Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120710/jsp/nation/story_15711254.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16152,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Communal Violence,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120710/jsp/nation/story_15711254.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16152,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16024
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Communal Violence,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC asks for shrine damage list</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &ldquo;inaction&rdquo; or &ldquo;negligence&rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&rdquo; Mehta declared.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &ldquo;We will examine the issue,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Legal experts also contested Gujarat&rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120710/jsp/nation/story_15711254.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16152,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Communal Violence,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120710/jsp/nation/story_15711254.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16152,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16024
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Communal Violence,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC asks for shrine damage list</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &ldquo;inaction&rdquo; or &ldquo;negligence&rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&rdquo; Mehta declared.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &ldquo;We will examine the issue,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Legal experts also contested Gujarat&rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680de446e4fa3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120710/jsp/nation/story_15711254.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16152,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Communal Violence,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16024,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 10 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120710/jsp/nation/story_15711254.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16152,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16024
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Communal Violence,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&amp;rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &amp;ldquo;inaction&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;negligence&amp;rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&amp;rdquo; Mehta declared.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &amp;ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&amp;rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &amp;ldquo;We will examine the issue,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Legal experts also contested Gujarat&amp;rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>SC asks for shrine damage list</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &ldquo;inaction&rdquo; or &ldquo;negligence&rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&rdquo; Mehta declared.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &ldquo;We will examine the issue,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Legal experts also contested Gujarat&rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 16024,
		'title' => 'SC asks for shrine damage list',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &ldquo;inaction&rdquo; or &ldquo;negligence&rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&rdquo; Mehta declared.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &ldquo;We will examine the issue,&rdquo; he said.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Legal experts also contested Gujarat&rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 10 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120710/jsp/nation/story_15711254.jsp',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 16152,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 16024,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Communal Violence,Law and Justice',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these...',
	'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &ldquo;inaction&rdquo; or &ldquo;negligence&rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&rdquo; Mehta declared.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &ldquo;We will examine the issue,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Legal experts also contested Gujarat&rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 16024,
	'title' => 'SC asks for shrine damage list',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &ldquo;inaction&rdquo; or &ldquo;negligence&rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&rdquo; Mehta declared.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &ldquo;We will examine the issue,&rdquo; he said.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Legal experts also contested Gujarat&rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 10 July, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120710/jsp/nation/story_15711254.jsp',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'sc-asks-for-shrine-damage-list-16152',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 16152,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 16024
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC asks for shrine damage list'
$metaKeywords = 'Communal Violence,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph





The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these...'
$disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer&rsquo;s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its &ldquo;inaction&rdquo; or &ldquo;negligence&rdquo; and had asked it to compensate for it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Not even in the case of a tsunami,&rdquo; Mehta declared.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that &ldquo;prima facie the state was on slippery ground&rdquo;, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. &ldquo;We will examine the issue,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Legal experts also contested Gujarat&rsquo;s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

SC asks for shrine damage list

-The Telegraph The Supreme Court today asked Gujarat to submit a list, if any, of religious structures damaged in the 2002 riots as the state dug in its heels and declared its intention not to pay for the repair of these structures. A two-judge bench, comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Mishra, adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 30 but not before it declared its intention to examine whether a state could be asked to compensate for such damage. The court said it would examine the contours of both Article 27, which bars the state from using the exchequer’s money to promote any particular religion, and also whether the high court could have issued such a direction under Article 226. Gujarat High Court had on February 8 this year rapped the Modi government by saying that the damage had occurred because of its “inaction” or “negligence” and had asked it to compensate for it. The order came on a PIL filed by the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat. The committee claimed that over 500 such structures were damaged in the post-Godhra riots. The high court had asked the state to either pay for the repair of these structures or, in case they had already been repaired, to compensate those who spent the funds. The state then appealed against this order to the top court. Today the state, through additional advocate general Tushar Mehta, argued that the state could not be asked to make such payments when it did not have a policy allowing it. The state has a policy of not making such payments, he claimed. The state had not made such payments even in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, he insisted, prompting the court to wonder if it would not make such payments in case of a tsunami or any other natural calamity. “Not even in the case of a tsunami,” Mehta declared. Justice Radhakrishnan observed at this point that “prima facie the state was on slippery ground”, but directed it to submit a list of such damaged properties, if any. “We will examine the issue,” he said. The state had been asked to submit the list at the last hearing, but expressed its inability today to do so in such a short time. The bench then granted it time till July 30 to submit a list. Mehta also claimed that some Sikhs had moved the court seeking compensation for gurdwaras damaged in the 1984 riots since the high court passed the order. Arguing for the committee, counsel Y.H. Muchhale contested this, saying the state gave grants to the Somnath and Ambaji temples every year. Legal experts also contested Gujarat’s stand. They cited examples of the 2008 Kandhamal riots in which the Odisha government was directed by the apex court to pay damages to churches and complied without a demur. They said the Constitution did not forbid help to any religious institution. It only forbids the state from compelling any person to pay any tax that would be spent for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion. It also forbids the state from providing any religious instruction in any institution maintained out of state funds. By corollary, they said, the Indian state could extend affirmative help to all religious denominations across the board. They cited examples of the Haj subsidy and the grants made to temples all over the country to bolster their arguments.