Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68050663db191-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68050663db191-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68050663db191-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 23 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Delhi-HC-to-stay-CIC-order/articleshow/8519913.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7864,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 23 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Delhi-HC-to-stay-CIC-order/articleshow/8519913.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7864,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7765
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. <br /><br />How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &mdash; by June 5. <br /><br />Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&quot;. <br /><br />The SC's petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. <br /><br />The CIC's May 11 order went against the commission's consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. <br /><br />&quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&quot; it said. <br /><br />&quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&quot; the apex court said. <br /><br />The fallout of the CIC's order would be enormous, the SC said. &quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&quot; the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&quot; it said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68050663db191-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68050663db191-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68050663db191-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 23 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Delhi-HC-to-stay-CIC-order/articleshow/8519913.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7864,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 23 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Delhi-HC-to-stay-CIC-order/articleshow/8519913.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7864,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7765
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. <br /><br />How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &mdash; by June 5. <br /><br />Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&quot;. <br /><br />The SC's petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. <br /><br />The CIC's May 11 order went against the commission's consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. <br /><br />&quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&quot; it said. <br /><br />&quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&quot; the apex court said. <br /><br />The fallout of the CIC's order would be enormous, the SC said. &quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&quot; the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&quot; it said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68050663db191-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68050663db191-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68050663db191-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68050663db191-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 23 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Delhi-HC-to-stay-CIC-order/articleshow/8519913.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7864,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7765,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 23 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Delhi-HC-to-stay-CIC-order/articleshow/8519913.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7864,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7765
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission&#039;s May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &amp;mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &amp;mdash; by June 5. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &amp;quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SC&#039;s petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s May 11 order went against the commission&#039;s consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&amp;quot; it said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&amp;quot; the apex court said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fallout of the CIC&#039;s order would be enormous, the SC said. &amp;quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&amp;quot; the SC asked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The CIC&#039;s order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &amp;quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&amp;quot; it said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. <br /><br />How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &mdash; by June 5. <br /><br />Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&quot;. <br /><br />The SC's petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. <br /><br />The CIC's May 11 order went against the commission's consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. <br /><br />&quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&quot; it said. <br /><br />&quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&quot; the apex court said. <br /><br />The fallout of the CIC's order would be enormous, the SC said. &quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&quot; the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&quot; it said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 7765,
		'title' => 'SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. <br />
<br />
How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. <br />
<br />
The CIC's bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &mdash; by June 5. <br />
<br />
Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&quot;. <br />
<br />
The SC's petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. <br />
<br />
The CIC's May 11 order went against the commission's consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. <br />
<br />
&quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&quot; it said. <br />
<br />
&quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&quot; the apex court said. <br />
<br />
The fallout of the CIC's order would be enormous, the SC said. &quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&quot; the SC asked. <br />
<br />
The CIC's order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&quot; it said.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Delhi-HC-to-stay-CIC-order/articleshow/8519913.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 7864,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 7765,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information',
	'metaDesc' => '
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. <br /><br />How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &mdash; by June 5. <br /><br />Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&quot;. <br /><br />The SC's petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. <br /><br />The CIC's May 11 order went against the commission's consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. <br /><br />&quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&quot; it said. <br /><br />&quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&quot; the apex court said. <br /><br />The fallout of the CIC's order would be enormous, the SC said. &quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&quot; the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&quot; it said.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 7765,
	'title' => 'SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. <br />
<br />
How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. <br />
<br />
The CIC's bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &mdash; by June 5. <br />
<br />
Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&quot;. <br />
<br />
The SC's petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. <br />
<br />
The CIC's May 11 order went against the commission's consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. <br />
<br />
&quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&quot; it said. <br />
<br />
&quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&quot; the apex court said. <br />
<br />
The fallout of the CIC's order would be enormous, the SC said. &quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&quot; the SC asked. <br />
<br />
The CIC's order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&quot; it said.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 May, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/SC-asks-Delhi-HC-to-stay-CIC-order/articleshow/8519913.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'sc-asks-delhi-hc-to-stay-cic-order-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-7864',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 7864,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 7765
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information'
$metaDesc = '
The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. 

How could the Supreme Court provide information under...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. <br /><br />How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries &mdash; why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice &mdash; by June 5. <br /><br />Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that &quot;this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI&quot;. <br /><br />The SC's petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. <br /><br />The CIC's May 11 order went against the commission's consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. <br /><br />&quot;The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules,&quot; it said. <br /><br />&quot;The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge,&quot; the apex court said. <br /><br />The fallout of the CIC's order would be enormous, the SC said. &quot;Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues,&quot; the SC asked. <br /><br />The CIC's order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. &quot;If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records,&quot; it said.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

SC asks Delhi HC to stay CIC order by Dhananjay Mahapatra

The Supreme Court has rushed to the Delhi High Court seeking a stay on the Central Information Commission's May 11 order allowing litigants to raise RTI queries on the logic behind judgments. How could the Supreme Court provide information under RTI on why a particular order or judgment was passed that went beyond the reasoning and logic given in that order or judgment, the SC asked. The CIC's bare-all order on an RTI appeal filed by R S Misra directed the SC to answer his queries — why his special leave petition was dismissed and whether in deciding the appeal, the bench followed the principles of natural justice — by June 5. Terming the CIC order as beyond law and jurisdiction under RTI Act, the SC in its appeal through advocate Devadatt Kamat pleaded before the HC that "this would mean a litigant could redress his grievance against dismissal of SLP through RTI". The SC's petition, settled by attorney general G E Vahanvati, is listed for hearing in the Delhi HC on Monday before Justice S Muralidhar. The CIC's May 11 order went against the commission's consistent view since 2007 that access to information on the judicial side could be obtained only through the mechanism of Supreme Court Rules, the SC said. "The Supreme Court Rules have been framed under a mandate in Article 124-127 of the Constitution and as such, RTI Act cannot in any manner overrule the Supreme Court Rules," it said. "The CIC failed to appreciate that an RTI applicant cannot seek reason on why a particular order is passed and the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the SC cannot give information about reason for dismissal over and above what is already stated in the order of the judge," the apex court said. The fallout of the CIC's order would be enormous, the SC said. "Can RTI be made a tool to seek copy or information about confidential reports sought by Supreme Court benches from investigating agencies and governments on sensitive issues," the SC asked. The CIC's order could result in huge revenue loss for the apex court. "If people can get copies through RTI, it will also have revenue implications as court fees are fixed for getting certified copies of documents or records," it said.