Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 18122,
'title' => 'SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br />
<br />
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br />
<br />
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br />
<br />
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 23 November, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1121123/jsp/nation/story_16231097.jsp#.UK8T3GfNNP0',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 18251,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 18122,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'metaKeywords' => 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br /><br />&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 18122,
'title' => 'SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br />
<br />
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br />
<br />
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br />
<br />
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 23 November, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1121123/jsp/nation/story_16231097.jsp#.UK8T3GfNNP0',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 18251,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 18122
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts'
$metaKeywords = 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br /><br />&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>SC dares govt to bar judges from posts</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested “there should be no post-retirement employment”.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />“You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,” the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre’s review petition.<br /><br />“You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government…. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,” the bench said.<br /><br />“The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,” the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government’s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges’ chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 18122,
'title' => 'SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br />
<br />
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br />
<br />
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br />
<br />
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 23 November, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1121123/jsp/nation/story_16231097.jsp#.UK8T3GfNNP0',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 18251,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 18122,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'metaKeywords' => 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br /><br />&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 18122,
'title' => 'SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br />
<br />
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br />
<br />
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br />
<br />
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 23 November, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1121123/jsp/nation/story_16231097.jsp#.UK8T3GfNNP0',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 18251,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 18122
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts'
$metaKeywords = 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br /><br />&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>SC dares govt to bar judges from posts</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested “there should be no post-retirement employment”.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />“You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,” the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre’s review petition.<br /><br />“You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government…. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,” the bench said.<br /><br />“The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,” the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government’s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges’ chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804571441bc0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804571441bc0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 18122,
'title' => 'SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br />
<br />
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br />
<br />
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br />
<br />
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 23 November, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1121123/jsp/nation/story_16231097.jsp#.UK8T3GfNNP0',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 18251,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 18122,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'metaKeywords' => 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br /><br />&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 18122,
'title' => 'SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br />
<br />
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br />
<br />
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br />
<br />
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 23 November, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1121123/jsp/nation/story_16231097.jsp#.UK8T3GfNNP0',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 18251,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 18122
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts'
$metaKeywords = 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested &ldquo;there should be no post-retirement employment&rdquo;.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />&ldquo;You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre&rsquo;s review petition.<br /><br />&ldquo;You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government&hellip;. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,&rdquo; the bench said.<br /><br />&ldquo;The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,&rdquo; the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government&rsquo;s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges&rsquo; chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>SC dares govt to bar judges from posts</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested “there should be no post-retirement employment”.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />“You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,” the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre’s review petition.<br /><br />“You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government…. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,” the bench said.<br /><br />“The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,” the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government’s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges’ chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 18122,
'title' => 'SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested “there should be no post-retirement employment”.<br />
<br />
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br />
<br />
“You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,” the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre’s review petition.<br />
<br />
“You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government…. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,” the bench said.<br />
<br />
“The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,” the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br />
<br />
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government’s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges’ chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br />
<br />
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br />
<br />
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 23 November, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1121123/jsp/nation/story_16231097.jsp#.UK8T3GfNNP0',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 18251,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 18122,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'metaKeywords' => 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested “there should be no post-retirement employment”.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />“You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,” the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre’s review petition.<br /><br />“You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government…. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,” the bench said.<br /><br />“The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,” the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government’s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges’ chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 18122,
'title' => 'SC dares govt to bar judges from posts',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br />
<br />
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested “there should be no post-retirement employment”.<br />
<br />
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br />
<br />
“You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,” the bench said.<br />
<br />
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre’s review petition.<br />
<br />
“You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government…. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,” the bench said.<br />
<br />
“The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,” the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br />
<br />
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government’s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges’ chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br />
<br />
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br />
<br />
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 23 November, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1121123/jsp/nation/story_16231097.jsp#.UK8T3GfNNP0',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 18251,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 18122
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts'
$metaKeywords = 'Judicial Accountability,Law and Justice,Governance,Corruption'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.<br /><br />A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested “there should be no post-retirement employment”.<br /><br />The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.<br /><br />“You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,” the bench said.<br /><br />The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre’s review petition.<br /><br />“You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government…. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,” the bench said.<br /><br />“The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,” the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.<br /><br />On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government’s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges’ chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.<br /><br />Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.<br /><br />The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/sc-dares-govt-to-bar-judges-from-posts-18251.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | SC dares govt to bar judges from posts | Im4change.org
SC dares govt to bar judges from posts
-The Telegraph
The Supreme Court today dared the Centre to enact a law to prohibit retired judges or bureaucrats from taking up post-retirement positions in commissions or other government undertakings.
A bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar threw down the gauntlet when additional solicitor-general A.S. Chandiok suggested “there should be no post-retirement employment”.
The law officer also asked the court to review its September 12 judgment that only sitting or retired chief justices of high courts or retired Supreme Court judges could head the central and state information commissions.
“You make the law and then say that people who have retired as government officials or judges should not be re-appointed,” the bench said.
The apex court, though, issued a notice to the respondent, Nandita Sharma, on the Centre’s review petition.
“You find that chief commissioners are persons who have been in the good books of the government…. They must act independently. If the Right to Information Act is to be really given effect to, it must be headed by a person who is an independent authority,” the bench said.
“The idea is not to rehabilitate high court or Supreme Court judges. It is only to ensure independence of the post. It (RTI) is a social act. The person must have legal knowledge. He need not be a judge. We have said he can even be an advocate. The top man must be independent,” the bench said, posting the matter to November 29 for further hearing.
On November 20, the bench had agreed to take up the government’s review petition in an open court, marking a departure from the convention of deciding such petitions only inside judges’ chambers where no counsel are permitted to be present.
Since the hearing is being held in an open court, advocates can advance fresh arguments on the controversial judgement.
The judgment had drawn flak on the ground that the court went beyond its jurisdiction.
