hanging around the site and the prosecution argued that this was to ensure the victims got electrocuted. But the court relied on the deposition of SP Anupam Gehlot, who said the live wires could have been hanging out because the wiring had been damaged during the massacre. “The DSP has falsified this account. Panchnama of scene of offence and witnesses also do not support this theory,” the court said.